• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Informing the Army’s Future Structure

How many of those volunteer hours are parents volunteering with their kids activities? How many are charitable work? How do those types of volunteering in any way align with military capabilities/defence?

Per the StatsCan package posted, in 2018, "contributing an average of 45 hours to improving their community through activities like maintaining a park or public space".

45 hours to improve their communities. That, to me, indicates the civic mindedness comparable to that shown by the Home Guard.

These are not full time soldiers. They will not be changing engines (unless the happened to be diesel mechanics IRL). They will not be planning exercises (unless they happen to be planners IRL). Thet are volunteering to do what is asked of them to help maintain their community.
 
Per the StatsCan package posted, in 2018, "contributing an average of 45 hours to improving their community through activities like maintaining
The net was cast so wide the data is essentially worthless. I helped my neighbour move a heavy object once, so that counts toward the numbers.
 
....

This monkey is going to stop chasing weasels round the mulberry bush.

....

Reg Forces only.

How big an Army does Canada need? And how much should we pay for it?

Go back to first principles of threats and intent and geography and tell me how big a standing army do I need to hire so that I can put my feet up and ignore the rest of the world. How much do I have to pay for that peace of mind?
 
Give you the kit and a plan? So, hand hold you? The kit isn't coming for years and the sustainment and training plan should be coming from the PRes if they want it.
I will argue vehemently for the reverse. The Res F can not and should not plan to sustain and train itself, except at the lowest level (decentralized execution of central planning). By central planning, I mean more than the usual statement of aims which gets passed off as "plan" in political arenas. The more latitude given to inadequate Res F leaders to plan their own stuff, the more stuff will go off the rails. If the Res F leadership were composed of sufficiently educated people successful in complex endeavours, we'd be golden. However, often enough - and without disparaging occupations, but acknowledging that some don't prepare people to plan and execute complex undertakings - they are worker bees in public service and private organizations with generous provisions for making time for Res F commitments.

Obviously more successful models of deployable/employable reserve forces are out there. We could evaluate them and pick one and/or blend a few. I suppose we'd end up with a Res F with a greater fraction of Reg F commanding, administering, and training.

Also obvious is that the foundational problem is money. The Reg F want to carefully allocate insufficient PYs, and the Res F is low on the list. The government wants to minimize capital and operating expenses for equipment and facilities.

We could make plans to fit ambitions (ie. a force mobilized for war, sustainable according to the grim arithmetic of casualties and cohorts) and figure out which parts are achievable. We could make plans to fit resources. We should do the former; resources currently are so limited as to produce almost nothing except augmentees and CTs, and we ought to question whether the total spend on the Res F is worth what the Reg F gets through those two pipelines.
 
I will argue vehemently for the reverse. The Res F can not and should not plan to sustain and train itself, except at the lowest level (decentralized execution of central planning). By central planning, I mean more than the usual statement of aims which gets passed off as "plan" in political arenas. The more latitude given to inadequate Res F leaders to plan their own stuff, the more stuff will go off the rails.

This is why the 'Awkward Squad' Division will likely fail.

When the CO turns up in rented SUV for an hour on the weekend FTX to yell at people for wearing a coyote dump bag, and then heads home in time to referee the kids' basketball game ...
 
This is why the 'Awkward Squad' Division will likely fail.

When the CO turns up in rented SUV for an hour on the weekend FTX to yell at people for wearing a coyote dump bag, and then heads home in time to referee the kids' basketball game ...
Bane of many units. How the f*ck enthusiastic no-nonsense soldiering-focused new officers end up as Col Blimps ready for retirement into the unit association escapes me.
 
This is why the 'Awkward Squad' Division will likely fail.

When the CO turns up in rented SUV for an hour on the weekend FTX to yell at people for wearing a coyote dump bag, and then heads home in time to referee the kids' basketball game ...

Here's where I part company. I honestly believe that the DoC Division can work.

But it will require reg force engagement by people that want to be there, that feel their endeavours wilk be rewarded and that want to work with civilians that want to learn how to soldier.

It will also require civilians that fully understand what they are getting in to and the terms and conditions under which they are offering their services.

And both sides will have to commit to their contracts.

If the civilians want a full time career then they can go regs.

The army needs to put as much effort into making its civilians a useful force as it does its regs.
 
I can have troops practice climbing, jumping, marching and shooting on a training night.

I can have troops practice driving a truck on a training night.

I can probably get troops to practice changing the oil or a tire in a training night.

I cant get troops pull an engine/powerpack strip it down, rebuild it, reinstall it and test it in a training night.
I think that the one thing we have to change is the concept of where individual training (IT) and collective training (CT) happens in the ARes.

IMHO, the first thing as far as IT is concerned is that DP1 for NCMs and officers need to be identical for ARes and RegF. That requires upping what the ARes currently does, but also reducing RegF courses to their fundamental "must knows" and repackaging courses into blocks of 25 days each.

DP 1 courses need to be "mandatory" training. And for all ARes pers, DP1 courses need to be mandatory. A high school student would be able to take two x 25 day blocks in a given summer. A college or university student probably four such blocks and both could take one block during the winter on a one 2.5 day weekend per month for ten months. Accordingly a high school student recruited as an NCM before the end of June in year 1 would complete five months of training by the end of August of year 2. That's adequate for most trades. Officer candidates would take the same summer training cycle as their RegF RMC counterparts and have DP1 completed by the end of their university schooling. All other training for NCMs and officers post DP 1 would be voluntary so people can progress or not progress as they wish.

Higher end technical trades can be addressed by having a system whereby individual DP1 students learned the technical trade during the winters at a civilian community college or university with a military subsidy for tuition but not pay. The DP1 blocks are military skills conversion courses that build on the basic skills learned at the CC or university.

All DP1 candidates are placed on a basic training list (BTL) managed by a regional "depot" battalion which belongs to the army's individual training group (CITG) which has several "depot" companies providing DP1 training at various location in their region. That could be at a regional training facility and/or at a local location such as an armoury, as appropriate. Note that CITG and its units are also responsible for the RegF BTL. (As well as the advanced training list (ATL) for both RegF and ARes.)

All ARes recruits sign up for an obligatory period of service that covers the time spent on mandatory DP1 training plus - let's say for example - three years of collective training with a unit afterwards plus three years of Supplementary reserve service after releasing from the primary reserve.

Once trained to the DP 1 standard the individual is transferred from the BTL to a given ARes unit for CT.

A Unit's CT cycle starts in September of each year and consists of ten mandatory 2.5 day training weekends (Sept - June) and one 16.5 day summer exercise in August leaving July free for vacation time. During the winter cycle the unit follows a rigorous army directed training program that includes such things as annual refresher and qualification training and some preparatory training for the summer exercise. The format of the summer exercise is also directed and resourced by the army to provide the appropriate level of collective training desired for the unit by the army. As an example in year 1 the unit concentrates the full two weeks on defence; in year 2 the advance to contact or whatever outcome the army considers appropriate in order to gradually develop the skill sets needed by the unit.

Progression to DP2 and above is entirely voluntary and is again managed through an ATL run through the CITG and its subordinate depot battalions and companies. Such programs will be explicitly run during period when the units CT training is not occurring. In short, everyone is there for unit mandatory CT and some individuals, who volunteer, take additional DP2 and above training in the off time on either training nights or (more probably) a 2.5 day weekend per month and on summer courses. DP2 and above training takes place at military schools, training centres or local armouries as appropriate.

Again for DP2 and above courses, the system must closely mirror ARes training with RegF training. Again, each type of course must be rigorously designed and broken into blocks into must knows - which everyone, RegF and ARes must take - and could and should knows - which aren't necessary for an ARes member but which are desirable for full timers. This not only facilitates the training of ARes members in the essential knowledge and skills needed to progress, but also facilitates transfer between components in clearly identifying training that a transferee needs to complete to retain or regain his ARes rank.

The ARes system must be set up in such a way that all ARes members have an attainable path to the ranks of major and MWO through part-time service and courses. Promotion to LCol and CWO and above would only be available to individuals who have completed the RegF side of DP 2 and above training. My hard line in the sand is that since the intent is to have ARes units as deployable and viable entities it is essential that the most senior offr and NCM in each unit have the training and much of the experience necessary to not only command the unit in a tactical sense but to oversee the administration of the unit as a CAF entity. I can also see that ARes soldiers up to the rank of major could, with just their ARes training occupy part-time staff positions in their units and at higher formations.

Progression through DP2 training for the ARes should be fairly simple, matters become more complex at DP3 and above levels and need to be examined in detail. If one looks at the average unit of 550-600 personnel, roughly 360-400 are DP1 privates and corporals. The remaining 200 or so are leaders; roughly 100 master corporals, and another 90 or so as sergeants and WOs. Another 40 or so are officers of which roughly 30 are DP1 captains and lieutenants and roughly seven majors and one lieutenant colonel. With an estimated 10% annual turnover rate of releases and component transfer, that means that each battalion must be provided with two platoons of newly trained DP1s every year while the battalion can expect to have an 80-90% complement of DP1 trained personnel some of whom will need DP2 and above progression training. Most important is DP2 training to handle the specialized capabilities for the 500 or so members of the unit who are the "workers." That should be made as simple as possible, again in course blocks as early in a members career as possible. For example there is no reason why a private coming off DP1 training and joining his unit in September of year 2, can't attend a one block LAV or IFV driver's course voluntarily training on weekends in the winter and/or a month in the summer. Some training could attract additional periods of obligatory service while retention bonuses could be offered to individuals at the end of their existing obligatory service periods.

A fundamental change in Canada's attitude to military service is the concept of getting rid of "parade when you feel like it" to easily manageable mandatory training requirements and periods of obligatory service to "pay back" the costs of training and introduce some stability into the units composition year-to-year. IMHO, the ARes cannot be "fixed" until the primary reserve is restructured to incorporate these concepts. There are other elements such as employer legislation etc, but I've gone on long enough.

🍻
 
Last edited:
I think that the one thing we have to change is the concept of where individual training (IT) and collective training (CT) happens in the ARes.

IMHO, the first thing as far as IT is concerned is that DP1 for NCMs and officers need to be identical for ARes and RegF. That requires upping what the ARes currently does, but also reducing RegF courses to their fundamental "must knows" and repackaging courses into blocks of 25 days each.

DP 1 courses need to be "mandatory" training. And for all ARes pers, DP1 courses need to be mandatory. A high school student would be able to take two x 25 day blocks in a given summer. A college or university student probably four such blocks and both could take one block during the winter on a one 2.5 day weekend per month for ten months. Accordingly a high school student recruited as an NCM before the end of June in year 1 would complete five months of training by the end of August of year 2. That's adequate for most trades. Officer candidates would take the same summer training cycle as their RegF RMC counterparts and have DP1 completed by the end of their university schooling. All other training for NCMs and officers post DP 1 would be voluntary so people can progress or not progress as they wish.

Higher end technical trades can be addressed by having a system whereby individual DP1 students learned the technical trade during the winters at a civilian community college or university with a military subsidy for tuition but not pay. The DP1 blocks are military skills conversion courses that build on the basic skills learned at the CC or university.

All DP1 candidates are placed on a basic training list (BTL) managed by a regional "depot" battalion which belongs to the army's individual training group (CITG) which has several "depot" companies providing DP1 training at various location in their region. That could be at a regional training facility and/or at a local location such as an armoury, as appropriate. Note that CITG and its units are also responsible for the RegF BTL. (As well as the advanced training list (ATL) for both RegF and ARes.)

All ARes recruits sign up for an obligatory period of service that covers the time spent on mandatory DP1 training plus - let's say for example - three years of collective training with a unit afterwards plus three years of Supplementary reserve service after releasing from the primary reserve.

Once trained to the DP 1 standard the individual is transferred from the BTL to a given ARes unit for CT.

A Unit's CT cycle starts in September of each year and consists of ten mandatory 2.5 day training weekends (Sept - June) and one 16.5 day summer exercise in August leaving July free for vacation time. During the winter cycle the unit follows a rigorous army directed training program that includes such things as annual refresher and qualification training and some preparatory training for the summer exercise. The format of the summer exercise is also directed and resourced by the army to provide the appropriate level of collective training desired for the unit by the army. As an example in year 1 the unit concentrates the full two weeks on defence; in year 2 the advance to contact or whatever outcome the army considers appropriate in order to gradually develop the skill sets needed by the unit.

Progression to DP2 and above is entirely voluntary and is again managed through an ATL run through the CITG and its subordinate depot battalions and companies. Such programs will be explicitly run during period when the units CT training is not occurring. In short, everyone is there for unit mandatory CT and some individuals, who volunteer, take additional DP2 and above training in the off time on either training nights or (more probably) a 2.5 day weekend per month and on summer courses. DP2 and above training takes place at military schools, training centres or local armouries as appropriate.

Again for DP2 and above courses, the system must closely mirror ARes training with RegF training. Again, each type of course must be rigorously designed and broken into blocks into must knows - which everyone, RegF and ARes must take - and could and should knows - which aren't necessary for an ARes member but which are desirable for full timers. This not only facilitates the training of ARes members in the essential knowledge and skills needed to progress, but also facilitates transfer between components in clearly identifying training that a transferee needs to complete to retain or regain his ARes rank.

The ARes system must be set up in such a way that all ARes members have an attainable path to the ranks of major and MWO through part-time service and courses. Promotion to LCol and CWO and above would only be available to individuals who have completed the RegF side of DP 2 and above training. My hard line in the sand is that since the intent is to have ARes units as deployable and viable entities it is essential that the most senior offr and NCM in each unit have the training and much of the experience necessary to not only command the unit in a tactical sense but to oversee the administration of the unit as a CAF entity. I can also see that ARes soldiers up to the rank of major could, with just their ARes training occupy part-time staff positions in their units and at higher formations.

Progression through DP2 training for the ARes should be fairly simple, matters become more complex at DP3 and above levels and need to be examined in detail. If one looks at the average unit of 550-600 personnel, roughly 360-400 are DP1 privates and corporals. The remaining 200 or so are leaders; roughly 100 master corporals, and another 90 or so as sergeants and WOs. Another 40 or so or so are officers of which roughly 30 are DP1 captains and lieutenants and roughly seven majors and one lieutenant colonel. With an estimated 10% annual turnover rate of releases and component transfer, that means that each battalion must be provided with two platoons of newly trained DP1s every year while the battalion can expect to have an 80-90% complement of DP1 trained personnel some of whom will need DP2 and above progression training. Most important is DP2 training to handle of the the specialized capabilities for the 500 or so members of the unit who are the "workers." That should be made as simple as possible, again in course blocks as early in a members career as possible. For example there is no reason why a private coming off DP1 training and joining his unit in September of year 2, can't attend a one block LAV or IFV driver's course voluntarily training on weekends in the winter and/or a month in the summer. Some training could attract additional periods of obligatory service while retention bonuses could be offered to individuals at the end of their existing obligatory service periods.

A fundamental change in Canada's attitude to military service is the concept of getting rid of "parade when you feel like it" to easily manageable mandatory training requirements and periods of obligatory service to "pay back" the costs of training and introduce some stability into the units composition year-to-year. IMHO, the ARes cannot be "fixed" until the primary reserve is restructured to incorporate these concepts. There are other elements such as employer legislation etc, but I've gone on long enough.

🍻

Stop thinking of days and start thinking of periods of instruction and courses. Just like any other educational system. Test the Major Training Points and move on.
 
Stop thinking of days and start thinking of periods of instruction and courses. Just like any other educational system. Test the Major Training Points and move on.
The two concepts work together. You need to think in days because that's how the whole public service/military complex operates. It's fundamental to pay which is what makes the PS world go round. It's also fundamental to programming.

I'm of the view that 25 day blocks (which fit nicely into a six days a week training course structure) can easily be broken into week-long or two week modules where required or where desirable. For a military training system that needs to provide "book learnin'" confirmed by "hands-on learnin'" in just about everything, an arrangement of a series of standardized, interlocking and progressive blocks of a set number of days is required.

In fact, these blocks and modules are "periods of instruction and courses ... like any other educational system." Testing the major training points are a part of that as is distance learning in addition to physical course attendance. Don't mistake content and methodology with a clearly defined management structure.

🍻
 
The two concepts work together. You need to think in days because that's how the whole public service/military complex operates. It's fundamental to pay which is what makes the PS world go round. It's also fundamental to programming.

I'm of the view that 25 day blocks (which fit nicely into a six days a week training course structure) can easily be broken into week-long or two week modules where required or where desirable. For a military training system that needs to provide "book learnin'" confirmed by "hands-on learnin'" in just about everything, an arrangement of a series of standardized, interlocking and progressive blocks of a set number of days is required.

In fact, these blocks and modules are "periods of instruction and courses ... like any other educational system." Testing the major training points are a part of that as is distance learning in addition to physical course attendance. Don't mistake content and methodology with a clearly defined management structure.

🍻

We're getting to our usual asymptote.

Take students that are used to book learning and feed them.

Use Wednesday nights for tests and confirmation.

Use weekends for physical activities, field work, ranges, driving, first aid, comms...

Then use one 12 day period for small unit training.

Repeat 4 times and then take the kid into a unit for a few months of OJT.
 
So no reserve for the other trades when they start taking casualties? Not exactly a recipe for success.
The Primary Reserve is not the only way to create strategic depth in technical occupations.

CAF could create a secondary occupations list where reservists (primary, secondary, and even COATS) are tracked based on civilian vocations that do not match their trained military occupation.

CAF could maintain “surplus capacity” in Reg F technical occupations. An example of this might look like a Reg F maintenance platoon for every ARes infantry battalion.
 
The Primary Reserve is not the only way to create strategic depth in technical occupations.

CAF could create a secondary occupations list where reservists (primary, secondary, and even COATS) are tracked based on civilian vocations that do not match their trained military occupation.

CAF could maintain “surplus capacity” in Reg F technical occupations. An example of this might look like a Reg F maintenance platoon for every ARes infantry battalion.

In BC dairies I had to have an electrician, a mechanic and a fitter with me to service a pump and I had to tell which screw to turn in which direction in which order.

In prairie dairies the operator and I worked together to achieve the same task in a fraction of the time. More complex tasks were handled by the maintenance man cum boiler operator cum fitter cum electrician cum carpenter.

You can have lead hands in a team with individual skills that can teach the others their skills.
 
The Primary Reserve is not the only way to create strategic depth in technical occupations.

CAF could create a secondary occupations list where reservists (primary, secondary, and even COATS) are tracked based on civilian vocations that do not match their trained military occupation.

CAF could maintain “surplus capacity” in Reg F technical occupations. An example of this might look like a Reg F maintenance platoon for every ARes infantry battalion.
I'm the last guy to say that something can't be done but in this case the attempt was there before back in the 2000s. It failed for a number of reasons mostly lack of resources and a decent methodology. The CAF is a little anal when it comes to creating "equivalencies" for civilian trades and occupations that vary widely from province to province and across industries.

What's needed is a fairly easy to use system of drill down data entry and search forms that make it easy for a recruiter or clerk to enter/capture the info so that it can be easily and logically searched to find relevant results. DND is not famous for its search engines. (and don't forget it needs to be bilingual). Sigh.

🍻
 
The current construct of ARes occupation management doesn't enable that now.

If the current ARes was designed to be the push for land based national mobilization it would have much different construct. Right now its designed to be part time RegF and fill individual holes for 6 month rotations.
Which is IMHO f’d up as it takes 6+ months work up.

The current system doesn’t really support any positions over WO or Captain in the PRes as those holes they fill are below Coy level.
 
Back
Top