• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

C.O.‘s in Alleged Fraud of Reg. Fund‘s.

Spr.Earl

Army.ca Veteran
Inactive
Reaction score
2
Points
410
Seaforth ex-chiefs probed in alleged scam
Former COs took regimental funds - search warrant

Jason Proctor
The Province



Canadian military police are investigating whether two previous commanding officers of the Seaforth Highlanders misappropriated more than $45,000 worth of funds from a foundation set up to benefit the reserve regiment.

A search warrant obtained by The Province alleges that money from the Seaforth Highlanders of Canada Regimental Fund was placed directly into the personal accounts of Donald Chipman and his successor, Peter Thomas.

The secretary/treasurer of the organization -- Michael Shields -- is also named in the court document.

"A preliminary financial audit of the Seaforth Highlanders of Canada‘s Regimental Fund revealed that between March 1997 and December 2000, multiple breaches of Canadian Forces administrative and financial regulations had taken place," reads the information filed to obtain the warrant.

"The findings also indicated that a significant amount of money could not be accounted for and may have been stolen or misappropriated."

No charges have been laid against any of the men named in the warrant.

But spokesman Capt. Mark Giles confirmed Friday that the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service is conducting an investigation in the Vancouver area.

Chipman served as commanding officer of the Seaforth Highlanders between May 26, 1996, and Sept. 18, 1999. Thomas succeeded him, serving until May 11, 2002.

"There was no misappropriation of funds," Chipman told The Province.

"I‘ll wait until they ask me -- and answer their questions."

The Seaforth Highlanders of Canada Regimental Fund is a charitable organization managed by the Vancouver Foundation, which in turn pays dividends back to the the regiment.

According to the warrant, the investigation follows a paper trail that found that cheques equal to the amounts being written to the regiment were then signed over to "the Commanding Officers Fund."

The warrant claims that $25,000 of that money went into Chipman‘s personal VanCity account and $20,000 went into Thomas‘ account at Canada Trust.

Bank records for Chipman indicate that he then paid hydro and insurance bills and made a loan repayment.

He also allegedly received $817.06 from the fund for repairs to the mirror assemblies of his 1992 Ford Explorer sport utility vehicle.

Investigators were hoping to review Thomas‘ bank statements as well.

[email protected]
 
Yeah, I had to read about that one in the paper too. I just hope that the media (and Canada) see that this is a problem with 2 people, and not with the unit in general.

That being said, this whole incident came as a heck of a shock to a lot of us.
 
I regret to say that it happens. I was serving with the West Nova Scotia Regiment in the early ninties and we had a CO who was accused of the same thing. While the unit was struggling with shrinking budgets, he was allegedly siphoning off funds for himself.

Instead of being officially charged, he was allowed to retire with no blemishes on his record, therby allowing him to later continue his career with no-one the wiser. In my opinion, completely the wrong approach to the problem.

Incidentally, he had been accused of the same thing when he served with the PLF, and since there was little or no paperwork to substantiate that either, each new accusation started "from scratch."

To make matters worse, the RSSO who blew the whistle on him was shuffled out of the unit and effectively reprimanded.

Someone in a position of power and trust that abuses it to the detriment of the soldiers does not deserve the second chances and breaks that this guy got... :mad:
 
And then there is the story of the little Engineer unit that took the hit because they wouldn‘t play the District Comd‘s game. IE pay into his fund and they found themselves the subject of a massive fraud investigation. All assetts, material and financial seized, unit disbanded.

The investigation was allowed to die, many questions where never answered and ironically those special funds live on. My favourite has always been the one in the CDS‘s office. Hmm.

Pity
 
The CO‘s name in the WNSR was LCol Himmleman. And I believe he used the $ to help finance his failing real estate company. He completely got away with it and is still invited to Unit functions. Disgraceful.

:sniper:
 
Combat Medic you have no worries as the average mucker know‘s and respect‘s the Froth,Bull Winkle‘s etc.

It‘s not we worker bee‘s it‘s the wana bee Queen‘s who mess it up.
 
BINGO, called by the guy in the back near the dear sweat ole girls from Winnipeg...
 
Then there was the story of a CO in Toronto, who used Regimental funds to pay his mortgage.

The Honouraries hushed it up, swept it under the carpet, and allowed him to finish his tenure (not sure who made restitution for the funds).

Ironically, the following CO was fired for piddling reasons (he took the Army to court, and won his wrongful dismissal suit).

Even more ironically, the mortgage CO was ex-Reg, and therefore the Regiment had less reason to be so loyal to him - whereas the fired CO was a died-in-the-wool Regimental guy - he lived, breathed, and existed only to serve the Regiment.

Funny how these things happen, eh?
 
There is something fishy about COs and real estate... Arthur Currie experienced similar problems after he returned from WW1, and he paid the price. I guess today‘s COs are much more deserving than Currie, so they get special treatment... They should be severely punished, as examples (Isn‘t that what they like to say when they charge NCMs ???) :cdn:
 
You know, a funny thing happened in a mess meeting circa spring 1998. I alluded to some misapropriations of NPF at the Regiment and espoused upon a feeling amongst some members regarding the honesty of the leadership in our building.

The CO charged me (129) for both comments as his method of refutement. I suppose he‘ll have trouble charging civvies under the NDA for the same comments or allegations.

This particular incident at Seaforth is a little deeper than the newspaper lets on. The whole mess was discovered by a Seaforth WO (Fin Clerk)working at 39CBG HQ. . . .

It‘s a whole soap opera now!
 
Back
Top