• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

The whole point of picking GM Defense is to have a standard product that has parts compatibility with the civilian vehicles driven all over the country.

I agree with the concept but the Senator is built on top of a civilian vehicle as well, either the Ford F550 or the Dodge Ram 5500. Given that the Ford is made here in Canada and he Ram is made in Mexico I thought it might be a better fit.

And further, if the Senator can be built on top of either the Dodge or Ford product then why not a GM product as well, a Silverado 5500 for example.

We don't need every town making trucks, and we don't need the entire automotive production capacity of the nation dedicated to making army trucks. We just need enough production of each type to keep a small line running.

I agree. I was pointing out that we would be spoiled for choice to have vehicles of this class assembled in Canada without having to have GM set up a line. Given their lines are scaled to produce hundreds of thousands to millions and our requirements are in the thousands I thought we might be looking at a scaling problem there. There are lots of potential competitors to Roshel. We don't need them all. Just a couple, or maybe a handful.

Or just one.

The ISV is 80% standard Colorado ZR2, and Im sure the larger version shares lots of components with the Silverado. Thats the whole point of those GM Defense offerings. I specified GM Defense because we already use their product, and they offer more that we can make future use of. They were also the first NA manufacturer to get serious about getting back into the Defense game.

Seen.

But it won't put Oshawa back to work.

As for small drones, sure spread the love around, have different manufactures for the parts all over the country. There is a lot less complexity in having small shops make small drones than there is in having 30 different shops making your trucks.

As I noted, wrt to the 30 shops, I was misunderstood.

Wrt the drones. We are still in the 1910 to 1940s era of flight when pianomakers were offering novel means of solving problems. Encouraging people to keep offering solutions and allowing service people to play with the offerings seems to work for the Ukrainians as it did for the world in the first half of the 20th Century. When we don't have all the answers then we should be encouraging every answer.
 
A somebody has to remember 25,000 phones numbers.

I regularly get Charlie Charlies over my phone. Weather alerts. Amber alerts. And individuals don't seem to have trouble reaching me nor I them. I have even been involved in group chats that never seem to end.
 
You don't just buy cell phones and call it a comms plan. 25,000 cell phones bought in Canada could be useless in parts of the world.

I can appreciate that but for a domestic security force, one that is designed to take the load off the Army proper, what level of comms would be appropriate?

25,000 personal comms devices, insecure or not, would solve a lot of comms problems in times of emergency. Having said that. I doubt if there are many Canadians that cannot be reached by cell phone these days.
 
Back
Top