• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

If you are cycling your trucks on 10 yrs are you even looking at the engine? I turned my trucks over on 10 yrs stretching to 15 when times were tougher and can only remember working on one truck engine. This was before DEF though
I'm the same way. I'm not one of those new car each year types and plan on my cars for ten years at which point they are still useable - then again I'm not an 18-year-old gunner slamming around the ranges anymore.

What I meant is that if you design a vehicle line to run ten or twenty years then 200 vehicles built in 2026 might have a different engine and related parts than the same truck coming off the line in 2033 because that original 2026 engine isn't being built anymore. You'll have the same chassis but it will have to compensate for engine mounts, a transmission and drive train connection that might be different.

It's not insurmountable but it can lead to a spare parts issue downstream for the older vehicles.

Notwithstanding that, I think that is the only way to go for our vehicle fleets. We need long run, low rate production lines that stay open indefinitely, if necessary as crown corporations or arsenals.

🍻
 
Seems like Ukraine is going to get into the international hybrid game seriously..


....


Same general vicinity as this one the Ukraine claimed in December


.....

Does Canada need its own "little green men"?
 



Germany’s parliamentary budget committee has approved 11 major defense procurement projects worth more than €2.5 billion ($3 billion), bringing the country’s tally on equipment spending for 2025 to over €33 billion across 73 major projects.

More....faster.
 
This could have gone into the GBAD file but Golden Dome, IAMD seems to be likely to be a bigger issue in the overall defence plan.


“We have the most exquisite capabilities on the planet, with a high probability of kill. They do not miss but they take forever to build. They’re exceptionally expensive, and as a result, I have very small magazine depths, because the cost per kill is so high,” said Guetlein. “I have to flip that equation.”

The “cost per kill” has to come down, said Guetlein.

Current U.S. missile defense interceptors, which were designed for regional or limited homeland defense missions, cost millions of dollars apiece and are used to defeat much lower-cost weapons. Analysts have pointed out that this imbalance invites adversaries to overwhelm defenses through volume.
 
Germany’s parliamentary budget committee has approved 11 major defense procurement projects worth more than €2.5 billion ($3 billion), bringing the country’s tally on equipment spending for 2025 to over €33 billion across 73 major projects.

More....faster.
It's nice when your navy expenditures can be modest.

:giggle:
 
Overall German defense shopping list - 438 Billion US Dollars

The IRIS-T and Skyranger purchases interest me. Typhon is also quite interesting. To the best of my knowledge the US is only planning on five of those for the presence - one per MDTF. - ground launched Tomahawks?

🍻
 
The IRIS-T and Skyranger purchases interest me. Typhon is also quite interesting. To the best of my knowledge the US is only planning on five of those for the presence - one per MDTF. - ground launched Tomahawks?

🍻

Apparently 400 Vbs JMEWs (Joint Mult Effect Weapon for fixed structures and fortifications at 2000 km)
If they got the Vas MST then they could take out ships at similar ranges. That would go a long way to closing off the Baltic to surface traffic all on its own.

The JMEWS would reduce the IDS load on the Air Force as well.

PS Dresden to Nizhny Novgorod, overflying Moscow, is 2000 km.
 
Apparently 400 Vbs JMEWs (Joint Mult Effect Weapon for fixed structures and fortifications at 2000 km)
If they got the Vas MST then they could take out ships at similar ranges. That would go a long way to closing off the Baltic to surface traffic all on its own.

The JMEWS would reduce the IDS load on the Air Force as well.

PS Dresden to Nizhny Novgorod, overflying Moscow, is 2000 km.
I've been pondering an issue. Typhon has a 4-cell Mk 41 VLS which has been tested with the SM-6 as well as Tomahawk. SM-6 is dual purpose - surface to surface and surface to air including terminal ballistic missile. The SM-3 works with the Mk 41 as well but to the best of my knowledge hasn't been tested with Typhon. SM-3's got more range but need a good system behind it like Aegis.

🍻
 
I'm the same way. I'm not one of those new car each year types and plan on my cars for ten years at which point they are still useable - then again I'm not an 18-year-old gunner slamming around the ranges anymore.

What I meant is that if you design a vehicle line to run ten or twenty years then 200 vehicles built in 2026 might have a different engine and related parts than the same truck coming off the line in 2033 because that original 2026 engine isn't being built anymore. You'll have the same chassis but it will have to compensate for engine mounts, a transmission and drive train connection that might be different.

It's not insurmountable but it can lead to a spare parts issue downstream for the older vehicles.

Notwithstanding that, I think that is the only way to go for our vehicle fleets. We need long run, low rate production lines that stay open indefinitely, if necessary as crown corporations or arsenals.

🍻
you can minimize the disruptions by by buying the equipment in lots by type. In this case your light, medium, and heavy fleets. I never found that the trucks were that different. The new stuff is mostly cosmetics. Although its possible we are on the verge of bigger things powertrain wise
 
Back
Top