• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Calls to Upgrade Fallen Marine's Navy Cross to Medal of Honor

  • Thread starter Thread starter D-n-A
  • Start date Start date
http://www.armytimes.com/issues/stories/0-ARMYPAPER-3084939.php

Why not me?

Saved by a comrade’s selfless act, survivors struggle to cope, measure up
By Gregg Zoroya -
Posted : October 15, 2007

Army Staff Sgt. Ian Newland spotted the enemy grenade inside the Humvee. Almost simultaneously, he saw Spc. Ross McGinnis, 19 — a gunner standing in the turret of the vehicle — lower himself onto it.

“I saw him jam it with his elbow up underneath him,” said Newland, who was sitting inches away. “He pressed his whole body with his back [armor] plate to smother it up against the radios.”

The heat and flash of an explosion followed, and McGinnis was killed. Hours later, after surgery for shrapnel wounds, Newland realized the enormity of what happened: McGinnis had sacrificed himself to save four other soldiers in the Humvee on Dec. 4.

“Why he did it? Because we were his brothers. He loved us,” Newland said.

Since the Iraq war began, at least five Americans — two soldiers, two Marines and a Navy SEAL — are believed to have thrown themselves on a grenade to save comrades. Each time, the service member died from massive wounds.

Heroic acts mark every war; among the most remarkable involve self-sacrifice.

“What a decision that is,” said Frank Farley, a Temple University psychologist who studies bravery. “I can’t think of anything more profound in human nature.”

Survivors, while deeply grateful for their lives, find the aftermath complicated. According to interviews with a dozen surviving soldiers, sailors and Marines, there remains an overpowering sense of guilt and an unspoken feeling that they need to be worthy of the sacrifice.

“There’s always talk [in the Army] about being the hero,” said Newland, 27, now in Schweinfurt, Germany. He has been diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder from the December blast.

In the military, “everyone always tells their friends, ‘I’d take a bullet for you,’” Newland said. “I’ve read books and seen plenty of movies about it. But to actually live through a situation like that, have someone do that, is just — there’s nothing else more courageous that a person can do in their entire life. ... So basically, I try not to live my life in vain for what he’s done.”

Such heroic acts almost always lead to a military review for the Medal of Honor, the highest military decoration.

The medal was awarded posthumously in the first instance of such heroism in Iraq, to Marine Cpl. Jason Dunham, 22, of Scio, N.Y. He covered a grenade with his helmet April 14, 2004, and saved the lives of two Marines in western Iraq. Dunham died eight days later.
‘I have to prove myself worthy’

A person who wraps himself around an explosive charge cannot block all of its destructive power.

Survivors caught nearby describe intense heat, a shattering pressure wave, dazed awareness, ringing ears or even bursting eardrums, and a world around them that sounds for several seconds as if it’s underwater. Then there’s the blood — from muscles, nerves or arteries slashed by shrapnel.

That’s just the physical harm.

Emotional damage surfaces later, when a survivor tries to square his life with his friend’s death, said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Shannon Johnson, who counsels front-line combat soldiers in Baghdad.

“The guilt that those left behind have is sometimes compounded by a sense of unworthiness,” she said. “They cannot accept that their lives were worth more than the life of their loved comrade. They are left with the heavy burden of trying to measure up to the great sacrifice so that they could live on. For some, the burden is too much.”

On the battlefield, the military tries to provide counseling for survivors whenever lives are lost.

At home, therapists with the Department of Veterans Affairs say survivor’s guilt is among the common issues troops bring home from war.

“Being saved by someone from heroics could lead to a sort of” emotional crisis, said Ira Katz, head of mental health for VA. “‘He died for me. I really have to prove myself worthy.’ And that’s probably a very natural response.”

In September 2006, Petty Officer 2nd Class (SEAL) Michael Monsoor, 25, of Garden Grove, Calif., fell on a grenade that landed on a rooftop in Ramadi, Iraq, where he and two other Navy SEALs were stationed as part of a sniper team. Monsoor saved the lives of the other two.

“You think about him every day. And everything pretty much revolves around what he did,” said a 29-year-old Navy lieutenant with the SEALs, married and the father of one. He declined to be identified as a matter of department policy. “You’d like to tell yourself that you’d do what Mikey did. But until you’re faced with that situation, you really don’t know.”

Sally Monsoor, a social worker from Garden Grove, Calif., remembers first meeting two SEALs saved by her son’s heroism in Iraq. “I told them to just be as good a person as you can be and good fathers and good family men and do the jobs you need to do because Mike felt you were worth it,” she recalled.

Later, she reflected on her remarks and felt terrible. “I started thinking, ‘Have I really put more pressure on these men?’”

Marine Sgt. Nicholas Jones still questions his own worth after a nearly identical experience two years before in Fallujah.

Jones entered a house defended by insurgents when his best friend, Sgt. Rafael Peralta, fell in front of him with a gunshot wound to the neck. Seconds later, an enemy grenade landed near Peralta, who grabbed it and pulled it underneath his chest. The blast killed Peralta immediately. Four other Marines, including Jones, were wounded.

“It’s weird to think you get a second chance on life because of someone’s unselfishness,” said Jones, 24, of Ontario, Calif., who suffered shrapnel wounds in the explosion.

“It almost makes you feel less, you know? Less of a person. It’s like: Why did somebody go out and do something so unselfish just so that I could have the rest of my life?”
Trouble coping

Some survivors have nearly been destroyed in the wake of being saved.

Former Marine Cpl. Kelly Miller of Eureka, Calif., survived because Dunham, the Medal of Honor recipient, fell on that grenade in 2004. In the years since, Miller, 24, part of Dunham’s patrol that day, has agonized endlessly over blame, guilt and whether he should have died rather than Dunham.

He became introverted and angry, said his mother, Linda Miller. “He went into the self-destructive mode,” she said.

Last September, after a night of drinking, he flipped his sports car. He suffered a broken arm, and his girlfriend, Kellyn Griffin, was severely injured. Felony charges are pending.

Deborah Dunham, mother of Jason Dunham, wrote a letter on Miller’s behalf to the court, explaining that “Kelly has been chasing his personal demons since Jason gave him the gift of a second chance of life.”

A similar struggle consumed Staff Sgt. Jeffery Gantt.

A member of the Virginia National Guard, Gantt was driving a Humvee on Oct. 26, 2005, when the gunner of the vehicle, Sgt. James “Ski” Witkowski, apparently tried to block a grenade from falling inside the vehicle and died in the blast.

“It’s almost like time stops. It’s like you’re outside of your body and you’re looking at what’s going on,” said Gantt, 37, of Fredericksburg, Va.

Gantt is on medical leave from his civilian job as a corrections officer and has been diagnosed with PTSD and a mild brain injury. Gantt fights the anger he feels for not having done enough — in his view — to keep Witkowski from sacrificing himself on the grenade.

“I remember one day I asked myself, ‘Why are you so mad? Why can’t you let this go?’ And I could feel my chest tighten and I was so” angry, Gantt said.

His girlfriend of six years, Sheila Ward, said that having his life spared has changed Gantt completely.

“I don’t know anything about him” anymore, she said.

The families of men who gave their lives also struggle with emotional crosscurrents.

Tom McGinnis felt a surge of different emotions over losing his only son: the overpowering grief, pride over the Medal of Honor nomination and wariness about the heroism hoopla. He knew Ross could have rolled out of the gunner’s turret and escaped the blast; he felt guilty for nearly wishing his son had done just that.

McGinnis also understood the potential for survivor’s guilt when he buried his son at Arlington National Cemetery early this year. After the ceremony, the elder McGinnis met Newland and two other soldiers saved by his son’s heroism, and he consoled them.

“I tried to emphasize to them that they can’t continue living thinking they’re indebted to Ross for what he did,” the father said. “They can’t go on for the rest of their lives thinking, ‘I’m here because of Ross.’ I wouldn’t think Ross would want them to feel that way.

“Things just happen.”

A NAPA auto parts employee from Shippenville, Pa., McGinnis said he would never want a book or a movie devoted to Ross. He does not want his son depicted as larger than life. The father said his son loved rebuilding car engines, worked at McDonald’s and had a gift for making people laugh. But he was an indifferent student and barely graduated from high school.

“He wasn’t exceptional. He was just like you and me,” Tom McGinnis said.

“He just made a split-second decision [to fall on the grenade]. He did what he thought was right. That doesn’t make him extraordinary. He just did an extraordinary thing.”

Gregg Zoroya writes for USA Today.
 
These original threads were a bit oldish to revive...
http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/22979.0/all.html
http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/67121.0.html
...so I though I'd start a new one with the latest twist - mods, feel free to merge/move if you see fit.

Lawmakers ask Obama to review Peralta case
Marine Corps Times, 23 Jan 09
Article link - Latest letter to President (.pdf)

Seven members of California’s congressional delegation have asked President Barack Obama to bestow the Medal of Honor to Sgt. Rafael Peralta, who died saving fellow Marines in Iraq.

In September, Peralta was posthumously awarded the Navy Cross for pulling a grenade under his body in Fallujah on Nov. 15, 2004. In a letter to Obama dated Friday, the bipartisan delegation — which includes Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, and Reps. Brian Bilbray, Bob Filner, Darrell Issa, Susan Davis and Duncan Hunter — said, “We feel there is now question, based on the facts of the case and the eye-witness testimony of those ... with him on the mission, that [Peralta] is deserving of the prestigious Medal of Honor.”

The delegation previously sent requests to former President George W. Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who ordered an independent review of Peralta’s mental faculties at the time of his actions. Navy Secretary Donald Winter supported Peralta’s nomination for the Medal of Honor, the nation’s highest award for valor, but Gates ultimately did not....

And what's the bolded part mean?  This, from another piece on the same story....
....Col. Eric Berg III, an Army pathologist who autopsied Peralta’s remains, said in a 2005 report that the head wound would have been “nearly instantly fatal. He could not have executed any meaningful motions.”  One officer familiar with the investigation said much of the research focused on whether the gunshot wound Peralta suffered damaged his brain enough to prevent him from making the decision to grab the grenade.  “Essentially, the issues come down to whether or not he consciously jumped on the grenade or whether he sort of fell onto it while dying,” the officer said. “There’s such a fine line between the Navy Cross and the Medal of Honor”....
 
Key to any nomination for the Medal of Honor are witness statements. The fewer the witnesses the harder it is to get approved.This is why initially the Navy SEALs that were ambushed in Afghanistan received the Navy Cross but the team commander Lt Murphy ended up getting the Medal of Honor.There was only 1 survivor's account to support the award.

I dont like politics invading the awards process and I think its unseemly. Nor do I like our awards process. During Vietnam a MG could approve locally awards up to a Silver Star. Now the recommendation goes to the pentagon. During Vietnam a DSC could be approved by the theater commander and was usually awarded within 6 months now its centralized in the Pentagon like everything else.

Another recent issue is why no living MOH's have been awarded during OIF/OEF.

Anyway I think the bottom line for some people are the perks.

[Each Medal of Honor recipient may have his or her name entered on the Medal of Honor Roll (38 U.S.C. § 1560).

Each person whose name is placed on the Medal of Honor Roll is certified to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as being entitled to receive the special pension of US$1,027 per month above and beyond any military pensions or other benefits for which they may be eligible. As of December 1, 2004, the pension is subject to cost-of-living increases.

Grave of a recipient at the Memphis National CemeteryEnlisted recipients of the Medal of Honor are entitled to a supplemental uniform allowance.

Recipients receive special entitlements to air transportation under the provisions of DOD Regulation 4515.13-R.

Special identification cards and commissary and exchange privileges are provided for Medal of Honor recipients and their eligible dependents.

Fully-qualified children of recipients are eligible for admission to the United States military academies without regard to the nomination and quota requirements.
Recipients receive a 10% increase in retired pay under 10 U.S.C. § 3991.

Those awarded the medal after October 23, 2002 also receive a Medal of Honor Flag. The law also specifies that all 103 living prior recipients also receive the flag.(14 U.S.C. § 505).

As with all medals, retired personnel may wear the Medal of Honor on "appropriate" civilian clothing. Regulations also specify that recipients of the Medal of Honor are allowed to wear the uniform "at their pleasure" with standard restrictions on political, commercial, or extremist purposes; other former members of the armed forces may do so only at certain ceremonial occasions.
 
A bump with the latest:
The Navy Department will reopen the valor case of Marine Corps Sgt. Rafael Peralta based on new evidence that reportedly removes any doubt about the infantryman’s actions during his waning moments of life seven years ago in Iraq.

The new evidence — two previously unseen videos and a recent study by a renowned forensic pathologist — was brought to the attention of the Navy Secretary Ray Mabus by Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., a former Marine officer and combat veteran who has lobbied for Peralta to receive the Medal of Honor, the nation’s highest combat valor award.
Related reading

Mabus wrote to Hunter on March 16, saying the evidence provided by the congressman will be reviewed by the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals. A spokeswoman for Mabus said the process would take “a matter of weeks.”

In his letter, Mabus writes that he shares Hunter’s commitment to ensuring Peralta, a Navy Cross recipient, receives the recognition he is due, and offers his assurance that the case “will be given thorough consideration by the Department of the Navy.”

When he died Nov. 15, 2004, Peralta was a member of 1st Battalion, 3rd Marines, out of Marine Corps Base Hawaii. He was killed during a house-clearing mission in Fallujah. Witnesses say that Peralta, who was already wounded by a gunshot wound to the head, pulled a live grenade under his body and absorbed the blast, saving the lives of fellow Marines.

The Marine Corps recommended that Peralta receive the Medal of Honor, but his actions were called into question by a separate review panel convened by former Defense Secretary Robert Gates. That board ultimately disapproved the Medal of Honor. The Navy Department then awarded him a Navy Cross, the nation’s second-highest combat valor award, but his family has refused to accept it.

The Gates panel concluded that in his condition Peralta could not have possessed the cognitive faculties to knowingly pull the grenade toward him, and further asserted that the device exploded near Peralta’s leg.

But the new study, by forensic pathologist Vincent Di Maio, concluded the head wound would not have precluded Peralta from pulling the grenade toward his body ....
US Marine Corps Times, 20 Mar 12
 
Back
Top