• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

High Ranking Police Folk Allegedly Behaving Badly

We all know where this is going to go...

Drum roll...



Right on cue.



At first getting sent to prison for 6 months seems like a win. When you look at all the other fucked up shit he did he got off light.
He’s also 39, will now be unemployed from what was a pretty well paid job with a pension, and is basically done as soon as someone googles his name. So the lasting consequences are pretty fitting.

Though he does already have a porn name, so I guess there’s that.
 
He’s also 39, will now be unemployed from what was a pretty well paid job with a pension, and is basically done as soon as someone googles his name. So the lasting consequences are pretty fitting.
Yeah there's that. He used a key he secretly kept and let himself into a womans house where he sexually assaulted her for an hour and a half ignoring her pleas to leave.

I'm glad to see he's also losing his job.
 
Yeah there's that. He used a key he secretly kept and let himself into a womans house where he sexually assaulted her for an hour and a half ignoring her pleas to leave.

I'm glad to see he's also losing his job.
Yes, but he can only be sentenced for what he was convicted of, and that was a single guilty plea for breach of trust. We can have opinions about crown not moving forward with other charges - and believe me, I do - but at the end of the day the sentencing can’t be based on offences crown did not prove in court, or which the accused didn’t plead guilty to.
 
Plea deals both protect the legal system and keep it functional by avoiding lengthy trials, and betray the legal system by glossing over serious crimes in the interest of expediency.
I agree. I trust you’re on side with expanding physical courtroom space, hiring more judges, prosecutors and court staff, building more remanding centers and hiring more correctional staff? All of those will realistically have to happen to reduce the protective impact of plea deals on ‘the system’.
 
I agree. I trust you’re on side with expanding physical courtroom space, hiring more judges, prosecutors and court staff, building more remanding centers and hiring more correctional staff? All of those will realistically have to happen to reduce the protective impact of plea deals on ‘the system’.
Yup. Starving the legal system is a ridiculous approach. Much like wanting corrections to focus on punishment rather than rehabilitation. The latter is more expensive, but also of greater benefit to society.
 
She did not accept with the Crown’s suggestion that Robinz was well enough to pass psychological screening before joining EPS, saying she has no evidence how police screen recruits.
Maybe there needs to be heavier psychological screening for police officers, and especially former CAF ones.
 
Last edited:
Maybe there needs to be heavier psychological screening for police officers, and especially former CAF ones.
Or maybe he's an exceptional case. There's a growing number of CAF vets in my agency. Our psych screening is pretty thorough. We're about 8,500 uniforms strong and the ones I've crossed paths with are all solid folk, so far.
 
Maybe there needs to be heavier psychological screening for police officers, and especially former CAF ones.
I would be interested in some sort of large (anonymized of course) cohort study of CAF vets who’ve moved into public safety professions and whether there are any statistically significant observation as to the likelihood of being involved in any sort of founded misconduct issues. RCMP/CSC/CBSA would probably provide a pretty decently large sample for such.
 
I would be interested in some sort of large (anonymized of course) cohort study of CAF vets who’ve moved into public safety professions and whether there are any statistically significant observation as to the likelihood of being involved in any sort of founded misconduct issues. RCMP/CSC/CBSA would probably provide a pretty decently large sample for such.

What about serving members?

I've seen a non-zero number who would have been kicked out of any other organization for being psychopaths...
 
We're about 8,500 uniforms strong and the ones I've crossed paths with are all solid folk, so far.

I believe you.

I feel like a lot of former CAF members who get in shit are solid folk-until their not.

The other possibility is that these people's coworkers notice them doing fucked up shit and don't say anything about it. That opens up another can of worms, and especially concerning with public safety roles.

This guy abused his position as a police officer for 2 years with at least 8 victims. I wonder what the chances his peers had zero inclination of his behavior is.

I dont have numbers but it does feel like anytime a former CAF member gets in shit, deployments and PTSD are immediately brought up. Very possible that this is just a confirmation bias on my part.
 
I agree. I trust you’re on side with expanding physical courtroom space, hiring more judges, prosecutors and court staff, building more remanding centers and hiring more correctional staff? All of those will realistically have to happen to reduce the protective impact of plea deals on ‘the system’.

Hell, we would have to do that anyways just to meet the current demand on the system.
 
I would be interested in some sort of large (anonymized of course) cohort study of CAF vets who’ve moved into public safety professions and whether there are any statistically significant observation as to the likelihood of being involved in any sort of founded misconduct issues. RCMP/CSC/CBSA would probably provide a pretty decently large sample for such.
When I applied to federal LE I was shocked at the amount of attention given to my psychological wellbeing compared to when I joined/served in the CAF. I was even more shocked during my psych eval interview at the topics the psychologist focused on which, in my opinion, had no bearing at all on the job I was being hired to do. And he was creepy as hell!
 
Very possible that this is just a confirmation bias on my part
It might be. 'PTSD" is tossed around pretty liberally these days, particularly in court sentencing submissions. I don't think there is a solid or generally accepted set of parameters for the Disorder, at least outside of the medical community. It can range from experiencing something no person should experience to breaking up with a boyfriend.
 
It seems Toronto Police Service wins the prize in Ontario for having the first member suspended without pay following the legislative change last year.


Given the tepid response from their normally very outspoken Association, it will be interesting to hear the backstory.
 
It might be. 'PTSD" is tossed around pretty liberally these days, particularly in court sentencing submissions. I don't think there is a solid or generally accepted set of parameters for the Disorder, at least outside of the medical community. It can range from experiencing something no person should experience to breaking up with a boyfriend.

I was told I have all the signs and symptoms of PTSD but its not negatively effecting my life so no diagnosis.

So until I do something negative or dramatic or both I'm GTG.

The CAF medical system is a strange beast.
 
I don't think there is a solid or generally accepted set of parameters for the Disorder, at least outside of the medical community.
I dont want to give any site visitors ideas but I'll go out on a limb and say it's not incredibly difficult to get a PTSD diagnosis from doctors. I could talk someone through it quite easily (and to the tune of $100,000 or so from VAC).

It boils down to meeting (or "meeting") a handful of criteria from the DSM-5.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top