- Reaction score
- 37,845
- Points
- 1,210
Cost per volley is a consideration.Pushing a gun to shoot very long distances, when you have HIMAR seems to be a waste.

Cost per volley is a consideration.Pushing a gun to shoot very long distances, when you have HIMAR seems to be a waste.
Not in for the 127mm The round is semi fixed where all the components are assembled mechanically on a tray just before loading.The first thing to remember is that on a ship, the round usually comes as a complete package
There is a kit offered by South Korea for the C2 version of the gunHas mounting the reserves C3/LG1 to a truck(probably a fair amount of engineering required to do so and by no means cheap) ever been considered as an option to create a light self propelled platform? I think there's a few examples of this in Ukraine at the moment and it could be a scrappy way to make the guns potentially more useful.
In the case of long range fires, seems there is a less shooting and initial cost of the gun and the shorter barrel life are also factors. If you want to get guided munitions to achieve the effect with less rounds, then the cost differential seems to narrow quite a bit?Cost per volley is a consideration.
In the case of long range fires, seems there is a less shooting and initial cost of the gun and the shorter barrel life are also factors. If you want to get guided munitions to achieve the effect with less rounds, then the cost differential seems to narrow quite a bit?

ukdefencejournal.org.uk