• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Indirect Fires Modernization Project - C3/M777 Replacement

IMHO, we are really missing the efficiencies that reserve service can bring to an arm like the artillery if we do not form hybrid regiments. There is zero reason that all the weapon systems that the artillery should have - from M777s, to SPs, to HIMARS, to loitering munitions, to GBAD, to STA - can’t be operated by properly configured hybrid units.

🍻
To borrow a term from my kid's Harry Potter books, the Regs don't want their units contaminated with "mudbloods".
 
ROGUE update - the self-driving gun-carriage continues to develop

 
English language news media in SK is picking up on our potential interest in K9's.

Not a whole lot of new information.

Canada is the latest country eyeing the K9. Lt. Gen. Michael Wright, commander of the Canadian Army, recently told local news agency Yonhap that Ottawa is in talks with the Korean military defense giant.

"The K9 howitzers, I know, is something that Hanwha has spoken about," said Wright. "The Redback Infantry Fighting Vehicle is another example." The interview came in the backdrop of Hanwha Aerospace being a contender to supply up to 98 systems under Ottawa's roughly $1 billion Indirect Fires Modernization program.

"The Canadian Army is in the midst of our largest modernization of equipment in over 25 years, and we're looking in accordance with our defense industrial strategy — what we can do to rapidly accelerate bringing new equipment into the Canadian Army," said Wright.

 
English language news media in SK is picking up on our potential interest in K9's.

Not a whole lot of new information.




Some more, SK offering to build K9s in canada if they win the sub deal. Which likely would trigger them winning IFM.


 
Some more, SK offering to build K9s in canada if they win the sub deal. Which likely would trigger them winning IFM.



G&M is saying it may go beyond K9's. We're already getting HIMARS so Chunmoo's can probably be ruled out , but Redbacks may be in play.

 
I still say the CV90 is superior to the Redback. Plus the Redback isn't based on the K9 or use the same engine, so it doesn't have the common fleet advantage going for it.
 
G&M is saying it may go beyond K9's. We're already getting HIMARS so Chunmoo's can probably be ruled out , but Redbacks may be in play.

Chunmoos rockets are apparently HIMARS compatible. So this might be an alternative ammo supply
 
G&M is saying it may go beyond K9's. We're already getting HIMARS so Chunmoo's can probably be ruled out , but Redbacks may be in play.


HIMARS sale has approval but deal not announced yet
 
Boy Oh Boy. Talk about "inflection point."

We're looking at two key issues here - close support and deep fires. The SPs are clearly close support and the rockets deep fires.

Anyone who thinks that the close support systems - whether K9 or RCH on LAV 10x10 - will be used up North is smoking something pretty powerful. Neither system is readily transportable or capable of providing useful support up north. The current fetish for putting an SP on wheels is one I've argued against for a long time. Simply put, our SPs can realistically be expected to be used only in northern Europe; Latvia or whatever. K9 - being tracked - is a good fit for all terrain from the Baltics to Finland or Norway. Having a domestic manufacturing industry and the IP for that is worth its weight in gold. RCH will come with all the usual KNDS limitations but I think it has the current lead due to Canada's wheeled-SP-on-a-LAV fetish. But honestly, any SP will be better than what we've had for the last 20 years.

Chunmoos are a different issue. Our vision right now is for a regiment's worth of LRPS-L systems for 1 CAB for deep fires. There is, however, an underlying use-model for them as part of an anti-access/area denial role including in the North. For me, the launcher is a secondary matter. What matters is the current rocket set and the reasonably foreseeable rocket development in the future. Chunmoo looks perfectly capable of the job for 1 Div in say - Latvia. OTOH for A2/AD the nod has to be given to the developments underway for HIMARS rockets. How compatible HIMARS and Chunmoo will be with each other in the future is a crap shoot. I do wonder whether Canada couldn't play a part in rocket development if given the right jumpstart. My guess is that there is currently room for better, longer-range, more versatile (and maybe cheaper) rocket manufacture.

The APMA thing is a very interesting initiative.

Speaking of Noah. This from one of today's TSNR's posts:


Hey everyone,

With CANSEC right around the corner, the sheer volume of news, product teasers, and industry announcements is already starting to ramp up, and I want True North Strategic Review to be right in the middle of it.

If you’ve been reading TNSR for a while, you likely know the drill. Normally, I keep a pretty tight grip on what makes it onto the site as per my own editorial guidelines. I'm fairly restrictive, tightly controlled, and harsh outside of pressers to make sure we’re only focusing on the most critical updates.

But it’s CANSEC season, and for the biggest defence show of the year, I want to change things up. For the next month, I want to turn TNSR into an open field. We want to pack in as much hype, news, and talk as humanly possible before we all hit the floor in Ottawa.

So, here is the deal: For the next month only, TNSR is allowing promotional articles related to CANSEC to be published on our platform at absolutely no cost. A fair and open playing field for everyone.

Can't pay the magazines? Worried about getting lost in the sea? An SME going to CANSEC for the first time? Everyone has TNSR available to get their material out there. Go wild. Have some fun, lord knows I won't judge you for being a bit silly or dramatic.

I want to drop the usual gatekeeping and give you a space to spotlight exactly what you’re bringing to the table this year. The only catch is that the content still needs to follow our standard Editorial Guidelines. It has to be readable, relevant, and actually CANSEC related in some fashion. But otherwise? The floor is yours.

Take advantage of the TNSR mailing list. Whether you have full promotional articles, quick press releases, or vague, slightly menacing teasers of a new platform, hell even videos. Whatever you got, send it my way. Let's build some real momentum for this year's show.

Exhibitors looking to engage with TNSR at CANSEC proper can also email us to coordinate coverage oportunities and scheduling. I mean, im gonna be just messing around taking pics anyways. So like, come hang out with yo boy.

🍻
 
G&M is saying it may go beyond K9's. We're already getting HIMARS so Chunmoo's can probably be ruled out , but Redbacks may be in play.

K-2 Black Panther tanks…

I am really hopeful that Canada does go K-9, as I think tracks have it all over wheels in that sort of weight for vehicles.
 
K-2 Black Panther tanks…

I am really hopeful that Canada does go K-9, as I think tracks have it all over wheels in that sort of weight for vehicles.

Different company. K9, Redback, and Chunmoo are all made by Hanwha Aerospace.

Wouldn't be against it however, it would just take a whole lot more deal making and internal negotiation in SK on their side of things.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top