• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

She is staying what's well known - successive generations of "leadership" in DND/CAF failed to maintain the underlying infrastructure of the system. That includes buildings, processes and functions needed to ensure readiness, because it's always sexier to chase the new than to maintain what's already there.

National Post stirring the pot. She literally said the new spending was fantastic. They buried that several paras in.

Yes, it's great.

No, it's not enough.

But also, we don't have the ability to spend more in the short term anyway. So....
 
Doing unsexy maintenance work on infrastructure doesn't get you re-elected.

It can. If needs must and you are the one stuck with fixing the problem.

....

The pipe most recently ruptured in December, flooding streets in the northwest and triggering Stage 4 water restrictions citywide. The break occurred a few days before an independent review panel released its report on the water main, which painted a damning picture of how the city governed and managed its water utility assets over the past 20 years.

The 86-page report detailed what its author, retired ATCO executive Siegfried Kiefer, called “systemic gaps” in Calgary’s water utility management throughout the past two decades.

“The panel has traced these gaps to external pressures, risk asset integrity processes, ineffective management and a lack of effective governance oversight,” the report read.

“The city’s water utility processes were not sufficiently robust to manage a complex system of this nature, especially with challenging external pressures.”

.....


.....

Repair the water mains or save the planet? Where best to spend taxes?
 
It can. If needs must and you are the one stuck with fixing the problem.

....

The pipe most recently ruptured in December, flooding streets in the northwest and triggering Stage 4 water restrictions citywide. The break occurred a few days before an independent review panel released its report on the water main, which painted a damning picture of how the city governed and managed its water utility assets over the past 20 years.

The 86-page report detailed what its author, retired ATCO executive Siegfried Kiefer, called “systemic gaps” in Calgary’s water utility management throughout the past two decades.

“The panel has traced these gaps to external pressures, risk asset integrity processes, ineffective management and a lack of effective governance oversight,” the report read.

“The city’s water utility processes were not sufficiently robust to manage a complex system of this nature, especially with challenging external pressures.”

.....


.....

Repair the water mains or save the planet? Where best to spend taxes?
My point was that someone often needs to do the unsexy, because the people who should have done it years ago spent the time/money on shiny things to get elected/be popular.

Whether it's not repairing water mains, or buying new toys to distract from the crumbling and unmaintained ones we already have. The tendency is to buy new things rather than fix the old stuff we bought years ago.
 
My point was that someone often needs to do the unsexy, because the people who should have done it years ago spent the time/money on shiny things to get elected/be popular.

Whether it's not repairing water mains, or buying new toys to distract from the crumbling and unmaintained ones we already have. The tendency is to buy new things rather than fix the old stuff we bought years ago.
And, on top of that, the new sexy things being bought are often of less quality and of less overall longevity that the issues tend to come more often and more severe as time goes on.
 
My point was that someone often needs to do the unsexy, because the people who should have done it years ago spent the time/money on shiny things to get elected/be popular.

Whether it's not repairing water mains, or buying new toys to distract from the crumbling and unmaintained ones we already have. The tendency is to buy new things rather than fix the old stuff we bought years ago.

Absolutely.
 
Governments fail to focus on essentials. Film at 11.

Bad news is that "starve the beast" conservativism appears to have failed; "add programs until we have to raise taxes" progressivism has won.
 
Governments fail to focus on essentials. Film at 11.

Bad news is that "starve the beast" conservativism appears to have failed; "add programs until we have to raise taxes" progressivism has won.

I take comfort in all those layer cake ancient cities buried under desert sands. Eventually renewal happens.
 
I was discussing this with one my municipal councillors, last week.

I am a bit tired of bike lanes and speed bump announcements. Could we please focus on replacing sewer lines?
I get the distinct impression that about 5 HRM councilors only got elected to deliver bike lanes in an eighteenth Century City.
 
I was discussing this with one my municipal councillors, last week.

I am a bit tired of bike lanes and speed bump announcements. Could we please focus on replacing sewer lines?

It's called the Suburban Growth ponzi scheme. Suburban growth almost never pays enough in taxes to fund full replacement cost over the lifetime of said infrastructure. So cities respond by sprawling further to get those sweet development charges that can keep the ponzi going.



No politician is ever going to change this. Why would they? If that councillor ran on a platform that said "I will not expand a thing, but instead will raise taxes to make sure infrastructure is at 100% serviceability", most of your neighbours (and maybe even you) would call him all kinds of nasty names, label him fiscally irresponsible and tar and feather him out of office. Most people want the lie. And will vote for it.

This isn't just a local phenomenon. Happens at every level. It's why we have huge federal and provincial deficits too.

Hell, there's evidence it's generational too. There's evidence that Boomers largely voted for fiscal conservatism when it benefited them as a cohort (didn't want higher taxes during peak working years) and have now rejected austerity because they want all that healthcare spending and social supports.
 
Back
Top