• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Government hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

I had someone make a comment to me that we should start building war houses again. It's a great idea, but it would never fly with the developers, if they can build a million dollar home on the same piece of property, they are going to do what makes them money.
Or build more row houses, narrow three storey houses with connecting walls.

Hypothetically, if four row houses fit in the same plot as a single million dollar detached house, you could sell each for $250,000 and make the same amount.
 

If true this is a big deal.
PMO confirmed it's real.

 
Except you are over 50% the land mass…
If that’s the premise of your argument, then I’d say this is a 50/50 partnership where 50% of the money would be spent within Canada, on CDN companies and the Command structure would be an equal 50% partnership with a rotating US commander followed by a Canadian commander.
 
If that’s the premise of your argument, then I’d say this is a 50/50 partnership where 50% of the money would be spent within Canada, on CDN companies and the Command structure would be an equal 50% partnership with a rotating US commander followed by a Canadian commander.
Hmm, what drugs brought this out?
 
Makes me wish that I was in the line of succession for a house. I'm surprised that we haven't started looking at multigenerational mortgages.
I recall an uncle that lived in an Ontario location back in 80s/90s where the multigenerational was basically the way it worked. Most people had a mortgage they never paid off as they continued to remortgage to fund their lifestyle. When they passed their kids simply did the same thing, took over the house and continued to remortgage it as they wanted things such as boats, cars, vacations, etc. Can't recall where it was other than Ontario and a sister lived with them for a bit.
Well your the flight path to the majority of targeted if you don’t want to be the impact area, you need to accept a reasonable cost burden.
hmmm; let's think about that before deciding. Where would these impact areas be so we can determine if it is worth the cost. I personally have no issue with say a certain location in Ottawa or Toronto as an impact area and saving the money.
 
PMO confirmed it's real.

From the BBC:

 
Back
Top