- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 360
This reminds me of a case from a few years ago of an Indian young man in his 20s who didn't realize he wasn't a Canadian citizen until he applied for a passport. His parents were Indian diplomats but they wrongly assumed that being born here meant that he was Canadian; they obviously didn't know or forgot that diplomatic immunity precluded their son from being given citizenship at birth.
Yahoo News
Yahoo News
Harper government considers tightening ‘citizenship by birth’ rules
By Andy Radia | Canada Politics
Canada and the United States are the only two western countries that still automatically grant citizenship to anyone born on their soil. That means if non-citizens or non-residents have a baby in Canada, the baby becomes a citizen and can, as an adult, sponsor his or her parent for immigration.
According to a 'secret' 2013 document presented to then-immigration minister Jason Kenney — put together by various federal departments — the Harper government is being urged to eliminate that birthright.
The 17-page document was obtained by the Toronto Star via an access to information request.
One of the main concerns is that automatically giving citizenship to those born in Canada can lead to fraud.
In 2013, the National Post reported on a Canada Border Services Agency document which suggested that a number of pregnant Nigerian women made their way to Canada in a "pattern... reminiscent of an attempt to exploit birthright laws."
The Post called it "birth tourism."
(...EDITED)
Some worry that the policy is too harsh and could, at some point, deem certain individuals born in Canada stateless.
"This proposal is in line with the government's ideological approach to immigration rather than any evidence-based solutions," immigration attorney Michael Niren told Yahoo Canada News.
"The government wants to block as many roads to Canadian citizenship as it can. Contrary to the trend of globalization, we are taking a more isolationist stance when it comes to immigration and citizenship. This is the opposite approach of what Canada needs, given it's aging demographic.
(...EDITED)
Andrew Griffith, formerly a director general for citizenship and multiculturalism at Citizenship and Immigration Canada, says that the small number of children born to foreign nationals doesn't necessarily justify the cost to annul the law.
"There is no evidence that this is a major problem," Andrew Griffith, formerly a director general for citizenship and multiculturalism at Citizenship and Immigration Canada, told Yahoo in an email exchange.
"Possibly 500 cases out of annual births of some 360,000."
(...EDITED)