Camouflage: Kevlar Jock

[army]

Camouflage: Kevlar Jock





Posted by NDHQ spy from Canada on March 14, 1999 at 14:45:02:


In Reply to: Re: Kevlar Jock? posted by Rob Clarke on March 14, 1999 at 11:05:49:



Of course camouflage. While the statistics aren‘t in yet about the incidence of parading around in jock straps, I‘ll bet there are those who do indulge in a bit of ‘parading‘ who will sleep a little easier if their packages are well protected and hard to detect. Although for some this may have nothing to do with camouflage at all.
Yes - it must be camouflage, if only to reassure our NATO allies that our RD is still up to snuff, and that we are fully committed as an army to state of the art clothing and equipment. After all isn‘t that the message we‘re sending with the Combat Bra?

 

[army]

Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock





Posted by Rob Clarke from Orleans ON Canada on March 14, 1999 at 16:56:38:


In Reply to: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock posted by NDHQ spy on March 14, 1999 at 14:45:02:




Camouflage it is! I for one am fully satisfied that the Combat Bra and perhaps the Camojock will enable our armed forces to meet the challenges of the new century. I also sleep better at night secure in the knowledge that important issues such as these are given their rightful priority for RD funding.

Any guesses about what portion of the funds alloted to Clothe the Soldier program was spent on this Combat Bra?

I‘m sure that those serving in special operations ares without Gortex rain gear are happy to hear about this new item of clothing. What‘s next? Combat clothing for expectant female soldiers???

 

[army]

Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock





Posted by Jules Deschenes from Canada on March 15, 1999 at 18:02:49:


In Reply to: Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock posted by Rob Clarke on March 14, 1999 at 16:56:38:



Gees guys Kevlar chafes. It was invented by a woman. Why would you want to hide your attributes in cammo from the female of the species?

 

[army]

Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock





Posted by Rob Clarke from Canada on March 15, 1999 at 19:59:21:


In Reply to: Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock posted by Jules Deschenes on March 15, 1999 at 18:02:49:



Hello Jules! I can‘t think of an amusing reply to your question. Question: How do you think DND will label the new Combat Bra?

I submit: Bra, Combat, OD disrupted pattern, double barrelled, forward facing, slinged, troop for the use of, one size fits all.

Comments?

 

[army]

Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock





Posted by Jules Deschenes from Canada on March 17, 1999 at 20:38:40:


In Reply to: Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock posted by Rob Clarke on March 15, 1999 at 19:59:21:



Hi, Rob. What are they going to do re elevation and depression?

 

[army]

Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock





Posted by Rob Clarke from Canada on March 17, 1999 at 23:59:51:


In Reply to: Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock posted by Jules Deschenes on March 17, 1999 at 20:38:40:





Hmmmm! A good arguement for spandex, n‘est pas?

 

[army]

Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock





Posted by Rob Clarke from Canada on March 18, 1999 at 00:04:42:


In Reply to: Re: Camouflage: Kevlar Jock posted by Jules Deschenes on March 17, 1999 at 20:38:40:





Hmmmm! A good arguement for spandex, n‘est pas?