- Reaction score
- 2,283
- Points
- 1,160
Interesting RAND Report on the future of CAS.
Army prefers gatling guns over smart bombs (even small diameter bombs)
F35 is nowhere near the type of CAS platform of the A10 today, ground forces will have to change entire approach to CAS when/if A10 is retired.
F35 carries less ammunition than A10, cannot loiter as long, and is probably too fast for psychological ground effects.
A10 has at least 20-25 years more life, costs are "sunk" and maintenance is less expensive than F35, and fewer A10 required to perform CAS than F35.
No direct or indirect equivalent (ie F16 strafing or B1 bombing) can match capabilities of manned A10.
Looks like RAND isn't making any friends over at Lockheed.
Army prefers gatling guns over smart bombs (even small diameter bombs)
F35 is nowhere near the type of CAS platform of the A10 today, ground forces will have to change entire approach to CAS when/if A10 is retired.
F35 carries less ammunition than A10, cannot loiter as long, and is probably too fast for psychological ground effects.
A10 has at least 20-25 years more life, costs are "sunk" and maintenance is less expensive than F35, and fewer A10 required to perform CAS than F35.
No direct or indirect equivalent (ie F16 strafing or B1 bombing) can match capabilities of manned A10.
Looks like RAND isn't making any friends over at Lockheed.