• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Continental Defence Corvette

View attachment 98412


"Construction is scheduled to begin at Conrad Shipyard in Louisiana in March 2026, with the first vessel expected to be delivered later that year under a Navy program of record. After delivery of the first ship, Blue Water plans to ramp up production to between 10 and 20 vessels per year."

"Boston-based shipbuilding startup Blue Water Autonomy has unveiled the Liberty Class, a 190-foot autonomous surface vessel designed for rapid, repeatable construction as the U.S. Navy looks for ways to grow fleet capacity while its traditional shipbuilding programs remain under pressure."

"The vessel is designed to sail more than 10,000 nautical miles, carry over 150 metric tons of payload, and support a wide range of mission packages, including sensors, logistics systems, and weapons."


"The ship is based on Damen’s Stan Patrol 6009 hull, which features the company’s distinctive Axe Bow—a vertical bow intended to improve seakeeping by cutting through waves rather than slamming into them. More than 300 Axe Bow vessels are already operating worldwide, allowing Blue Water to focus its engineering effort on autonomy rather than hull development."

"What sets the Liberty Class apart isn’t just the mission set, but how it was developed. The vessel was designed entirely with private capital, a rare approach for a full-sized Navy ship, but one the company says allowed it to move faster and avoid the long development timelines that have become common in major federal programs."


10 to 20 hulls a year

4x Mk70 PDS with four cells each
160 to 320 new cells per year added to the fleet.
Arleigh Burkes have 90 cells

And the US can't build three of them a year.


Even the Legends take 3 to 4 years.


On the other hand these tagalongs may make up for deficiecies in the Legends and the LCSs.
From the article on Topshee's Town Hall meeting:
“We need to know everything that’s happening on and under our waters and have the final say over who comes into our waters,” Topshee told The Chronicle Herald in a lengthy sit-down interview.
Article content
“Who can stay in our waters? Who can do what in our waters? We’re building a navy that can do that.”
To me the expedient solution is a mass of autonomous sensor nodes to detect contacts so that our existing platforms can respond to them. There are a number of existing UUV's and USV's available that we could use as a stop gap measure while the CDC's are designed and built.

We have the AOPS (and Coast Guard) that can act as mother ships for these platforms. This should be the short term focus to my mind.
 

The Brits are cancelling a research project. Will they go slower and abandon the USV route? Or, more likely, go faster and put the money towards real and present capabilities?
 
I'm often curious about what happens when a high-functioning, fully autonomous warship needs tech support? Does it have a 'limp home' mode like my truck?
 
Corvettes you say?



274 tonnes full load
Up to 60 knots in calm seas
Up to 25 knots in SS5
1500 km at 40 knots

8x NSM
1x 76mm

15 or 16 crew

In service since 1999 (13 to 27 years old)
If we needed armed boats in the inside passage between Vancouver Island and the mainland, or on the Great Lakes, those might make some sense. As it stands, we don't need armed boats in those areas, and those would be pretty useless in the North Atlantic or North Pacific.

We need ocean going corvettes, not boats made to skip in and out of fjords for coastal defense.
 
If we needed armed boats in the inside passage between Vancouver Island and the mainland, or on the Great Lakes, those might make some sense. As it stands, we don't need armed boats in those areas, and those would be pretty useless in the North Atlantic or North Pacific.

We need ocean going corvettes, not boats made to skip in and out of fjords for coastal defense.
They have two things going for them . One they go really, really fast, they look absolutely bad ass just standing still.
As recruiting tool for young people what's not to love .
Besides Coastal Forces tend to attract young people with a slightly feral and buccaneering sort of attitude. Navies need a slight strain of that .
 
They have two things going for them . One they go really, really fast, they look absolutely bad ass just standing still.
As recruiting tool for young people what's not to love .
Besides Coastal Forces tend to attract young people with a slightly feral and buccaneering sort of attitude. Navies need a slight strain of that .
They are cool ships, but they would be completely impractical for us.

When Max Bernays was in Hawaii we had huge lines to come visit, because the ship looked "cool". The AOPVs are infinitely more useful than a Skjold would be, and they attract lots of attention.

If we build modern corvettes, we will get tons of cool, and hopefully some practical utility as well.
 
Back
Top