• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Disability Pension and Retention

There is no posting allowance associated with a IPR move or local move

208.992(5) (No Entitlement) There is no entitlement to receive a Posting Allowance if any of the following conditions are satisfied:


  1. in relation to the posting, the member is prohibited from moving their dependants and household goods and effects, except when the member is authorized to move their dependants and household goods and effects to a third location;
  2. the member is posted and entitled to be moved at public expense immediately upon the member’s enrolment in the Regular Force. For greater certainty, this condition does not apply to a member who transfers to the Regular Force under QR&O article 10.05 (Voluntary Transfer From Reserve Force To The Regular Force);
  3. the member elects to receive Special Commuting Assistance under CBI 209.29 (Special Commuting Assistance (SCA));
  4. the member’s posting is cancelled;
  5. the move is a local move under the CAFRD;
  6. the member does not move; or
  7. the move is to the member’s intended place of residence (IPR) in relation to their release or transfer from the Regular Force.
Thank you so much for replying. I am going to start looking for a house and list mine on the market.

I also informed my CoC that I would like to stay working at the unit for as long as possible, as there is no need to go to the transition center early. My unit is absolutely wonderful and accommodating, so I will have no issues going to briefs, meetings and/or appointments.

I'm going over to the release administrator to start the process to open up the BGRS account and fill out the documents needed for and IPR.

This site provided me with answers 12 years ago prior to my joining and now I'm getting all the support on my way out. I'll keep this thread updated through the next year or so of my progress and what I've learned along the way for my final time in the forces.
 
Keep in mind that your unit can request you be posted to a Transition Center but the base surgeon makes a recommendation (that carries a lot of weight) and the Transition Center/group and career shop needs to ultimately support/accept your posting. It's not guaranteed simply because your unit asked. Good luck.
 
Keep in mind that your unit can request you be posted to a Transition Center but the base surgeon makes a recommendation (that carries a lot of weight) and the Transition Center/group and career shop needs to ultimately support/accept your posting. It's not guaranteed simply because your unit asked. Good luck.
My unit wouldn't request it, I was requesting it. Now after all the advice through this channel and talking with my CoC I'll be there until probably the last month before release.
 
My unit wouldn't request it, I was requesting it. Now after all the advice through this channel and talking with my CoC I'll be there until probably the last month before release.
Nice. One of the great things about the Transition Center is that all of the services they provide are equally available to you as a member of your home unit.

If you haven't done so already I highly recommend going there, finding out which "Client Service representative" is responsible for members of your home unit, and booking an appointment with them. They're civilians (often former military) who can help guide you through schooling and other medical/release benefits you're entitled to. Some will even help you fill out the overly complicated pension package (if you're entitled to one)

The Client Service reps can also talk to you about little tips and tricks that will help benefit you that the military side can't speak to you about.
 
Nice. One of the great things about the Transition Center is that all of the services they provide are equally available to you as a member of your home unit.

If you haven't done so already I highly recommend going there, finding out which "Client Service representative" is responsible for members of your home unit, and booking an appointment with them. They're civilians (often former military) who can help guide you through schooling and other medical/release benefits you're entitled to. Some will even help you fill out the overly complicated pension package (if you're entitled to one)

The Client Service reps can also talk to you about little tips and tricks that will help benefit you that the military side can't speak to you about.
Done and Done. Thank you.
 
Anyone see the new VAC Minister at the Parliamentary Committee hearings?

She was absolutely CLUELESS. Could not answer anything. Kept referring to her written script which had nothing to do with the questions.

At the Senate hearing, one of the Senators had to inform her about the Battle of Beaumont-Hamel which she had no knowledge of.

She should go back to selling woman's fashions in Vancouver.


Ottawa tinkers with veterans' disability benefits as former soldiers prepare for a fight 11 Nov 25

Changes to indexing of veterans' disability benefits were buried in federal budget

The new federal budget, if it passes, will change the way disability benefits are calculated — and that has the country’s military veterans worried that they’ll face a less generous system in the future.

The fiscal plan, tabled by Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne on Nov. 4, proposes to modify the indexing formula so that it is calculated solely on the basis of the consumer price index (CPI), or cost of living.

The change would come into effect on Jan. 1, 2027.

Up until this point, the benefit’s annual increase has been calculated using either the CPI or the average of a basket of public service salaries, whichever is greater. It is an important, generous distinction in the system, which veterans successfully lobbied for in the 1980s.

Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government will have to amend legislation in order to take the system back to what it was more than 40 years ago.

Veterans Affairs Minister Jill McKnight acknowledged on Tuesday, following the annual Remembrance Day service in Ottawa, that changes are on the way.

“What we're doing is making an adjustment to bring it in line with many other services and benefits that are offered and bringing it in line across government for consistency,” McKnight told CBC News in an interview.

She emphasized that the government is not withdrawing or cancelling any benefits, just realigning the system to ensure “consistency."

McKnight was repeatedly asked whether that means veterans will receive less than they might have under the current either/or system of benefit increases.

The minister said it’s difficult to know.

“Each individual veteran has unique experiences, time and service release, so it'll depend on each individual circumstance,” said McKnight, who also emphasized the budget’s investment of more than $180 million in improving the benefits delivery system.

'A widespread impact on veterans'​

Veterans advocates, however, aren’t as positive in their assessment.

Over the longer term, said Sean Bruyea, a former Canadian Forces captain and intelligence officer, the change will make a dramatic difference in how veterans with disabilities are compensated for their sacrifice to Canada.

Bruyea, who advocates for the rights of disabled veterans, said since January 2005, the CPI has increased about 52 per cent, but veteran disability pensions have risen 70 per cent in line with federal public service salaries.

The difference for individuals over time could amount to thousands of dollars, he said.

“That calculation affects the whole gamut of disability benefits for veterans,” Bruyea said. “So it will have a widespread impact on veterans."

Bruce Moncur, a former corporal who was wounded in Afghanistan in 2006, said it appears the federal government is poised to begin nickel-and-diming veterans once again.

He pointed to the New Veterans Charter (NVC), which, when enacted almost 20 years ago, recalculated benefits using a complex system that saw some injured soldiers paid less in disability benefits than those who had been hurt before the new system took effect.

The NVC was a sore political point for then-prime minister Stephen Harper's government, which was forced to make a series of costly adjustments. The lingering bitterness among former soldiers contributed to a swing in veterans' votes away from the Conservatives toward the Liberals in 2015.

“I've already had the rug pulled out for me once before. I'd prefer not to have it done again,” Moncur said, referring to the political battles over the NVC.

“You felt like you were fighting a bureaucratic insurance company. Eventually, I would say, without exaggeration, that most of my PTSD was not for fighting for my country but fighting my country."

Moncur, noting how the federal government is pouring billions of dollars into buying new military equipment and spending millions to attract new recruits, said it’s going to take more than signing bonuses and new kits to convince people they’re making the right choice to sign up and put on a military uniform.
 
Anyone see the new VAC Minister at the Parliamentary Committee hearings?

She was absolutely CLUELESS. Could not answer anything. Kept referring to her written script which had nothing to do with the questions.
Looked pretty bad. She reminds me of an instructor grabbed out of a hallway and told to teach a class on something the never heard of.

The language so far seems ambiguous on purpose. Frog in cold -> boiling water kind of stuff.

I'm confident at the end of the day veterans will see their benefits reduced in a number of areas. Time for them to make some sacrifices for Canada like the rest of us.
 
What is proposed is not a reduction, but a lower rate of increase.
 

SMOL: Prime Minister Mark Carney’s war on veterans goes beyond budget cuts

Robert Smol- 29 Nov 25 - Yahoo News

What might be your course of action if you wished to dilute and ultimately eliminate the government’s duty of care for disabled veterans without making it seem so obvious?

First, appoint a complete neophyte as minister of Veterans Affairs – one who has no Parliamentary or cabinet experience. A minister who would be expected to kowtow to the policy will of the Prime Minister’s Office and who can be expected to happily repeat, with sincerity, any canned talking points they receive from the man in charge.

A perfect policy fit for our new, untested, green-as-spring grass Minister of Veterans Affairs Jill McKnight.

Shrewd!

Second, you would pass a budget that would make massive cuts, say for example the 4.2 billion financial battleaxe that Prime Minister Carney is swinging at the financial heart of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Next, have your department’s public relations people associate the entire length and breadth of the multi-billion-dollar cuts with a minor decrease in the medicinal marijuana allowance.

Just like Mark Carney did with the recent budget, where the only stated target of the projected 4.23 billion cuts to Veterans Affairs was a 29% decrease in the medicinal cannabis allowance. Still widely seen as a recreational drug, blaming the cuts on Mary Jane, Ganja, Bobo (whatever young people call it today) conveniently deflects the public’ attention away from the real target of the cuts, which is the health care, financial, vocational and mental health supports, and of course the pensions – all of which disabled veterans desperately need and will likely need more of as they age.

Brilliant!

Third, and most cunningly of all, quietly delete key legislative clauses that veterans can use to substantiate their legal actions.

Like the recent legislative sleight-of-hand by the Carney government, where, in submitting their budget implementation bill, they stealthily moved to change the language veterans in long-term care used as proof they were being overcharged for services.

Currently, the formula for assessing the costs borne by the veteran in long-term care is based on the province in Canada with the lowest overall long-term care costs. This ensures that veterans, wherever they are, are not being charged inordinately high fees for their own care. However, the corresponding interpretive legislation clearly states that “province” includes Canada’s three territories.

This is important because the territories traditionally have had the lowest overall long-term care costs borne by the individual.

Yet, in defiance of the Canadian government’s own interpretation of its own legislation, the Department of Veterans Affairs has only considered the higher cost provinces, and not the lower cost territories, when calculating the costs to be borne by veterans in long-term care. Thus, overcharging veterans.

This is part of a class action scheduled to be heard beginning in 2026. Obviously, a successful class action here could result in significant retroactive payouts to veterans and their families if current court challenges succeed. It would also increase the current reimbursement rate and indexation amounts going forward.

But instead of standing up to, admitting, and correcting their mistake to the benefit of their veteran clients, the Carney government, on page 442 of the 602-page budget Implementation Bill (C-15), intends to change the language to exclude territories from the definition of province when it comes to veterans’ health care regulations. Thus, eliminating the legislative language that veterans and their advocates have been using as proof that they have been overcharged for services in long-term care.

Marvellously Machiavellian, Prime Minister Carney!

Sadly, these shrewd and draconian actions by the Carney government should be yet another political clarion call for the veteran community in Canada – one that should jar us into facing and confronting our new reality in the Canadian political landscape.

Today’s veterans, myself included, must accept the fact that, demographically, we are no longer perceived as politically relevant. Unlike the years immediately following the two World Wars, we simply do not constitute a voting block big enough for the government to take note.

Sure, governments of all political stripes will, with the utmost cheesy dramatic fervour, extol their alleged love and appreciation for us on occasions like Remembrance Day, but it is a most conditional love affair, one that is dependent on us veterans not becoming a drain on the public purse, which might outweigh our diminishing numbers and increasingly negligible value as a voting bloc.

In other words: “Thank you for your service; now go away!”

And the sooner veterans stop anticipating any universal goodwill from the government and start organizing, peacefully protesting, and self-advocating through aggressive political lobbying and more court actions, the sooner the dilution and dissemination of veteran care will stop.

– Robert Smol is a retired teacher who served in the Canadian Armed Forces reserves for more than 20 years. He is currently completing a PhD in military history. Reach him at: [email protected]
 
Back
Top