- Reaction score
- 66
- Points
- 530
Essentially France wants NATO without the US which of course would morph into the EU Ministry of Defense. The problem with a EU military it has very little means to deploy beyond the borders of the EU.
I suspect they would also have a hard time logisitcally to deploy forces to other parts of Europe.
If there is NATO why should there be a EU military ? What does Sarkozy see as a fitting job for a French General ? I am not optimistic about the future of NATO because of the poor state of the militaries of the member states. They seem reluctant to put their troops in harms way. As a result most of the heavy lifting is left to the ABCA countries which I dont think is fair. NATO has outlived its purpose. The Russian threat to Europe is gone. Lets move on.
http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?id=7613101
I suspect they would also have a hard time logisitcally to deploy forces to other parts of Europe.
If there is NATO why should there be a EU military ? What does Sarkozy see as a fitting job for a French General ? I am not optimistic about the future of NATO because of the poor state of the militaries of the member states. They seem reluctant to put their troops in harms way. As a result most of the heavy lifting is left to the ABCA countries which I dont think is fair. NATO has outlived its purpose. The Russian threat to Europe is gone. Lets move on.
http://www.iht.com/bin/print.php?id=7613101
Sarkozy has been dropping hints that France wants to return to the military command of NATO more than four decades after de Gaulle abruptly abandoned that wing of the alliance.
In the interview, Sarkozy announced for the first time two conditions that would have to be met beforehand: American acceptance of an independent European military capability and a leading French role in NATO's command structures "at the highest level."

