• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Indirect Fires Modernization Project - C3/M777 Replacement

The first thing to remember is that on a ship, the round usually comes as a complete package
Not in for the 127mm The round is semi fixed where all the components are assembled mechanically on a tray just before loading.
 
Has mounting the reserves C3/LG1 to a truck(probably a fair amount of engineering required to do so and by no means cheap) ever been considered as an option to create a light self propelled platform? I think there's a few examples of this in Ukraine at the moment and it could be a scrappy way to make the guns potentially more useful.
There is a kit offered by South Korea for the C2 version of the gun
 
Cost per volley is a consideration.
In the case of long range fires, seems there is a less shooting and initial cost of the gun and the shorter barrel life are also factors. If you want to get guided munitions to achieve the effect with less rounds, then the cost differential seems to narrow quite a bit?
 
In the case of long range fires, seems there is a less shooting and initial cost of the gun and the shorter barrel life are also factors. If you want to get guided munitions to achieve the effect with less rounds, then the cost differential seems to narrow quite a bit?

Doesn't it depend on the required muzzle velocity?

A traditional ballistic round requires higher pressures to achieve higher muzzle velocities to achieve longer ranges. 827 m/sec with charge 8 super.
A hyper-velocity ballistic round is going to exacerbate that problem I would think.
A ramjet round seems to require a muzzle velocity of 680 m/sec then the ramjet itself kicks in.

Suppose something like the Hero-120 could be fitted into a 155mm breech and launched with a low charge.

But

It may just be easier to do this


1766939176016.jpeg
 
Back
Top