Haggis
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 4,270
- Points
- 1,140
For those with TLDR, a CAF MP MWO is suing over an alleged defect in the C22 pistol that cause him a career-ending injury.

Range shooting is training, so it is possible.My only question is, are they training with the weapon with a round in the spout? The thing doesn't have a safety, so....
Yes, that is my understanding. Since the MPs need to carry with a round chambered, they need to do holster drills that way, too. I guess.My only question is, are they training with the weapon with a round in the spout? The thing doesn't have a safety, so....
Correction this was not a C22, this was an earlier model P320 similar to what the USAF uses. The official investigation put no blame onto the pistol itself, though this incident is one of the reasons why there is only 1 allowed holster for the C22.For those with TLDR, a CAF MP MWO is suing over an alleged defect in the C22 pistol that cause him a career-ending injury.
Since the MPs need to carry with a round chambered, they need to do holster drills that way, too. I guess.
Potentially that is what the Govt will have to explain in court.Do they need to? (genuine question). If so, why don't police have a pistol with a safety?
Because when we need a pistol we may need it right the hell already, and an external safety is a fine motor skill that could easily not work well in that critical moment. It also means movement of the thumb which is trying to play a critical role in a strong, stable grip. External safeties are arguably obsolete for fighting pistols. I’m not saying there aren’t any police services out there with a pistol with external safety, but I couldn’t name one.Do they need to? (genuine question). If so, why don't police have a pistol with a safety?
Concur. If you need a pistol, you need one in the chamber, and your training should be up to that task.Yes all police carry a round chambered.
The rest of the military should also, and I thought they did until I read some of these comments here…
I would be completely unsurprised if this was a case of something maybe getting snagged in the holster.Correction this was not a C22, this was an earlier model P320 similar to what the USAF uses. The official investigation put no blame onto the pistol itself, though this incident is one of the reasons why there is only 1 allowed holster for the C22.
Do they need to? (genuine question). If so, why don't police have a pistol with a safety?
Frankly if Brink's and G4S can have people driving around with chambered rounds anyone can.
This!Because when we need a pistol we may need it right the hell already, and an external safety is a fine motor skill that could easily not work well in that critical moment. It also means movement of the thumb which is trying to play a critical role in a strong, stable grip. External safeties are arguably obsolete for fighting pistols. I’m not saying there aren’t any police services out there with a pistol with external safety, but I couldn’t name one.
Quite possible as that was apprently the case with the occurence at DHTC.I would be completely unsurprised if this was a case of something maybe getting snagged in the holster.
The C-22 pistol — the Canadian variant of the P320 — is at the centre of multiple injury claims and lawsuits in the United States.