OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 20,550
- Points
- 1,260
Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread
- Thread starter jmt18325
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 16,148
- Points
- 1,160
Trolling the US
- Reaction score
- 21,866
- Points
- 1,010
That is gold…
- Reaction score
- 3,641
- Points
- 1,190
Can you imagine?
- Reaction score
- 16,148
- Points
- 1,160
Irving CEO is likely jacking off in the in the executive bathroom to the thought of landing a
- Reaction score
- 21,866
- Points
- 1,010
Trade them RCDs for F35s?
- Reaction score
- 3,641
- Points
- 1,190
Nah just the idea of the US replacing the Constellation class with River Class, and part of that agreement being US yards build a couple of ours for us.
Oldgateboatdriver
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 4,010
- Points
- 1,010
It's highly knowledgeable people like Pete Hegseth and his ilks making the "MAGA" calls now: They'll go for the "super-duper" DDX destroyer/cruiser/battleship. Never mind that half of them will quickly get sunk by submarines in a shooting war because there aren't any "little escorts" around them to carry out ASW.
And, BTW, they couldn't go for the RCD as a replacement of the Constellation class any more than they could do it successfully with the Italian FREMM: They would have to Americanize it to death to accommodate their manning system, i.e. modify it to manage to stick 300+ humans in that hull originally developed for 200. It would cause the same chaos it did with the Italian design.
IMHO, the biggest mistake they made in their choice for the Constellation class was not picking an American design to start with - one that met all their DC requirements already and could be easily amenable to their accommodation standards: The Ingalls designed one based on the very successful USCG Legend class cutter.
And, BTW, they couldn't go for the RCD as a replacement of the Constellation class any more than they could do it successfully with the Italian FREMM: They would have to Americanize it to death to accommodate their manning system, i.e. modify it to manage to stick 300+ humans in that hull originally developed for 200. It would cause the same chaos it did with the Italian design.
IMHO, the biggest mistake they made in their choice for the Constellation class was not picking an American design to start with - one that met all their DC requirements already and could be easily amenable to their accommodation standards: The Ingalls designed one based on the very successful USCG Legend class cutter.
