Not a terrible plan.
Not convinced he can convince the current government occupants south of us though.

So, the “what’s in it for America?” would be restoring a cross border supply chain with no trade barriers so that producers can search for the best deal on inputs and parts… But that’s explicitly what Trump has shrugged and walk away from, picking mercantilism instead. Why does Poilievre think he’ll succesfully convince the U.S. on what amounts to takebacksies?
Not a terrible plan.
Not convinced he can convince the current government occupants south of us though.
The most from what I can understand of it consists of 2 parts -
Not a terrible plan.
Not convinced he can convince the current government occupants south of us though.
What Trump completely and utterly fails to understand is that his solution would crush the Big 3 in Canada. Their sales would collapse here. For certain some here will continue to buy Ford 150 or GM Silverados but Toyota could easily expand their production here to produce Tacomas in Woodstock, along with Corollas and Camrys.So, the “what’s in it for America?” would be restoring a cross border supply chain with no trade barriers so that producers can search for the best deal on inputs and parts… But that’s explicitly what Trump has shrugged and walk away from, picking mercantilism instead. Why does Poilievre think he’ll succesfully convince the U.S. on what amounts to takebacksies?
Trump wants the manufacturing entirely in the U.S.. He’s been explicit on that, as has his trade rep. The trade rep has said we will have tariffs. I don’t understand how this is anything more than just wishful thinking by Poilievre.
Not a terrible plan.
Not convinced he can convince the current government occupants south of us though.
What Trump completely and utterly fails to understand is that his solution would crush the Big 3 in Canada. Their sales would collapse here. For certain some here will continue to buy Ford 150 or GM Silverados but Toyota could easily expand their production here to produce Tacomas in Woodstock, along with Corollas and Camrys.
Why would Canada not put a tariff on every car coming into Canada from the US if the Big 3 no longer produce cars here?
Canada is by far the Big 3’s largest export market and they could easily lose it, lose 500k car sales a year.
If the Big 3 remove their plants here, that loyalty will die, maybe slow, maybe fast, but a nice healthy 15-25% tariff on them coming into Canada will play a role.There is actually a documentary I watched on YouTube about how F Series trucks saved Ford in the Economic crash of 2008.
Pick ups dominate the NA Auto market. And those drivers can be very brand loyal.
Then add the increase in gas prices hitting us right now.If the Big 3 remove their plants here, that loyalty will die, maybe slow, maybe fast, but a nice healthy 15-25% tariff on them coming into Canada will play a role.
Very encouraging to see an alternate policy proposed, rather than simply nay-saying the current policy. This allows consideration on merits, rather than continuing to consider everything on origin - ie who proposed the policy.
Not a terrible plan.
Not convinced he can convince the current government occupants south of us though.
The ambassador also expressed disappointment with Carney’s approach to Arctic security, saying Carney’s recent announcement of C$32 billion ($23 billion) of investment in the region — followed by a trip to Norway for security talks with Nordic nations — was made in a way that seemed to sideline the US.
“We don’t play a role in that?” Hoekstra asked. “We think the most effective place to defend Canada and the US is to do it together — but if Canada wants to go another direction, they’re free to do that.”