• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Consideration for the Victoria Cross - Afghanistan

Someone DID ask the question of the former CDS now calling for a review of AFG awards ....
Archived here.

From the article:
... Hillier, who chaired the committee that awarded Larochelle his Star of Military Valour, said details of his story that came to light in the years since make his case worth a fresh look.

"I don't think we made a mistake, but having done something doesn't mean that it's cast in stone forever and ever," he said.

Hillier said new details about "how badly injured" Larochelle was during the battle, and the fact that he volunteered to take the position, should merit a reappraisal of his case ...
THIS I'd forgotten about:
... Gen. Walter Natynczyk, chief of the defence staff from 2008 to 2012, ordered a review in 2012 of the 20 Stars of Military Valour awarded for the Afghanistan conflict ...
Let's see what happens next ...
 
Last edited:
Bumped with this I just spotted via LinkedIn.
LinkedIn article also archived here.

Short & sweet: maybe it's time to review ALL pre-1993 (when Cdn VC "began") high-end awards to see which might warrant a VC now.* A couple of citations noted in the article are 2 x Stars of Courage awarded for Cyprus actions in 1974.

* - According to CP (archived here), "Gen. Walter Natynczyk, chief of the defence staff from 2008 to 2012, ordered a review in 2012 of the 20 Stars of Military Valour awarded for the Afghanistan conflict."
 
I can.

"We revisited these files and found we did nothing wrong" is a recurring theme with this government.
Most of the decisions that will be relitigated happened under the Harper government.

If you think that won't play into the decision space - an opportunity for the LPC to condemn the CPC for not caring about the CAF...
 
Most of the decisions that will be relitigated happened under the Harper government.

If you think that won't play into the decision space - an opportunity for the LPC to condemn the CPC for not caring about the CAF...
I need some education here. What role does the political stripe of the government play in this? My understanding is that these awards are determined by the CF Decorations and Commendations Advisory Committee (made up of one member selected by the Governor General and five selected by the CDS) and signed off by the Governor General or CDS as appropriate. At best one can argue that the GG and CDS are political appointments.

It's the bureaucracy of awarding honours that is the problem and not the politics.

The only link to the Harper government is that the bulk of this war and the acts of heroism related to it occurred under Harper's tenure from 2006 to 2015.

🍻
 
I need some education here. What role does the political stripe of the government play in this? My understanding is that these awards are determined by the CF Decorations and Commendations Advisory Committee (made up of one member selected by the Governor General and five selected by the CDS) and signed off by the Governor General or CDS as appropriate. At best one can argue that the GG and CDS are political appointments.

It's the bureaucracy of awarding honours that is the problem and not the politics.

The only link to the Harper government is that the bulk of this war and the acts of heroism related to it occurred under Harper's tenure from 2006 to 2015.

🍻

Which GoC reopened the file? Which one will claim credit and shift blame?

You are applying a logical, rational framework. Not a political one.

And if the parties were flipped, behaviour would be the same. Lizards gonna lizard, after all.

 
I need some education here. What role does the political stripe of the government play in this? My understanding is that these awards are determined by the CF Decorations and Commendations Advisory Committee (made up of one member selected by the Governor General and five selected by the CDS) and signed off by the Governor General or CDS as appropriate. At best one can argue that the GG and CDS are political appointments.

It's the bureaucracy of awarding honours that is the problem and not the politics.

The only link to the Harper government is that the bulk of this war and the acts of heroism related to it occurred under Harper's tenure from 2006 to 2015.

🍻
I've never met a Canadian government of any political stripe yet that wouldn't use any military function as a political event.
With the possible exception of Remembrance Day . And that's only due I suspect to personal self preservation . Getting lynched by a mob defeats the purpose of getting elected.
You have to be alive to enjoy it.
 
Which GoC reopened the file? Which one will claim credit and shift blame?
I see your point but this is the same government which since 2017 has ignored and rejected all attempts to reopen the issue. Yup. I see where someone might claim Brownie points but they'll be called out for being hypocritical if they try to lay blame. If they want to take credit without shifting blame then, okay, and more power to them for finally doing the right thing.

🍻
 
I see your point but this is the same government which since 2017 has ignored and rejected all attempts to reopen the issue. Yup. I see where someone might claim Brownie points but they'll be called out for being hypocritical if they try to lay blame. If they want to take credit without shifting blame then, okay, and more power to them for finally doing the right thing.

🍻
Once again I admire your attempt to apply a rational and logical framework to a political discussion.
 
Most of the decisions that will be relitigated happened under the Harper government.

If you think that won't play into the decision space - an opportunity for the LPC to condemn the CPC for not caring about the CAF...
When the CDS the senior NCO on the review committee headed by a former CDS said in 2012, “After the review, we found that two were a little bit weak, but were still deserving and two were very, very strong. And that’s all that happened,” it was Team Blue at the helm, so there's room for that, for sure.

OP edit w/correction in yellow
 
Last edited:
The faux outrage would be more convincing if they'd thought to add a few exclamation marks ;)


Conservatives Expect Action For Our Veterans and Military Heroes​


Ottawa, ON – Blake Richards, Conservative Shadow Minister for Veterans Affairs released the following statement regarding the establishment of a Military Honours and Review Board:

“Conservatives have long called for such a review board to be created and for Canada’s heroes to be properly recognized. Under former Leader Erin O’Toole, Conservatives advanced a motion calling on the government to create an honours and review board with the express purpose of re-examining cases such as Pte Jess Larochelle to award a Canadian hero with the Canadian Victoria Cross.

“Unfortunately, that initial motion was defeated in the House, but now after years of tireless advocating by veterans such as Bruce Moncur and his organization ‘Valour in the Presence of the Enemy’ this issue has gained support once again.

“Conservatives express a cautious optimism over these announcements. They are a step in the right direction, but action needs to be taken, and details need to be provided to Canadian veterans. Conservatives will watch for these details very closely to ensure that action backs up the words spoken today.

“Conservatives in the Standing Committee for Veterans Affairs passed a motion to have the committee express its support for this initiative. I plan to bring this up in the House this coming week and I look forward to hearing more from the Liberal Government on this matter.

“Conservatives are proud to have stood alongside veterans in support of this initiative since the beginning. This effort was included in the Conservative national platform in the last election and Conservative members remain committed to holding the Government to account to see this through to the end.”


 
Hmmm....the Conservatives were in power during the Afghanistan War and denied the VC nomination, and now they're calling for a review board. :rolleyes:
 
Hmmm....the Conservatives were in power during the Afghanistan War and denied the VC nomination, and now they're calling for a review board. :rolleyes:
According to some accounts, in at least the Larochelle incident, new information came up after the submission for SV went in.

The senior NCO on the review committee headed by a former CDS is quoted saying in 2012 after a review of the Larochelle file and others: “After the review, we found that two were a little bit weak, but were still deserving and two were very, very strong. And that’s all that happened." That was 5 years after the SV was awarded to Larochelle, which (and I stand to be corrected, as always) would allow time for this late-breaking information to be shared with the review committee. So, either 1) with the new information mentioned, or 2) if the new info wasn't considered, that suggests to me that the government of the day wasn't keen on giving out VCs.
 
Last edited:
I don't think this Liberal government (or the previous one, which had the time and ability to address this issue) wants Canada to have any heroes that aren't activists or entertainers. A "real war hero" doesn't fit the narrative of the peaceable nation.

I would love to be proven wrong.
 
Back
Top