• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Continental Defence Corvette

If you wanted to, the AOPS can already operate both ISTAR and LUCAS drones, and since you don't usually carry a helicopter, you can stow quite a few in the hangar. After that, it becomes a matter of numbers, not improved coverage. Do you need one hundred LUCAS if you only expect to meet one or two enemy icebreakers? And how many ISTAR drones do you need to maintain coverage?

How many drones does one need?

I guess that depends on the definition of the threat? Are the UAVs only for surveillance? Are they to be suicide drones? If the later, then likely the more that are carried the better. Is an ISTAR drone the appropriate drone if a warship has a full up UVX functionality? It may not be. or it may be.

I don't know the answers here. But the questions are there, I believe. One needs to ascertain what threat(s) one wants a warship to deal with, and then work backward to come up with a design? Designing a ship backward to only launch ISTAR and LUCAS dones may ... or may not be the optimal approach.
 
In your opinion if we had an AOPS-sized drone carrier supporting normal AOPS patrolling that are capable of launching and guiding LUCAS-style drones or ISTAR drones that could be beneficial to navy operations, especially in the North?

As @Oldgateboatdriver sez...

The AOPS is a drone carrier. All it lacks are the drones. It has hangar space, deck space, a flight deck and a couple of cranes.

It can launch and recover a 13,000 kg CH-148, or at least it can by design, and it has a 20 tonne crane back aft. That allows for some pretty hefty UxVs - air, surface and subsurface. In fact it could also launch UGVs in place of the pickup and ATVs.
 
Last edited:
This 5600 km subsonic jet drone weighs in at 2700 kg or about a quarter of a Cyclone, can be stored in a 40 foot container and launches from a trailer... costs less than a Tomahawk and can carry a handful of missiles, UAVs or LMs.



 
In the spirit of making do until the Rivers and subs get here I was wondering how much could be accomplished by a pair of Halifaxes patrolling with an AOPS as a UXV mothership.

Especially if operating under an umbrella of MQ-9B, CP-140/P8, CF-18 and with a supply chain from shore supported by the CH-147, CH-148 and CH-149.

Not to mention my latest hobbyhorse, the HIMARS-PrSM combination. Nor the array of long endurance UXVs at sea supplying situational awareness.
 
The Plan B motherhip.

 
Our bigger issue, in the short term is not so much platforms as munitions.
 
Back
Top