- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
Buddy, even if you exclude EVERYTHING that "Climategate" was about - all the CRU's evidence, there's still massive amounts of evidence out there.
Arguing that climate change isn't real is like arguing for creationism, a pretty good way to wind up the laughing stock of the scientific community.
And yeah, MMFA has a well-known editorial slant - as does EVERY media outlet, blog, etc. But they also provide all the source material. And there's plenty of other sources. I like this one because it pulls together lots.
Arguing that climate change isn't real is like arguing for creationism, a pretty good way to wind up the laughing stock of the scientific community.
And yeah, MMFA has a well-known editorial slant - as does EVERY media outlet, blog, etc. But they also provide all the source material. And there's plenty of other sources. I like this one because it pulls together lots.
Haletown said:You've been conned buddy.
Not one of the EA CRU Investigations looked into any of the science or data or results of the "science" revealed by Climategate. They did some good lunches however.
Not one. Not the first, not the second or the last. They were government "bury the problem" inquiries, no science or science evaluation involved.
And if you think MediaMatters is a neutral organization sans agenda . . . want to buy a bridge?