• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada Post Woes (merged)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pea
  • Start date Start date
Problem with Skytrain and Translink in general is they are really working on a now obsolete model. Skytrain works really well to move large volumes of people to certain hub points. The problem is those hub points being downtown and now UBC are actually seeing declines in usage and WFH and technology is going to continue to be disruptive of their transit modelling.

Roadways are multi-use with commercial, private, work, recreational usage, along with being infrastructure corridors. Skytrain is a one trick pony and can't easily be shifted as population behaviours shift. Buses are more labour intensive, but can be easily shifted to meet demand or cut to meet budget restraints. I personal question how much thought they have put into long term usage of the new lines they are building. I support the one going out into the valley, but not the UBC one. I also don't support increasing taxes on drivers to pay for it. I am already going to have to pay $700+ extra for the Metro Van boondoggle of a treatment plant.
The major problem with something other than rail is that the vehicles are mixed with cars, trucks, motorcycles etc. A transit dedicated lane solves this but the space required means that special construction is now called for and you are back to the Skytrain problem. Surface rail such as streetcars work without the high cost of either tunneling (subways) or vertical construction (Skytrain) but they take up very expensive land. To my mind the best solution is to spread your growth throughout the region or province and have smaller cities where buses can be beneficial and bicycles become practical for the health conscious group.
 
The major problem with something other than rail is that the vehicles are mixed with cars, trucks, motorcycles etc. A transit dedicated lane solves this but the space required means that special construction is now called for and you are back to the Skytrain problem. Surface rail such as streetcars work without the high cost of either tunneling (subways) or vertical construction (Skytrain) but they take up very expensive land. To my mind the best solution is to spread your growth throughout the region or province and have smaller cities where buses can be beneficial and bicycles become practical for the health conscious group.
Problem with dedicated bus lanes is the efficiency of that patch of asphalts drops, when you start to calculate usage over the whole day. Bus lanes that are only bus lanes during peak hours.

No planner today gets to go through school, gets a degree or a master by promoting the use of privately owned cars. You must be in the Public Transit Religion to get a job, so there is much "Group-think" in that field.
 
Except for the major arteries which are purpose-built and have limited numbers of "intersections" (eg. highways), the existing road network is full of potential bus-only lanes. There are some neighbourhoods, typically a block removed from a main street (thus within easy walking distance), in which residents might be happier to just have bus-only traffic instead of rat-runners.
 
Coincidentally, an open letter penned by a postie... aka 'keeping our neighborhoods safe' ;)

Labour costs, however, remained flat, as letter carrier wages were frozen since 2018, with no movement in the pay bracket except for two $1/hour increases during the pandemic. The pay bracket was $20 to $28 per hour, and letter carriers would move up the pay bracket once they passed their 400 hour probationary period, at a rate of $1 per hour per year. Once reaching the eighth year post-probation, their wage is capped, with no more increases, for the length of their career, unless a new contract is agreed to by CUPW and Canada Post. At the time of the strike, letter carriers earned between $22 and $30 per hour.

The current probationary period of 400 hours takes about 18 months to accumulate. The turnover rate for new staff is dismally high, with up to 80% quitting or being dismissed before reaching 400 cumulative hours. These new carriers would never have qualified for benefits or pay increases before leaving Canada Post.

Management intends to raise the probationary period to 1000 hours, which could take 3 to 4 years, which means constant recruitment, training, and more carriers earning the bottom of the pay scale, with no benefits.
For labour costs with cost of living I can see a point. yeah starting off at $22 seems high compared to many but based on a 20 day work month that is only $3300 a month.

Not getting the math of 400 hours taking 18 months or 1000 taking 3 to 4 years. Did I miss something or did the writer leave something out? Putting in 7.5 hours a day it would take approx 53 days and 133 days which would be in the 3 to 6 month range. In the 80s I worked at job that had a 3 month probationary period so don't see that as an issue.
 
For labour costs with cost of living I can see a point. yeah starting off at $22 seems high compared to many but based on a 20 day work month that is only $3300 a month.

Not getting the math of 400 hours taking 18 months or 1000 taking 3 to 4 years. Did I miss something or did the writer leave something out? Putting in 7.5 hours a day it would take approx 53 days and 133 days which would be in the 3 to 6 month range. In the 80s I worked at job that had a 3 month probationary period so don't see that as an issue.

And what would it cost to contract out through (clutching pearls!) an organization like Amazon, at least for part of it, just as a comparison ;)
 
And what would it cost to contract out through (clutching pearls!) an organization like Amazon, at least for part of it, just as a comparison ;)
If Amazon around here (SE Alberta) is any indication of their service outside of major centres, it will be sub contracted out. They still do a good job, but it is not Amazon. No shiny trucks (rusty Dogde minivan), no 1 day delivery guarantee (2 days instead).
And we know how increasing layers of admin, coordination and workers always improves service and working conditions. Canada Post may have its problems, but it is still cheaper than a courier for outgoing packages in my situation. Also I can walk to a full service post office rather than drive to an industrial park 10km away.
 
And what would it cost to contract out through (clutching pearls!) an organization like Amazon, at least for part of it, just as a comparison ;)
That is a good question but you also need to take into account and compare the service offered. If CP is giving one day home delivery then amazon offering 2 day delivery for a dollar less doesn't cut it.
 
Letter from Redcliff to Calgary, 4 day delivery
Fedex: $27
Purolater: $73
Canpar: $51
Canada Post: $1.24

Excited Well Done GIF
 
You are presenting a logical fallacy, go ahead research which one, you might learn something.

I'm not comparing email services.
I'm comparing services that deliver small physical things.
 
You are presenting a logical fallacy, go ahead research which one, you might learn something.
Why? My point is to remind that other tech is in the mix. CP is in trouble because people are using other means to replace snail mail communications, and have been since roughly the invention of the telegraph. Fold up CP and let millions of people - including people in remote communities - figure out how to deal with the loss of inexpensive physical mail delivery themselves. Don't even attempt to have a very few thinking heads in government impose a solution; they can't possibly conceive as many practical solutions.
 
The problem with these Crown Corps is there is very little accountability for anyone involved: Management or the Union.

Look at the letter D&B posted that was penned by a front-line employee:

The management team that took over in 2018 came largely from the private sector, working for companies such as Coca-Cola, and are largely unfamiliar and unaware of the extent of the role we provide. Decisions that are made are done so with no input from employees, and are not in the best interest of Canada Post, its employees or Canadians we serve. The management team felt they had a mandate to modernize Canada Post, with new electric vehicles, a new $400 million plant in the Toronto area, and carbon credits to make Canada Post appear to be climate-friendly, from a marketing perspective. This excessive spending of up to $1 billion per year before improving the revenue stream by diversifying our revenue sources, focus on sales opportunities, and increasing pricing to keep pace with inflation, led to the losses which have been widely publicized.

All sides think the Feds will just keep the gravy train going indefinitely. Fire the executive for being wildly incompetent and bring in some new brainpower to get this machine back on the rails.
 
CP's toast without a radical change in operations... I wonder if they'e considered 'every second day' delivery? Mon-wed-fri on week one, tue-thu on week 2?
I have no idea why that's not on the bargaining table. I understand the Union would be pissed as dues would fall without new hires, but I'm pretty sure the average mail worker would be quite happy with that concession.
 
CP's toast without a radical change in operations... I wonder if they'e considered 'every second day' delivery? Mon-wed-fri on week one, tue-thu on week 2?
And a return, in dense urban areas, to implementing community mailboxes instead of home delivery. I'm in an area where implementation was stopped part way through - so my street gets to your door delivery, and one street over (and points east of there) have community mailboxes.
 
For labour costs with cost of living I can see a point. yeah starting off at $22 seems high compared to many but based on a 20 day work month that is only $3300 a month.

Not getting the math of 400 hours taking 18 months or 1000 taking 3 to 4 years. Did I miss something or did the writer leave something out? Putting in 7.5 hours a day it would take approx 53 days and 133 days which would be in the 3 to 6 month range. In the 80s I worked at job that had a 3 month probationary period so don't see that as an issue.
?
CP's toast without a radical change in operations... I wonder if they'e considered 'every second day' delivery? Mon-wed-fri on week one, tue-thu on week 2?
reduce your home delivery force by half. Each carrier has two walks. Good deal and it probably has been proposed since it does make sense. The biggest problem is overtime. They are paid for a full shift daily yet most are finished within 4 hours. A long walk is 5. So they are only working 20 hours a week. However they get double and a half for weekend call-in which is why they don't want part timers at all and naturally they baulk at taking either a reduction in OT rate or clocking in and being paid straight time for weekends until they reach 40 or 37 hours or whatever their week is. . Canada Post wants to compete with Fedex etc. and to do so they need to be able to deliver on weekends but they can't afford to at overtime rates
 
Back
Top