• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Bundeswehr reform?

MarkOttawa

Army.ca Fixture
Inactive
Fallen Comrade
Reaction score
147
Points
710
From Spiegel Onine:

Interview with German Defense Minister
Army's Composition 'Still Reflects Spirit of Cold War
(usual copyright disclaimer)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,700511,00.html

In a SPIEGEL interview, German Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, 38, discusses his controversial proposal to end mandatory conscription, the future of Germany's army and the government's ongoing headaches with the arms industry.

SPIEGEL: Minister Guttenberg, how will the German Armed Forces, the Bundeswehr, look in 10 years?

Guttenberg: Different.

SPIEGEL: Could you perhaps elaborate a bit?

Guttenberg: In 10 years we will have caught up on the backlog of necessary reforms. The army will be smaller and trained for the challenges of asymmetrical threats. It cannot be, with 252,000 soldiers, that we have already reached the limits of our abilities when only 8,000 soldiers are deployed at the same time. In 10 years we will be more professional, faster and more flexible. We will have the potential to deploy our soldiers around the world and still not neglect our own defense.

SPIEGEL: In 10 years, what portion of the military's activities will consist of national defense?

Guttenberg: Less. The necessity of defending our borders has already shrunk to a minimum. The Bundeswehr's structures, though, still reflect to an extent the spirit of the Cold War. There have been attempts to change this, calling the process "transformation," but so far this has brought too little progress. I've created a structural commission for this reason. That seems to me the more fitting word -- we need to change structures as well.

SPIEGEL: Why would you be able to achieve what none of your predecessors has managed in the past two decades?

Guttenberg: Because up to now, far too many people were able to use this argument: Let's see if we can free up some funds here or there, without taking any drastic measures or alarming anyone. Those days, unfortunately, are over. Now not only do we want to reform, we must reform. Simply put, there isn't enough money [emphasis added, about money
http://forums.milnet.ca/forums/threads/81956/post-945325.html#msg945325 ]...

SPIEGEL: One possibility for cutting costs would be a rational division of labor in NATO and the European Union. Doesn't it seem crazy that in a united Europe, each country still maintains an entire army?

Guttenberg: You are correct, such a division of labor is urgently needed, but in some places, it exists already. There is a German-Dutch corps and a German-French brigade, as well as joint defense projects. But we certainly have not yet found the splendidly successful model that I would like to see. In order to do so, we all need to overcome our national selfishness.

SPIEGEL: If there's one area that exhibits no concept of Europe as a whole, it's defense policy. Could you imagine one day having Dutch pilots monitor German airspace?

Guttenberg: It will be a laborious process, but I don't see the notion as absurd. There is no reason for each individual country in the EU to keep hold of every single task.

SPIEGEL: And presumably still more money will simply be thrown away on failed defense projects
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,640426,00.html
-- on helicopters that can't be used and cargo planes that don't fly [emphasis added, MHP?].

Guttenberg: This is one of the four major aspects the structural commission is currently addressing. It is intolerable that defense projects are generally completed extraordinarily late and are exorbitantly expensive. And it is simply absurd to have a project that includes the number "90" in its name -- because it dates from 1990 -- and is still not fully operational.

SPIEGEL: What has gone so seriously wrong? Other countries seem to manage to get airborne.

Guttenberg: This is not a national phenomenon, but an international one. Still, the ministry does in fact lack appropriate project management and specialist personnel for the approval process. That is an area where we need to optimize further. On the other hand, we also cannot just allow the defense industry to get away with anything it can.

SPIEGEL: Why not put aside industrial policy considerations and make more off-the-shelf purchases?

Guttenberg: One thing is clear: Industry and regional structural policies alone can no longer be the only justifications for Bundeswehr decisions
[emphasis added, indeed--fixed-wing SAR, F-35 for new fighter, JSS, A/OPS]?...

Mark
Ottawa
 
Guttenberg ?
Oh !  you mean:
Karl Theodor Maria Nikolaus Johann Jacob Philipp Franz Joseph Sylvester Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg , known as Karl-Theodor Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg or simply Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg.

Ya
 
The following article, also from Der Speigel, expands a little on the controversy of Herr Guttenberg's suggestion that compulsory military service be eliminated in Germany.  It may also be agrument against the rare odd sort (who occasionally pops up on these means) proposing conscription as a means of connecting Canada's population to its military.

Killing Time - For Conscripts, German Military Service is Battle against Boredom
SPEIGEL ONLINE  06/24/2010 03:57 PM
By Michael Fröhlingsdorf, Sven Röbel and Christoph Scheuermann

Every year, tens of thousands of young German men are called up to do compulsory military service. But they are just a burden to the Bundeswehr, which has no need for half-trained conscripts. The recruits spend much of their service finding ways to defeat their biggest enemy: boredom.

David (not his real name) had been looking forward to serving in the German military, the Bundeswehr. He had even thought about signing up as a regular soldier after completing his compulsory military service.

It was on a day in March when David was forced to realize that the military did not, however, share his enthusiasm. He was standing with other recent conscripts in the barrack yard of a logistics battalion in Bavaria. The three dozen young men, most of them 18 years old, were a reasonably motivated group. But the trainers looked discouraged when they saw David and his fellow recruits standing in the yard. "There are so many of them again," one of the superior officers said under his breath. What on earth were they going to do with the young men?

The question of what should be done with them is currently the subject of heated debate in Berlin. If Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg has his way, the draft will soon be eliminated. Though a vocal supporter of compulsory military service until recently, Guttenberg, who belongs to the conservative Christian Social Union (CSU), the Bavarian sister party to Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union, has changed his position. Now Guttenberg, who holds the rank of corporal in the reserves, told SPIEGEL in an interview that "in practice (military service) will be gone in 10 years."

With this statement, Guttenberg antagonized members of his own party, especially Volker Kauder, the floor leader of the conservatives' parliamentary group. Kauder says that compulsory military service is a core concern of his party, the CDU, and that it is an "instrument for linking society with the Bundeswehr." CSU leader Horst Seehofer, who characterizes his party as "a party of the Bundeswehr," says: "We say yes to compulsory military service." Chancellor Angela Merkel, who considers compulsory military service a "success story," reined in the defense minister, because she believes that a large proportion of her voters support military service.


Outdated

These are the old, familiar rituals once again. Compulsory military service has always been one of the great taboos of German politics. Until the 1980s, hundreds of thousands of men were still needed in case a massive army had to be quickly mobilized to face off against the forces of the Warsaw Pact. But with the implosion of the Eastern Bloc and the end of the Cold War, conscription has become outdated.

For Germany, a country surrounded by friendly neighbors, national defense is hardly a concern anymore. Bundeswehr soldiers are now fighting in Afghanistan or overseeing a weapons embargo off the coast of Lebanon as part of the United Nations' UNIFIL force. The army's young conscripts are of no use to anyone. Poorly trained and neglected by the government, they spend much of their military service killing time.

But now there is some hope that things could change, because the government has to tighten its belt. Without the funds to support it, the draft will probably soon cease to exist. Officials at the Defense Ministry have calculated that the Bundeswehr would cost the government almost €500 million ($610 million) less per year if military service were abolished.

Currently, compulsory military service lasts nine months, which consists of three months of basic training and six months spent at a barracks somewhere in Germany. Six months at a barracks doesn't necessarily seem like a long time, but it can feel a lot longer for people who don't know what they are supposed to do with themselves. In fact, no one knows what they are supposed to do. David, the enthusiastic young conscript, didn't know, his fellow members of the logistics battalion don't know and hardly any of the roughly 60,000 German conscripts knows. Not even the Bundeswehr itself knows.

Dawdling Away the Days

This is why many conscripts, after completing basic training, learn how to spend time when there is nothing to do. They learn how to dawdle away hours, days, weeks and months, how to waste time running errands and sitting in office chairs, and they learn how to daydream in their units and offices, in hallways, rooms and barrack yards. Essentially, they learn how to loaf around. In the process, they become lazy, silly or creative, or sometimes all three. They do things like hold sleeping bag races, which they record with their mobile phone cameras. The Internet is full of such videos.

Seen in a positive light, compulsory military service is a gigantic, nine-month-long party for a bunch of young men (women are exempt from conscription in Germany). But what's the point of it all? What was the purpose of the government calling up 63,413 men for military service last year? Why does the state intervene in the lives of so many young people, even though it cannot explain to them what exactly they are supposed to do once they've arrived at their barracks?

Many conscripts believe that the government knows very well why it is drafting them and depriving them of their freedom for nine months. But the truth is more banal than that: It doesn't know. If it did, it would treat the young men differently. Five decades after it was introduced, the German draft has turned into a huge machine that is fed with young men and produces government-organized mass unemployment in the barracks.

The soldiers have come up with a word for the kind of activity that serves the sole purpose of making it seem as if they were busy. They call it Dummfick (loosely translatable as "stupid fucking around").

Cleaning Clean Guns

Shortly after reporting for duty to his logistics battalion, David was ordered to clean some guns. There was only one problem: The guns were already clean. In fact, they had never been used. Some would say it was meant to be practice, but David had already learned how to clean guns in basic training. Nevertheless, he sat down on a chair in front of the weapons room, a clean MG 3 machine gun in front of him, and took apart, polished and reassembled it. Taking things apart, cleaning them, and putting them back together, hour after hour, day after day -- that's how conscripts spend their time.

To make matters worse, says David, the barracks were completely full, with four bunk beds in each room. Some of his fellow soldiers had to store their equipment in the attic because there wasn't any space for additional cupboards in the room.

After graduating from high school, David, who comes from a small town in the western state of Hesse, was tempted by the prospect of getting a university education at the Bundeswehr and pursuing a career as an officer in the air force. His euphoria didn't last long. After two weeks, he was transferred from the weapons room to the company's business office, where there was just as little to do.

At least he didn't suffer the fate of a recruit in a transport battalion in western Germany, who was assigned to guard a telephone and answer official calls coming in to the phone. It was a monotonous task, because the phone never rang -- for weeks on end. It wasn't until a supervisor had the office furniture moved around that the soldier noticed the outlet behind a cupboard. As it turned out, the phone wasn't even plugged in.

'Hanging-Around Service'

But instead of using such accounts as an argument for abolishing military service, the Bundestag, Germany's parliament, last week only approved the shortening of the period of service from nine months to six months, effective July 1. The CDU/CSU and its junior coalition partner, the Free Democratic Party (FDP), agreed to the six-month period of mandatory service in their coalition negotiations. It was a compromise between the liberal FDP, which wanted to jettison compulsory military service altogether, and the conservatives, who baulked at the idea. The compromise only exacerbates the dilemma, however, because the recruits can be used even less effectively within the shorter time frame.

"The military and personal benefits of basic military service must be at least equal," says Hellmut Königshaus, the parliamentary commissioner for the Bundeswehr. Otherwise, he argues, conscription would come into conflict with Germany's constitution. Königshaus occasionally receives letters from soldiers who feel unchallenged and complain about pointless tasks. However, Königshaus points out, it "can be assumed that 'hanging-around service' among conscripts is more widespread that is reflected in the number of complaints."

Eleven years ago, then-Defense Minister Rudolf Scharping charged a commission with finding ways to make the Bundeswehr more modern, cost-effective and efficient. The commission, headed by former German President Richard von Weizsäcker, discussed the possibility of abolishing compulsory military service, but Scharping was opposed to the idea, and he still favors the draft today. In April, Defense Minister Guttenberg also established a reform commission. The results are expected in September.

Playing Poker

Until then, new recruits will continue arriving who are more interested in killing time than anything else. When David was transferred to the administrative office, three other soldiers were already there, busy managing the great void. Because there were now only three desk chairs for the four soldiers, one of them was always on break in his room or leaning up against the counter in the hallway. David says that the high point of the day was making the daily trip from his office to the barracks post office, which was 300 meters away. He also spent his time trying to beat the record high score in the card game Solitaire on the office computer, or playing online poker or dice with the others. On some days, he says, he already went to bed in the late afternoon.

Many potential soldiers stand a good chance of not being drafted in the first place. Of the 417,300 potential conscripts who underwent a medical examination last year, almost 43 percent were rejected as being "unfit for military service" -- an army of invalids comprising 178,325 men, or the equivalent of about a dozen divisions. It's a total that also happens to be politically convenient.

The number of men deemed unfit for military service has been growing for years (see graphic). "The numbers point to a significant decline in general physical fitness and capability," the former parliamentary commissioner for the armed forces, Reinhold Robbe, wrote in his 2007 annual report. He blamed the deficit on emotional stress, the rise in illegal and prescription drug use, as well as television and computers. Robbe painted a bleak picture, portraying almost half of those eligible for compulsory military service as a bunch of maladjusted youths who spent their time smoking pot in front of their PlayStations while stuffing slices of pizza into their mouths.

Raising Standards

But the Bundeswehr also has no interest in a large number of new conscripts. They cost money and take up both space and valuable personnel time. In light of the goal of turning the Bundeswehr into an army of soldiers trained for individual missions and intervention campaigns, soldiers that cannot be deployed abroad are merely a burden. To at least preserve the appearance of fairness in the selection process for military service, the suitability standards are being raised higher and higher, thereby reducing the number of eligible candidates.

In the 2009 selection process, for example, those who were unfit for duty were eliminated first, followed by conscientious objectors, prospective police officers and firefighters. As a result, only 96,185 draft notices were sent out, and tens of thousands of those were nullified for other reasons. Thanks to age limits being exceeded, the nullification of draft notices and deferments, or simply for "organizational reasons," only 68,304 men were ordered to report for duty. Of that number, 4,891 left their units in the first four weeks. In the end, there were 63,413 conscripts left who were expected to go through the motions of serving their country.

To implement political requirements, the medical examinations for military services are filled with absurdities designed to provide district recruiting offices with as much leeway as possible in the effort to sort out unsuitable candidates. According to one of the rules, recruits are medically unfit for duty if they are allergic to celery. In the Bundeswehr, celery is used in meat and vegetable stews, among other things.

Arbitrary Criteria

Those who are allergic to bee and wasp stings are also considered unfit for duty. Young men who are unable to tolerate prophylactic drugs against malaria and yellow fever are also sent home -- even though neither of the diseases has been reported in Germany in its recent history, and conscripts have never been sent to serve in jungles.

Oddly enough, young men who register as conscientious objectors, either before or during the medical examinations, stand less chance of being excused from duty. They have to perform an alternative "civilian service" known as Zivildienst, typically by carrying out social work in places such as hospitals or retirement homes. Unlike the Bundeswehr, the Federal Office for Civilian Service has many clients who like to employ cheap labor, such as private nursing services.

The procedures employed in district recruiting offices, on the other hand, are often arbitrary. The officials have been known to send home a recruit with tooth decay while pronouncing a recruit with a healed, comminuted fracture fit for duty.

With these practices, the Bundeswehr has also managed to alienate the enthusiastic conscripts. Sven, a 21-year-old from Hanover in northern Germany, was assigned to work as a medic after basic training. "I'm going to learn some medical things that I'll be able to use later on," he thought at first. Instead, Sven learned how to use a blood-pressure monitor. Once he had mastered this task, he was told to go from bed to bed, shortly after his comrades had been wakened in the morning, and ask them if their bowel movements were OK.

Bored to Tears

If one types the words "Bundeswehr" and "Langeweile" ("boredom") into the video platform YouTube, the scope of the great void becomes even clearer. The videos that appear depict German recruits doing battle with their biggest enemy: boredom.

In one video, a soldier wearing a camouflage uniform and a gas mask dances to techno music, using a broom as his dancing partner. In another film, soldiers play the game of "bed tipping," which involves tipping one of their comrades off his mattress. There is the Bundeswehr Twist, in which recruits in camouflage, steel helmets and gas masks dance the day away, and then there is the film in which men sitting in their room use tape to remove body hair from each other's thighs.

In another video, soldiers strap steel helmets to their elbows and knees and hop around on all fours across the linoleum floor, performing a "turtle race." In another, men stuff themselves into military-issue sleeping bags, like fat caterpillars, and then roll across the barracks floor -- to the applause of their comrades.

One three-minute video shows a soldier sitting on a chair. He is so tired that he can hardly keep his eyes open. He is a comic and sad-looking figure, but also a wonderful allegory for the complete absurdity of compulsory military service. Naturally, there are also plenty of videos that show soldiers drinking and vomiting.

After four weeks of doing nothing in the administrative office of his logistics battalion in Bavaria, David realized that he was wasting his time. He went to his supervisor's office, where he filed a retroactive petition as a conscientious objector. He now performs community service for a nursing agency.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan


RELATED SPIEGEL ONLINE LINKS:
Photo Gallery: The Biggest Enemy Is Boredom
http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-56342.html
Interview with German Defense Minister: Army's Composition 'Still Reflects Spirit of Cold War' (06/14/2010)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,700511,00.html
Radical Cutbacks: German Government Agrees on Historic Austerity Program (06/07/2010)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,699229,00.html
Preparing for More Ambushes: German Army Steps up Combat Training for Afghan Mission (05/24/2010)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,696447,00.html
The Twilight of the Civvies: Germany To Scale Back Mandatory Civilian Service (05/21/2010)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,692751,00.html
Deadly Attack in Afghanistan: German Soldiers Complain of Insufficient Training (04/07/2010)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,687758,00.html
 
Really big reform, er, cuts (usual copyright disclaimer):

In Retreat
German Military Reform Could Halve Ground Forces

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,710853,00.html#ref=nlint

...
Germany's ground forces would be almost halved under a reform plan favored by Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, SPIEGEL has learned.

An internal paper suggests cutting the army from 95,000 soldiers to 54,558. The number of battle tanks would also be reduced by almost half. The strength of the infantry would remain almost unchanged at around 10,000 troops [emphasis added, that's all?!?].

Critics say the reform plan won't improve the situation of German infantry soldiers on foreign missions, who are being worn down by the high frequency of missions and insufficient rest and recuperation time. Germany is currently the third-biggest international troop provider in Afghanistan with more than 4,000 soldiers stationed there.

The government decided in June to radically downsize the German army as part of its austerity program. The Defense Ministry is currently reviewing a number of different reform plans aimed at modernizing the army
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,708924,00.html
and improving its ability to conduct military missions abroad. The ministry is expected to submit its proposal in the autumn.

The reforms have led to a debate about whether Germany should end conscription.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,708905,00.html
The pro-business Free Democratic Party, the junior partner to Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives in the center-right coalition government, is calling for conscription to be abolished.

But the conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) and the Christian Social Union (CSU) fear a grassroots rebellion in their parties, where many see conscription as a valuable tool to anchor the army in society.

Mark
Ottawa
 
Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act.


German Military Reform Could Halve Ground Forces


08/09/2010
SPIEGEL ONLINE


LINK

German Defense Minister Guttenberg favors a plan to reform the army by halving the number of ground troops and battle tanks, SPIEGEL has learned. His ministry is due to present a reform plan in autumn in a bid to cut costs and boost the army's effectiveness.

Germany's ground forces would be almost halved under a reform plan favored by Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, SPIEGEL has learned.


An internal paper suggests cutting the army from 95,000 soldiers to 54,558. The number of battle tanks would also be reduced by almost half. The strength of the infantry would remain almost unchanged at around 10,000 troops.

Critics say the reform plan won't improve the situation of German infantry soldiers on foreign missions, who are being worn down by the high frequency of missions and insufficient rest and recuperation time. Germany is currently the third-biggest international troop provider in Afghanistan with more than 4,000 soldiers stationed there.

The government decided in June to radically downsize the German army as part of its austerity program. The Defense Ministry is currently reviewing a number of different reform plans aimed at modernizing the army and improving its ability to conduct military missions abroad. The ministry is expected to submit its proposal in the autumn.

The reforms have led to a debate about whether Germany should end conscription. The pro-business Free Democratic Party, the junior partner to Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives in the center-right coalition government, is calling for conscription to be abolished.

But the conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) and the Christian Social Union (CSU) fear a grassroots rebellion in their parties, where many see conscription as a valuable tool to anchor the army in society.

SPIEGEL Staff
 
Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act.
Killing Time

For Conscripts, German Military Service is Battle against Boredom

By Michael Fröhlingsdorf, Sven Röbel and Christoph Scheuermann
06/24/2010
SPIEGEL ONLINE


LINK

Every year, tens of thousands of young German men are called up to do compulsory military service. But they are just a burden to the Bundeswehr, which has no need for half-trained conscripts. The recruits spend much of their service finding ways to defeat their biggest enemy: boredom.

David (not his real name) had been looking forward to serving in the German military, the Bundeswehr. He had even thought about signing up as a regular soldier after completing his compulsory military service.


It was on a day in March when David was forced to realize that the military did not, however, share his enthusiasm. He was standing with other recent conscripts in the barrack yard of a logistics battalion in Bavaria. The three dozen young men, most of them 18 years old, were a reasonably motivated group. But the trainers looked discouraged when they saw David and his fellow recruits standing in the yard. "There are so many of them again," one of the superior officers said under his breath. What on earth were they going to do with the young men?

The question of what should be done with them is currently the subject of heated debate in Berlin. If Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg has his way, the draft will soon be eliminated. Though a vocal supporter of compulsory military service until recently, Guttenberg, who belongs to the conservative Christian Social Union (CSU), the Bavarian sister party to Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union, has changed his position. Now Guttenberg, who holds the rank of corporal in the reserves, told SPIEGEL in an interview that "in practice (military service) will be gone in 10 years."

With this statement, Guttenberg antagonized members of his own party, especially Volker Kauder, the floor leader of the conservatives' parliamentary group. Kauder says that compulsory military service is a core concern of his party, the CDU, and that it is an "instrument for linking society with the Bundeswehr." CSU leader Horst Seehofer, who characterizes his party as "a party of the Bundeswehr," says: "We say yes to compulsory military service." Chancellor Angela Merkel, who considers compulsory military service a "success story," reined in the defense minister, because she believes that a large proportion of her voters support military service.

Outdated

These are the old, familiar rituals once again. Compulsory military service has always been one of the great taboos of German politics. Until the 1980s, hundreds of thousands of men were still needed in case a massive army had to be quickly mobilized to face off against the forces of the Warsaw Pact. But with the implosion of the Eastern Bloc and the end of the Cold War, conscription has become outdated.

For Germany, a country surrounded by friendly neighbors, national defense is hardly a concern anymore. Bundeswehr soldiers are now fighting in Afghanistan or overseeing a weapons embargo off the coast of Lebanon as part of the United Nations' UNIFIL force. The army's young conscripts are of no use to anyone. Poorly trained and neglected by the government, they spend much of their military service killing time.

But now there is some hope that things could change, because the government has to tighten its belt. Without the funds to support it, the draft will probably soon cease to exist. Officials at the Defense Ministry have calculated that the Bundeswehr would cost the government almost €500 million ($610 million) less per year if military service were abolished.

Currently, compulsory military service lasts nine months, which consists of three months of basic training and six months spent at a barracks somewhere in Germany. Six months at a barracks doesn't necessarily seem like a long time, but it can feel a lot longer for people who don't know what they are supposed to do with themselves. In fact, no one knows what they are supposed to do. David, the enthusiastic young conscript, didn't know, his fellow members of the logistics battalion don't know and hardly any of the roughly 60,000 German conscripts knows. Not even the Bundeswehr itself knows.

Dawdling Away the Days

This is why many conscripts, after completing basic training, learn how to spend time when there is nothing to do. They learn how to dawdle away hours, days, weeks and months, how to waste time running errands and sitting in office chairs, and they learn how to daydream in their units and offices, in hallways, rooms and barrack yards. Essentially, they learn how to loaf around. In the process, they become lazy, silly or creative, or sometimes all three. They do things like hold sleeping bag races, which they record with their mobile phone cameras. The Internet is full of such videos.

Seen in a positive light, compulsory military service is a gigantic, nine-month-long party for a bunch of young men (women are exempt from conscription in Germany). But what's the point of it all? What was the purpose of the government calling up 63,413 men for military service last year? Why does the state intervene in the lives of so many young people, even though it cannot explain to them what exactly they are supposed to do once they've arrived at their barracks?

Many conscripts believe that the government knows very well why it is drafting them and depriving them of their freedom for nine months. But the truth is more banal than that: It doesn't know. If it did, it would treat the young men differently. Five decades after it was introduced, the German draft has turned into a huge machine that is fed with young men and produces government-organized mass unemployment in the barracks.

The soldiers have come up with a word for the kind of activity that serves the sole purpose of making it seem as if they were busy. They call it Dummfick (loosely translatable as "stupid fucking around").

Cleaning Clean Guns

Shortly after reporting for duty to his logistics battalion, David was ordered to clean some guns. There was only one problem: The guns were already clean. In fact, they had never been used. Some would say it was meant to be practice, but David had already learned how to clean guns in basic training. Nevertheless, he sat down on a chair in front of the weapons room, a clean MG 3 machine gun in front of him, and took apart, polished and reassembled it. Taking things apart, cleaning them, and putting them back together, hour after hour, day after day -- that's how conscripts spend their time.


To make matters worse, says David, the barracks were completely full, with four bunk beds in each room. Some of his fellow soldiers had to store their equipment in the attic because there wasn't any space for additional cupboards in the room.

After graduating from high school, David, who comes from a small town in the western state of Hesse, was tempted by the prospect of getting a university education at the Bundeswehr and pursuing a career as an officer in the air force. His euphoria didn't last long. After two weeks, he was transferred from the weapons room to the company's business office, where there was just as little to do.

At least he didn't suffer the fate of a recruit in a transport battalion in western Germany, who was assigned to guard a telephone and answer official calls coming in to the phone. It was a monotonous task, because the phone never rang -- for weeks on end. It wasn't until a supervisor had the office furniture moved around that the soldier noticed the outlet behind a cupboard. As it turned out, the phone wasn't even plugged in.

LINK

LINK to PART 2 'Hanging-Around Service'

 
Here is a more detailed compilation of possible "reforms" from BansheeOne of Tanknet. It doesn´t look good :'(:
We will get some semi-hard facts on where the train is headed on the 23rd, when Defense Minister zu Guttenberg will inform parlamentarians about the plans. However, the grapevine already shows a general picture.

Five models on future force structure were investigated, from the minimum 150,000-man all-professional to a 205,000-man Bundeswehr cutting the maximum amount of 40,000 contract soldiers while retaining conscription in its current form (about to be reduced to a mere six-month term come January 2011). The first has been judged incapable of fulfilling the obligations of German security policy while the last is considered unaffordable under the impending budget cuts forced by the debt cap recently entered into the constitution. The actual result will be somewhere in between.

Zu Guttenberg seems to have settled on a model including at least 156,000 contract soldiers, 7,500 „short-timers“ (in effect conscripts that have agreed to actually serve for a maximum of less than two years like the current „voluntary extended service conscripts“) and a planning margin of 5,000. Total strength will therefore be between 163,500 and 168,500. The draft will be kept on the books, but only those volunteers would actually be inducted. The blue-ribbon commission tasked with developing a streamlined force model has suggested there is a total potential of 15,000-20,000 short-timers to be recruited from society, so higher gross numbers are mentioned too; but for now a Bundeswehr of ca. 165,000 seems the most likely.

One focus of the reform is alleged to be trimming the fat at the top, since the number of multi-star commands and MOD bureaucrats has not shrunken much at all while line units kept getting cut. Plans seem to include to scratch one of the two defense state secretary posts and giving the Inspector General of the Bundeswehr more authority, while downgrading the inspectors of the forces (army, air force, navy, central services, medical) out of the ministry. Medical is likely to be integrated with central services.

That way, there would be one civilian and one military branch in the MOD. Elevating the IG like that is slightly controversial; though not as much as some years ago when the first small bits of actual command authority bestowed upon the post triggered all sorts of history-based hysteria about possible re-introduction of a Generalstab. Unsurprisingly, the MOD bureaucracy is fighting back right now, too.

It is dearly hoped that the multitude of higher commands pushing and shoving to lead scarce forces will be eliminated in the current process. It is already indicated that the divsion level as it is now will be abolished in the army and air force. Instead, there will be a total of four two-star joint forces commands, which will also include the current four current territorial commands of the central services. The distinction into „intervention“ and „stabilisation“ forces, meaningless in reality, will go away.

As for equipment, there was a “Priority List On Materiél Investions“ leaked from the MOD last month which contained substantial cuts. The ministry hastened to point out is was only a working paper, and the document itself stressed that all actual decisions where subject to the executive and parliamentary political process. However, it also said it was created before the cabinet order to investigate a cut of up to 40,000 professional soldiers, and depending upon actual reduction in strength there might actually be even more capability cuts. Its most important parts:


Land systems:

- Reduce Leopard 2 to 271, investigate cuts of 2A7 upgrade

- Reduce Puma order to 280

- Preliminarily keep Boxer APC variant at 125, re-appropriate 26 of the second lot of ambulance variant (i.e. total 151?)

- Phase out M113 (noooooooo!!!!)

- Reduce Fuchs to „deployment-relevant“ number including temporarily limited alternative to Boxer

- „Significantly“ reduce Bergepanzer 2 LS ARV to deployment-relevant number

- „Significantly“ reduce Dachs AEV to deployment-relevant number

- Reduce Bv 206 D to deployment-relevant number

- Reduce PzH 2000 to 80

- Reduce MLRS to 24, but upgrade all of them with European Fire Control System for GMLRS

- Preliminarily cancel WaBEP loitering combat drone (Israeli Harop)

- Keep current order for Wiesel 2 mortar system (74 mortar carriers, 36 FCV)

- Reduce airmobile forces permitting loss of capability to simultaneously conduct EvacOps and neutralisation of irregular forces

- Cut number of Wiesel 1 in airmobile forces to 37 with 20 mm AC, 18 with TOW (does not extend to other light infantry formations)

- No further procurement of Mungo

- No procurement of Protected Command and Utility Vehicle Class 4 (Wisent) and Protected Transport Vehicle 9 t except for indispensable functions

- Procure unprotected vehicles only COTS anymore

- Procure 582 „new rifles“ supplementing G 36 (likely 7.62 mm HK 417 as G 27)

- Accelerated procurement of infantry night vision equipment.

- Procure four units of MANTIS C-RAM system (Oerlikon Skyshield)

- Develop New Generation light air defense missile, but preliminarily forego mobile part of SysFla army air defense system

- Phase out Patriot beginning in 2011 already, procure eight units of MEADS; if the latter cannot be realised, investigate integration of SM-3 into Type 124 frigates to take over missile defense mission.



Aircraft:

- Cut resp. Pass on for export tranche 3b of Eurofighter (37) for a total of 140; integration of AESA radar necessary

- Reduce current number of 44 Phantom II to a squadron equivalent of about 23 by mid-2011, phase out after Eurofighter can fully take over air policing ca. end of 2013

- Reduce Tornado from 185 to 85 faster as planned (previously 2017), keep up Nuclear Participation in NATO

- Investigate possible reduction of A400M order (numbers of ca. 45-50 instead of 60 thrown around)

- Immediately reduce number of Transalls by 15 plus X, X being the reduction in A400Ms

- Reduce total order of 122 NH 90 helicopters for army and air force to 80; create „synergies“ by putting rotary wing assets under joint operational control on the UK model

- No procurement of MH 90 navy variant for now, instead upgrade Sea King fleet to fly until 2025

- Reduce Tiger attack helicopter order from 80 to 40

- Significantly reduce BO 105 and UH-1D to minimum number required to train and keep on flight status future NH 90 and Tiger crews

- Forego planned CSAR capability for less demanding „Extended Personnel Recovery“ based upon existing CH-53

- Significantly reduce number of ready-to-use Taurus cruise missiles, investigate ways to quickly re-activate inactivated missiles for use

- Delay integration of Taurus with Eurofighter, investigate use of other carrier platforms including A400M

- Reduce Meteor AAM order commencing in 2011 from 603 to 150

- Reduce GBU-48 order for Eurofighter from 704 to 175

- Transfer anti-ship role from Tornado to Orion MPA including re-winging of the latter; will have to use LGB when Kormoran 2 AShM reaches end of certification in 2012

- Phase out wet-film recce pods for Tornado, limit procurement of digital Recce Lite pod to currently planned number of eight

- Cancel development of EADS Talarion MALE AGV; immediately procure system based upon Heron 1 currently leased from Israel (might be Heron TP/Eitan), but reduce planned number from 22 to 16 systems

- Procure total of five EuroHawk SIGINT UAVs, permitting 15 month gap after phase-out of Breguet Atlantic; will eventually also take over role of the navy's three ELINT vessels, not to be replaced

- Reduce participation in NATO AGS Core from six to four Global Hawk systems

- Procure initial equipment of army and navy with VTOL UAV (likely Schiebel S-100 Camcopter)

- Develop successor system to current SAR Lupe radar recon satellite system with reduced capabilities vis-a-vis original plans; secure access to optical sat imagery by financial contribution to French CSO system.


Ships:

- Possibly replace the eight Type 122 frigates by only three instead of four F 125 (newer reports indicate this is off the table)

- Decommission last six Type 206A submarines (already taken out of readiness), re-assign crews for rotation on Type 212As; procurement of fifth and six U 212A looks safe

- Decommission last ten Type 143A fast-attack craft as soon as possible, re-assign crews to rotation/new crews of incoming corvettes

- Procure six if possible OTS corvettes (MEKO 100 is likely) beginning in 2015 at the latest

- Decommission all five Type 352 minehunting drone control vessels and eight Seehund drones when Type 130 corvette reaches operational readiness, re-assign crews for rotation on MJ 332s and 333s; equip MJ 332 for control of remaining ten Seehunde

- Decomission two Type 332 patrol boats of Navy Protection Forces, rebuild other two as diver deployment boats to replace old Langeoog

- Delay procurement of Joint Support Ship for amphibious operations (again)

- Third Type 702 AOR not mentioned and seems safe; lately even mention of two new fleet tankers to replace old single-hull vessels which are no longer allowed to come into many international ports.


The overall picture that emerges will likely resemble the following:


The Heer wants six identically-structured, infantry-strong brigades which can deal with the whole spectrum of operations (but are based upon the current Stabilisation Brigades) and rotate through deployments. The plan is to raise six new infantry battalions, though this might turn out to be partly a shell game. In addition, they want to keep the current capabilities for Special and EvacOps, combat against irregular forces and the German participation in the French-German Brigade.

Those six brigades will probably look big and diverse, having one each of a

- Panzer battalion (total of six as before, but maybe companies reduced back to 13 instead of 14 tanks considering the need for training and technical reserve?)

- Panzergrenadier battalion (down from eight)

- Jäger battalion

- RSTA battalion

- Pionier battalion

- Signal battalion

- Logistics battalion

but no organic artillery. As the remaining PzH 2000 and MLRS only allow for eight or nine batteries overall, most (excluding the mixed battalion of the French-German Brigade?) will probably migrate to the Army Troops Brigade to join NBC. There are also rumors that the army is getting out of air defense completely and MANTIS will be pushed over to the air force; I was surprised the priority list stuck to SysFla LFK NG. OTOH, formations will apparently have organic medical units again, since deployments have highlighted the need for joint training.

One of the current two airborne brigades is likely to be re-roled into the above, the other will probably merge with 1st Airmobile Brigade on the model of the British 16 Air Assault Brigade with rotary wing assets supplied by a „Joint Helicopter Command“; but at least it will have three instead of two line battalions, going by the Wiesel numbers from the priority list. The KSK is reported to come under direct control of Special Operations Command along with the navy's Kampfschwimmer.

The Mountain Brigade will probably stay due to its specialisation on fighting in restricted terrain. The French-German Brigade is already getting an additional mixed Jäger/Recon battalion, to be permanently based near Strasbourg in France for the first time. This would make for a total of 14 light infantry battalions, up from nine (counting Jägerregiment 1 as the re-inforced battalion it really is) – two of which would be converted from Panzergrenadiers. Not quite the six new battalions planned. Also, the priority list is curiously silent of the Wiesels that would be needed for their Heavy Companies.


The Luftwaffe appears to be the hardest hit of the traditional forces by personnel reductions, probably owing to the reality of current missions. 140 Eurofighters will equip a total of three wings (minus one), one of which will be JaboG 31; there are however demands that all EF wings should eventually be dual role AtA/AtG. JaboG 32 runs the 35 HARM-equipped ECR Tornados along with some IDS and will probably stay.

I'm not so sure about JaboG 33 which has the Nuclear Participation role. This is not a popular issue and only lukewarmly defended by a few Atlanticists in the Conservatives, and even fewer in the Social Democrats. The current official line seems to amount to „eventually Tornado will be replaced by Eurofighter which is not certified for nuclear weapons, and then we're shot of this troublesome stuff anyway“. I foresee this being high on the list when the search for additional possibilities to save a buck starts, German influence in NATO's nuclear planning be damned.

Another likely candidate is MEADS. Raytheon has been making the rounds through MP offices advertising an upgrade of Patriot to 90 percent of MEADS' capabilities, for far less money and with the same German industrial partners. Needless to say, they encountered great sympathy. It was another surprise for me the MOD considers missile defense so important they think of SM-3 integration into F 124 as a backup plan.

AG 51 is set to become a pure UAV unit if they lose the anti-shipping role; the priority list doesn't say the mere eight remaining recce pods have to be carried by Recce Tornados.


The Marine comes off best in comparison, either by being the smallest force already with not much personnel to cut anymore, or owing to the realisation that an export-oriented economy like Germany's is dependant on free SLOCs. It's questionable whether 10-11 frigates and 11 corvettes will justify keeping two squadrons each; the remaining minehunters will rather surely be concentrated in one squadron. The navy still hopes to get back up to eight submarines, but I don't think this very likely in the mid-term. An amphibious capability, ghosting around in varios guises since the early 90s, will probably never materialise. At least the reduction in hulls will allow to dispense with the grossly overaged supply units.

OTOH the acquistion of new navy helicopters is now officially so FUBARed they have to keep the tired old Sea Kings flying unto 2025. Eurocopter dropped the ball on the MH 90 even more resoundingly than on the NH variant, and the S-92 apparently doesn't look too attractive due to the CH-148's own problems with its introduction in Canada. At least we're not following the Dutch model and get rid of the Orion MPA fleet we took over from them – even if it appears they'll have to take over ant-shipping with LGBs for lack of usable AShMs.

Again, all this subject to actual executive and parliamentary decisions in the next months. For one thing the Conservatives, being the last party adhering to general consription, have trouble with the "voluntary draftees" thing that is basically a Social Democratic concept they ridiculed only two years ago.

Regards,
ironduke57
 
No more conscription for Bundeswehr?

Germany Plans Major Restructuring of Military
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/world/europe/24iht-germany.html

BERLIN — Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg on Monday unveiled plans to restructure Germany’s armed forces in what is regarded as one of the most radical military shake-ups since the end of the Cold War.

The measures include ending conscription, reducing the Bundeswehr, or armed forces, to 163,000 from 250,000 and streamlining the command structures. The goal is to turn the military into a highly professional and flexible corps.

“The Bundeswehr will be smaller and more capable,” Mr. Guttenberg said in a brief statement after explaining his proposals to the parliamentary factions, adding that the final details would be worked out over the next few months. “This is now the beginning of a really important debate.”..

Mr. Guttenberg hopes that by reducing the standing army by nearly 90,000 troops, he can find more and better-trained soldiers to serve in NATO or E.U. international missions.

Mr. Guttenberg said that at the moment, despite having such a large army, the armed forces could provide only up to 7,000 troops to serve in five missions at any given time [emphasis added].

Yet five years ago, the Defense Ministry set itself the goal of being able to draw on 14,000 soldiers from a pool of 70,000 well-trained troops.

“This level of ambition could not be reached,” Mr. Guttenberg said in a major speech he gave in April to the country’s top military academy in Hamburg.

The package of changes, which will include closing many of the 403 barracks as well as slimming down the 9 separate military commands, means that Mr. Guttenberg will be able to offer better pay and more incentives in order to attract more qualified recruits... 

...over the years, the majority of recruits who had been called up opted for community service instead. It is still unclear how the latter will be affected. That, too, may be turned into a voluntary system, according to the ministry for social and family affairs.

...Mr. Guttenberg seized on Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble’s savings plan to forge ahead with his defense changes.

Mr. Schäuble is seeking savings of €80 billion, or about $102 billion, between 2011 and 2014. Under pressure to find cuts in his own ministry, Mr. Guttenberg said the armed forces would have to save as much as €8 billion [emphasis added] over that time...

Mark
Ottawa
 
More at Spiegel Online:

Germany Weighs the Elimination of Conscription
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,713539,00.html#ref=nlint

German Defense Minister Guttenberg has proposed eliminating mandatory conscription and radically reducing the size of the country's armed forces. The move would also put an end to mandatory civil service for conscientious objectors. Editorialists are as conflicted by Guttenberg's proposals as the German government.

On Monday, German Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg unveiled his proposal to reform the German armed forces, the Bundeswehr, as part of his country's ambitious savings measures. In coming up with savings potential for Guttenberg's €31 billion ($39 billion) Defense Ministry budget, he called into question fundamental military structures.

He is calling for Germany's mandatory conscription to be maintained in the constitution but for it to be phased out in practice starting in mid-2011 [emphasis added]. Under the proposal, the army would shrink from its current size of 252,000 soldiers to around 165,000. Some 7,500 of those would be "volunteers" -- non-professional soldiers who serve for a term of between 12 and 23 months. The debate over eliminating mandatory conscription has been a divisive one in Germany in recent months, with prominent members of Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), of which Guttenberg is a member, claiming that mandatory military service is part of Germany's culture and that the practice should be maintained.

Guttenberg has been ordered by the Finance Ministry to come up with €8.2 billion in savings at the Defense Ministry, but SPIEGEL reported on Monday that the restructuring of the Bundeswehr as a volunteer and professional army would only reduce spending by €1.5 billion [emphasis added].

A Broad Debate...

Mark
Ottawa
 
Armies across NATO are/have reduced significantly since 1990, "die Wende" as Germany calls it (the "Change").  The Federal Republic had a total of 11 Panzer and Panzergrenadier Divisions in 1989, and the German Democractic Republic had one tank and four Motor Rifle divisions.  That's a lot of divisions!  Now they are going to a handful of brigades.

My question: why does Canada have virtually the same sized Land Force that it did in 1989?  Using Infantry as an example:
1989:
3 x Mechanised Brigade Groups (1, 4 and 5) with a total of eight infantry battalions, plus two more infantry battalions (1 RCR, CAR) in the Special Service Force (SSF).

2010:
3 x Mechanised Brigade Groups (1, 2 and 5) with a total of nine infantry battalions, plus two "battalion-like entities) in CANSOFCOM.

So, have we situated the estimate by saying that we can support a deployment of "x" if we have a force the size of "y", where y=our current force size?  Or did we say we need a force the size of "y" in order to support a deployment of "x", where "y"=our current force size?

I am of the opinion that we have situated the estimate.  A quick swag on my part would suggest that six infantry battalions across 3 brigades would be sufficient to conduct operations at the current pace IF those infantry battalions (and all other units!!!) were at establishment strength.  One way to do that would be to eliminate 1 x Bn per infantry regiment.  That would give us 18 Full Up Infantry Companies, 6 x Full Up Combat Sp Companies, 6 x Full Up Logistics Companies and 6 x Full Up Battalion Headquarters.  But that is just a swag.  A proper estimate could reveal that we need 9 full up brigades ;D


 
The problem is that those "full up" battalions would not remain "full up" for long, and pretty shortly after the "reform" they'd be six battalions in the same state as the nine that we have today.
 
Alternatively, we could move to four lean CMBG HQs to provide both internationally and domestically deployable C2, each with 2 Bns of Inf (move 2 PPCLI from Shilo, rebadge them along with 2 RCR as Black Watch), give the ASGs over to a support brigade, put the five reg F Bdes under 1 Div HQ...

In parallel, have a Reserve Div HQ (largely manned by Reg F) to step up when I Can Div HQ is deployed (and to provide depth) over 4 Reserve CBGs (parallelling the Reg F CMBGs for training opportunities / cross pollination / augmenttion if/when required).

Of course, this means the loss of the 4 Areas.  Hands up anyone who will cry.

 
Is our strategic operational requirement something like:

1. one battle group (1,250+/- soldiers, includes organic adm and log support 'tail') for sustained operations - 30 months plus; plus

2. a support element for that battle group that grows, during the 30 months, to 750+/- soldiers; plus

3. one battle group (1,250+/- soldiers, with organic adm and log support) ready to deploy for one six month tour of duty after a brief (less than 30 days) warning period?


Edit: added "something like"[color]
 
Technoviking said:
Armies across NATO are/have reduced significantly since 1990, "die Wende" as Germany calls it (the "Change").  The Federal Republic had a total of 11 Panzer and Panzergrenadier Divisions in 1989, and the German Democractic Republic had one tank and four Motor Rifle divisions.  That's a lot of divisions!  Now they are going to a handful of brigades.
...

Looking how our politicians want a bigger say in the UNSC and such maybe we should go the other way. Back to the BW+NVA numbers. Then send 3-4 divisions to northern Astan and we will see how long it takes to bring the situation under control.

(And after this we make some holidays in Paris! ;D (Or Rome? Madrid? We will see. >:D)

Regards,
ironduke57 ;)
 
Hey, ironduke, if you do, ensure you use Muslim soldiers:

foreign-soldiers-german-nazi-army-wehrmacht-ww2-second-world-war-amazing-incredible-dramtic-pics-pictures-photos-image-turkmenistanis.jpg


Then you can relax in Paris:

Wehrmacht_Paris_3.jpg



Hey, maybe even re-enact the 1940 Tour de France:

tour_de_france_1940.jpg


;D

 
More on shrinking, including A400M:

1) German Committee Recommends Cutbacks in Defense Spending
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/25/world/europe/25iht-germany.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

As major European countries seek to cut military forces in response to the economic slowdown and pressure from finance officials to rein in spending, the Defense Ministry of Germany has been advised to cut its staff by half, close several army bases and slim the armed forces from 250,000 to 180,000.

The recommendations were announced Sunday by Frank-Jürgen Weise, the head of a special cross-party commission charged with restructuring Germany’s military.

Mr. Weise’s proposal is likely to bolster efforts by Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, who was appointed defense minister just over a year ago, to transform the German military. He has already abolished conscription despite strong opposition from his conservative bloc — the Christian Democratic Union party and the Christian Social Union party...

The government of Chancellor Angela Merkel has said that it intended to save as much as €80 billion, or $111 billion, by 2013. The Defense Ministry, which currently spends about €30 billion a year, is supposed to contribute €9.3 billion over the next three years toward that goal...

To achieve savings on military equipment, Mr. Guttenberg has been looking at procurement projects like the Tiger helicopter manufactured by EADS and the NH90 transport helicopter. Germany has complained about delays and quality on both of those.

Germany is also considering whether it will reduce the number of A400M military transport aircraft, a joint enterprise with other European countries... 

2) Germany Confirms A400M Agreement
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/asd/2010/10/26/01.xml

Germany will take only 53 of the 60 Airbus Military A400Ms originally on order, German government sources indicated on Oct. 25.

A400M customers continue to chip away at the commitment of 180 units that was negotiated as part of a general settlement reached in March. With the U.K. planning to cut its commitment by three aircraft, the total program now totals 170 aircraft [emphasis added]...

Mark
Ottawa
 
Airbus have no-one but themselves (and Europrop) to blame for losing orders. Hard to cancel orders for aircraft that were delivered in a reasonable timeframe, and have been on the ramp for 5 years.

 
Germany to abolish compulsory military service

The German government has announced plans to abolish compulsory military service by next summer, marking the most radical overhaul of the armed forces since its postwar founding and a major change to German society.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/22/germany-abolish-compulsory-military-service
 
Good. Any time involuntary servitude of any sort is ended it's a good thing for freedom.
 
Back
Top