- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
Loachman said:A too-completely alien concept for the poor wee thing.
+1
Loachman said:A too-completely alien concept for the poor wee thing.
georgeharper said:Oh please.To now suggest that Canada and Canadians were a target for a terrorist attack prior to 9/11 simply because some Canadians happened to be in the wrong place( the United States) at the wrong time is laughable.
Now because Canada is helping the U.S with the occupation of Afghanistan , Canada indeed is a target.
georgeharper said:...
Last I heard, Afghanistan had not launched a terrorist attack on the scale of 9/11
...
stegner said:+1
Why not lock this thread up?
georgeharper has been given a window for self-redemption. To be fair, we are not going back on our word. If he goes up the warning ladder, it will be a result of his conduct and not some abuse that we've bestowed upon him.stegner said:Why not lock this thread up?
stegner said:+1
Why not lock this thread up?
MCG said:georgeharper, you have ignored my warning at your peril. However,I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, so maybe you just missed my post. I will give you until Tuesday morning to come back and substantiate your drive-by spamming with real arguments. This warning will also be PM'ed to you so that you will not miss it. Failure to comply will result in an elevation of your warning.
Cheers,
The Staff
Canada is in Afghanistan at the request of NATO, the United Nations, and the democratically elected government of Afghanistan. Sort yourself out on the facts.
Are you recommending that Canada invade Saudi Arabia, or is this a red herring to waste our time?
ArmyVern said:And, he's been given a verbal warning IAW this site's Guidelines.
He's now been given a further warning here in the thread and via PM to start posting factual links (citations etc) to back up his claims. He now has the opportunity to engage in actual debate (instead of troll) by posting links to credible sources which back up his claims.
Many here have posted facts in response to his posts, and the mandate under which we serve in Afghanistan has been provided to debunk his claim that we are there FOR George Bush.
Should he choose to ignore, or to further troll with drive-by unsubstantiated claims, he will receive that which is due him IAW the warning system.
The next step is up to him. It's really quite that simple. He can contribute in a worthwhile manner to a debate -- or not. His choice.
This is not enmasse.ca, we do not arbitrarily ban those with opposing viewpoints simply because they are idiots and piss us off, such as the likes of georgeharper and his friend janebella witness over in their regular enmasse haunt. We are not the enmasse Facebook Group either, which outright states that their group is meant for those holding their viewpoint and their viewpoint only.
Our standards are just better than that. He's been given his fair warning. It's his to take it or leave it.
ArmyVern
The Milnet.ca Staff
RHFC_piper said:I'm quite surprised this thread is still ongoing... It seems this georgeharper person has brought a knife to a gun fight... more accurately; a dull plastic butter knife.
Conspiracy Theories backed up by hearsay and conjecture, with no hopes of proof, all based on movies (thank you Michael Moore) and media (thank you CNN) versus Fact made clear by not only empirical evidence, published accounts and unquestionable documentation, but also by those who have witnessed these events and places first hand.
geogeharper, bit of advice for you; read... read everything you can from every source. I'm not saying change you position, I'm saying; if you're going to run headlong into an argument with people who have read, witness and consumed everything there is to know about this subject, you might want to come with information to back up your position.
If you do read, and you find the evidence to prove your point, from creditable sources, by all means, post here and this might actually become an intelligent discussion... 'cause as it stands, you're arguing against proven subject matter experts, with sources to back up their statements, with nothing more than "someone said", "I heard" and "my buddy told me", none of which is helping your case. (Just because Michael Moore says it, doesn't make it so... he's been proven to bend the truth about a great many things... he can manipulate media with the best of them.)
Anyway... enough of a rant from me... On with the one sided fight.op:
stegner said:Why not lock this thread up?
Tango2Bravo said:I think that we've played the greyhound to the rabbit enough times around the race track.