- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 710
From Spiegel Onine:
Interview with German Defense Minister
Army's Composition 'Still Reflects Spirit of Cold War (usual copyright disclaimer)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,700511,00.html
Mark
Ottawa
Interview with German Defense Minister
Army's Composition 'Still Reflects Spirit of Cold War (usual copyright disclaimer)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,700511,00.html
In a SPIEGEL interview, German Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, 38, discusses his controversial proposal to end mandatory conscription, the future of Germany's army and the government's ongoing headaches with the arms industry.
SPIEGEL: Minister Guttenberg, how will the German Armed Forces, the Bundeswehr, look in 10 years?
Guttenberg: Different.
SPIEGEL: Could you perhaps elaborate a bit?
Guttenberg: In 10 years we will have caught up on the backlog of necessary reforms. The army will be smaller and trained for the challenges of asymmetrical threats. It cannot be, with 252,000 soldiers, that we have already reached the limits of our abilities when only 8,000 soldiers are deployed at the same time. In 10 years we will be more professional, faster and more flexible. We will have the potential to deploy our soldiers around the world and still not neglect our own defense.
SPIEGEL: In 10 years, what portion of the military's activities will consist of national defense?
Guttenberg: Less. The necessity of defending our borders has already shrunk to a minimum. The Bundeswehr's structures, though, still reflect to an extent the spirit of the Cold War. There have been attempts to change this, calling the process "transformation," but so far this has brought too little progress. I've created a structural commission for this reason. That seems to me the more fitting word -- we need to change structures as well.
SPIEGEL: Why would you be able to achieve what none of your predecessors has managed in the past two decades?
Guttenberg: Because up to now, far too many people were able to use this argument: Let's see if we can free up some funds here or there, without taking any drastic measures or alarming anyone. Those days, unfortunately, are over. Now not only do we want to reform, we must reform. Simply put, there isn't enough money [emphasis added, about money
http://forums.milnet.ca/forums/threads/81956/post-945325.html#msg945325 ]...
SPIEGEL: One possibility for cutting costs would be a rational division of labor in NATO and the European Union. Doesn't it seem crazy that in a united Europe, each country still maintains an entire army?
Guttenberg: You are correct, such a division of labor is urgently needed, but in some places, it exists already. There is a German-Dutch corps and a German-French brigade, as well as joint defense projects. But we certainly have not yet found the splendidly successful model that I would like to see. In order to do so, we all need to overcome our national selfishness.
SPIEGEL: If there's one area that exhibits no concept of Europe as a whole, it's defense policy. Could you imagine one day having Dutch pilots monitor German airspace?
Guttenberg: It will be a laborious process, but I don't see the notion as absurd. There is no reason for each individual country in the EU to keep hold of every single task.
SPIEGEL: And presumably still more money will simply be thrown away on failed defense projects
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,640426,00.html
-- on helicopters that can't be used and cargo planes that don't fly [emphasis added, MHP?].
Guttenberg: This is one of the four major aspects the structural commission is currently addressing. It is intolerable that defense projects are generally completed extraordinarily late and are exorbitantly expensive. And it is simply absurd to have a project that includes the number "90" in its name -- because it dates from 1990 -- and is still not fully operational.
SPIEGEL: What has gone so seriously wrong? Other countries seem to manage to get airborne.
Guttenberg: This is not a national phenomenon, but an international one. Still, the ministry does in fact lack appropriate project management and specialist personnel for the approval process. That is an area where we need to optimize further. On the other hand, we also cannot just allow the defense industry to get away with anything it can.
SPIEGEL: Why not put aside industrial policy considerations and make more off-the-shelf purchases?
Guttenberg: One thing is clear: Industry and regional structural policies alone can no longer be the only justifications for Bundeswehr decisions [emphasis added, indeed--fixed-wing SAR, F-35 for new fighter, JSS, A/OPS]?...
Mark
Ottawa