- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
I've added this development in the ever increasing debates on Canadian citizenship to this thread.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/lost_citizens
I'm torn on this one especially with the particular references to the CF membership and DFAIT staffers. While my personal history has had to deal with the issues of dual citizenship with my kid being born in the UK and making sure she had the right paperwork completed, and having to deal with my issue of my convoluted citizenship, I can see both sides of this issue. The UK has had some major changes to it's citizenship laws in which both the kid and I got caught in and it's taken some time to sort it all out.
However, I'm having some difficulty with the connection that the article has made to the fathering of children out of wedlock by CF personnel and diplomats. While only the most naivest of persons would not believe there are children born to CF personnel and diplomats (especially during WWII), I'm offended that these two services have been singled out as opposed to merely giving reference to any Cdn who is travelling abroad who fathers a child.
I'm torn with this issue with the direct implication that children whose parents were not married at their birth or have since birth not married, should be assumed to have citizenship of the father. Perhaps I am a little jaded with the overarching assumption that patriarchy is alive and well in the world of citizenship as I discovered with my own kid's birth that being a Cdn mother, did not give her the right to citizenship in Canada and we had to apply for it as if this 3 month old kid was a full fledged immigrant (it was actually quite humourous that I had to sponsor my own 3 month old child). Or perhaps it's just a point that a child born out of wedlock are using a point of connection to gain access to a quick immigration solution. If your read the Citizenship Act, once the child's parents were married they had no fear of not remaining a citizen - this applies to the UK as well.
What I think I'm seeing in these cases, are instances of persons who had been fathered by a Cdn, their parents never married and the appropriate paperwork was never completed. Now with the requirement of having to have a passport to head to the US, these persons are finding they did not have the appropriate paperwork completed. While i can appreciate that the citizenship requirements do not include children born out of wedlock as having an automatic claim to citizenship, I am questioning why those who have been in residence in Canada since their birth or shortly after, why they do/did not simply apply for their citizenship? In my own experience the paperwork wasn't all that difficult to complete, it just took some extra visits to the High Commission and then a trip to what was then, Immigration and Citizenship to get the kid's final papers filled out and pay the 5 bucks. I'm curious as to why these persons have never taken the steps to ensure their citizenship other than simply not being aware. If it is simply a matter of having to apply from outside of Canada as everyone else applying has to, then so be it, or simply applying now and paying the fees, taking the test and being sworn in. I mean come on, for the last 25 years, my kid has had to carry her citizenship ID, it didn't take being a rocket scientist to figure out that she was born outside Canada, and needed proof of citizenship to get back in. Is this article suggesting that these 100,000 estimated persons have never once travelled out of Canada?
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/lost_citizens
I'm torn on this one especially with the particular references to the CF membership and DFAIT staffers. While my personal history has had to deal with the issues of dual citizenship with my kid being born in the UK and making sure she had the right paperwork completed, and having to deal with my issue of my convoluted citizenship, I can see both sides of this issue. The UK has had some major changes to it's citizenship laws in which both the kid and I got caught in and it's taken some time to sort it all out.
However, I'm having some difficulty with the connection that the article has made to the fathering of children out of wedlock by CF personnel and diplomats. While only the most naivest of persons would not believe there are children born to CF personnel and diplomats (especially during WWII), I'm offended that these two services have been singled out as opposed to merely giving reference to any Cdn who is travelling abroad who fathers a child.
I'm torn with this issue with the direct implication that children whose parents were not married at their birth or have since birth not married, should be assumed to have citizenship of the father. Perhaps I am a little jaded with the overarching assumption that patriarchy is alive and well in the world of citizenship as I discovered with my own kid's birth that being a Cdn mother, did not give her the right to citizenship in Canada and we had to apply for it as if this 3 month old kid was a full fledged immigrant (it was actually quite humourous that I had to sponsor my own 3 month old child). Or perhaps it's just a point that a child born out of wedlock are using a point of connection to gain access to a quick immigration solution. If your read the Citizenship Act, once the child's parents were married they had no fear of not remaining a citizen - this applies to the UK as well.
What I think I'm seeing in these cases, are instances of persons who had been fathered by a Cdn, their parents never married and the appropriate paperwork was never completed. Now with the requirement of having to have a passport to head to the US, these persons are finding they did not have the appropriate paperwork completed. While i can appreciate that the citizenship requirements do not include children born out of wedlock as having an automatic claim to citizenship, I am questioning why those who have been in residence in Canada since their birth or shortly after, why they do/did not simply apply for their citizenship? In my own experience the paperwork wasn't all that difficult to complete, it just took some extra visits to the High Commission and then a trip to what was then, Immigration and Citizenship to get the kid's final papers filled out and pay the 5 bucks. I'm curious as to why these persons have never taken the steps to ensure their citizenship other than simply not being aware. If it is simply a matter of having to apply from outside of Canada as everyone else applying has to, then so be it, or simply applying now and paying the fees, taking the test and being sworn in. I mean come on, for the last 25 years, my kid has had to carry her citizenship ID, it didn't take being a rocket scientist to figure out that she was born outside Canada, and needed proof of citizenship to get back in. Is this article suggesting that these 100,000 estimated persons have never once travelled out of Canada?