- Reaction score
- 11,409
- Points
- 1,040
That is emphatically untrue, unless you move the goalposts to "certain things in the middle east".They have always gone to war with at least a coalition of the willing.

That is emphatically untrue, unless you move the goalposts to "certain things in the middle east".They have always gone to war with at least a coalition of the willing.
They have a 'need' for the bases, the air bases for certain. Hence why Spain was smack across the knuckles and the UK as well with Diego Garcia.
Clearly the US should be recruiting its plans staff from this web site. We know so much about what should have been done.with not much for assets in theatre required to achieve any of the stated or suggested objectives
That is emphatically untrue, unless you move the goalposts to "certain things in the middle east".
I haven't read anything that Spain has changed its decision. I've only read that US planes were forced to operate elsewhere. Has there been reports that Spain is allowing US planes to use its bases for attacking Iran?And yet both got back in line and still weren't consulted or invited.
That tells me everything I need to know about that power balance and who needs who.
Yes you’re right. They always went alone when bigfooting around Latin America.
There were a handful of Caribbean countries that joined them in Grenada.
Iran will not be like their previous Latin American actions.
But my point stands that for all their major wars since and including the Second World War, they had allies.
The 2 of you in agreement and in tandem leads me to believe that someone's accounts have been hacked. I just don't know which one at this moment......Clearly the US should be recruiting its plans staff from this web site. We know so much about what should have been done.
I haven't read anything that Spain has changed its decision. I've only read that US planes were forced to operate elsewhere. Has there been reports that Spain is allowing US planes to use its bases for attacking Iran?
The Brits will do just about anything, possibly even throwing a fellow Commonwealth member under the bus, in order to keep their 'special' relationship alive.
They had god on their side and he would protect them deliver them righteous vengeance upon the invader! That or the choice was sortie or watch your family get shot. Or maybe they regime has managed to control information so well that they were able to lie to the crew and made them believe it was safe to sortie? Lots of options.I am really curious why the Iranian navy is sallying out? Suicidal heroism? Hoping to get at least one kill? They must know that the minute they start moving the countdown is on.
I am sure the US loves its bases in Spain, Naval Station Rota is a lot of fun for example, but the US can still power project and sustain with out it.
So who needs who ?
Agreed on the UK but with Spain, is that a path that the US wants to really go down?Honestly I wasn't paying attention. And still the US went ahead with its operation and didn't consult them or invite them. Skipped right over them perhaps ? Who needs who ?
I am sure the US loves its bases in Spain, Naval Station Rota is a lot of fun for example, but the US can still power project and sustain with out it.
So who needs who ?
I wonder if they had 'Gott mit uns' on their belt buckles.They had god on their side and he would protect them deliver them righteous vengeance upon the invader! That or the choice was sortie or watch your family get shot. Or maybe they regime has managed to control information so well that they were able to lie to the crew and made them believe it was safe to sortie? Lots of options.
Agreed on the UK but with Spain, is that a path that the US wants to really go down?
The US can't do jack shit economically against Spain because they are 1 of 27 in the EU trade agreement. Germany has already publicly stated this at the White House in front of Trump. Who's to say that another and another EU country says, nah, we don't want you using bases within our country for this purpose. I mean look, Denmark announced yesterday that it was signing an agreement with France regarding nuclear deterrence. Would this have even been possible 14 months ago? As I've said elsewhere on here, all it takes is 1 person to change things up - either for the good or the bad.
I don't disagree with you - but, would they be willing to lose/leave behind every single base outside of the UK within Europe? The only potential presence they would have in the Med 'might' be Cyprus IF the UK granted them. Currently the UK has NOT given them permission to use Cyprus at all.Have they shown you an indication they care much for alliances ?
I also don't think the US would care much if Europe said they can go home. I think they would happily leave Europe to Europeans.
Are you? Are you sure that you're not sure?It's also in line with what every other ally has said. Or even how conflicted most people feel. Not sure why his statement is getting hate when it's the closest to reality.
I don't disagree with you - but, would they be willing to lose/leave behind every single base outside of the UK within Europe? The only potential presence they would have in the Med 'might' be Cyprus IF the UK granted them. Currently the UK has NOT given them permission to use Cyprus at all.
Its a long flight from Lossiemouth to the Turkey/ME.
Lastly, this current clown show very well might just be shut down come November if the Maga's lose both Houses. It's starting to feel a bit like the Last 100 days of the 3rd Reich right now - and NO, I'm NOT comparing politically, or morally, the 2 of them - I'm referring to the final days of a political entity and its flaying around to survive and to try to push through at whatever costs its last policies.