• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Iran Super Thread- Merged

I'd hope that even the current administration learned the lessons of the last 40 years well enough to know that's a bad idea.
The US gave them tons of great kit, might as well get a return on it. Plus if the russians or Iran kill them then that weapons Afghanistan for you know who to come back.
 
The US gave them tons of great kit, might as well get a return on it. Plus if the russians or Iran kill them then that weapons Afghanistan for you know who to come back.
I have quite a bit of real world experience in this realm, albeit mostly with Iraq. The US Congress released funds to CENTCOM to buy eqpt from US manufacturers. The manufacturers are big supporters of the various PACs etc. They support members of Congress who will ensure that "Foreign Assistance" is also "Corporate Welfare", and "Political Fundraising". Not a single altruistic intent in that sordid process.
 
I have quite a bit of real world experience in this realm, albeit mostly with Iraq. The US Congress released funds to CENTCOM to buy eqpt from US manufacturers. The manufacturers are big supporters of the various PACs etc. They support members of Congress who will ensure that "Foreign Assistance" is also "Corporate Welfare", and "Political Fundraising". Not a single altruistic intent in that sordid process.
Canadian foreign aid also is problematic with its industry ties.
 
2 small windows per day now, totally "winning".

Does Iran still have the capability to track the amount of AD that the US is using and/or has used in total? If so, I would expect that info has found its way to the Russians.
 
Does Iran still have the capability to track the amount of AD that the US is using and/or has used in total?
Unlikely.




If so, I would expect that info has found its way to the Russians.
Several others in the region can. Not all who would safeguard it well.

Additionally I’m fairly sure that the Russians have satellites overhead looking for targeting info to feed Iran as well as see what is getting fired in defense.
 
So Trump is both holding up the process of ending this, and also demanding a ransom from the international community? Am I understanding this correctly?


1789404224391.png

1789404193092.png

1789404170705.png


Also it's the other war, not my war causing it!

 
This report is as of 29 June, so all information is 2.5 months out of date - which means, all information/data is ‘lower’ than what the current information would be.
With that being said:

“Iranian strikes have damaged and destroyed ‘hundreds of buildings and structures’ at US bases in the Middle East.”
As well as;
“dozens of US aircraft.”

“The report also said the expenditure of U.S. munitions during the conflict had “resulted in strategic inventory shortfalls.”

Pentagon reveals $33.4 billion Iran war bill and ‘strategic’ weapons shortfalls
Pentagon reveals $33.4 billion Iran war bill and ‘strategic’ weapons shortfalls
 
This report is as of 29 June, so all information is 2.5 months out of date - which means, all information/data is ‘lower’ than what the current information would be.
With that being said:

“Iranian strikes have damaged and destroyed ‘hundreds of buildings and structures’ at US bases in the Middle East.”
As well as;
“dozens of US aircraft.”

“The report also said the expenditure of U.S. munitions during the conflict had “resulted in strategic inventory shortfalls.”

Pentagon reveals $33.4 billion Iran war bill and ‘strategic’ weapons shortfalls
Pentagon reveals $33.4 billion Iran war bill and ‘strategic’ weapons shortfalls
IMG_4947.jpeg
Note the date of the Aircraft Loss report is 14 May.


Glass Half full, 👀. over 40b in Arms sales into the region.
 
Jeezus…

Until recently, the array of American bases surrounding Iran gave that country’s leaders every reason to fear being overwhelmed militarily if they moved to control the strait. Yet the regime remains intact, even after attacks by the United States and Israel succeeded in killing top Iranian leaders, and its long-range missile and drone attacks managed to elude American air defenses and incapacitated many U.S. facilities. In March, fewer than two weeks into the fighting, The New York Times identified 17 American bases, air-defense installations, and diplomatic facilities that had been hit. Among them were some of the U.S. military’s important staging points: the Fifth Fleet’s headquarters in Bahrain as well as the Ali Al Salem Air Base, Camp Arifjan, and Camp Buehring in Kuwait.


The effect of these losses on U.S. operations was nearly instantaneous. A key reason the Trump administration did not militarily escalate with Iran over the summer, despite all of its threats to do so, was the loss of the base in Bahrain—which the Navy had relied on for decades to resupply ships in the Middle East. Instead, the so-called logistical tail for U.S. naval operations had to stretch all the way to Diego Garcia, a British-controlled island in the Indian Ocean more than 2,000 miles from the Strait of Hormuz.
Complications to resupply efforts raise costs, reduce operational efficiency, and add to the strain on military personnel. Disrupted logistics contributed to the long deployment of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, which led in turn to low morale. According to Stars and Stripes, families of crew members on the Lincoln feared that the many months at sea were causing serious mental-health problems.
For the moment—and likely for longer—the bases taken out of commission by Iranian attacks have been largely abandoned as operational facilities because of the continuing threat to U.S. personnel and equipment. At a recent town-hall meeting, Navy Timeshas reported, a service member asked Admiral Daryl Caudle about retrieving personal items from the Bahrain base. “We’re not getting back in there anytime soon,” Caudle responded. “I just want to be completely honest with that.”
The vulnerability of U.S facilities near Iran is so great and the prospective cost of repair is so large that, as The Washington Post reported last month, administration officials might not want to rebuild them at all. One way to spin the situation is as a “once-in-a-generation chance for the Pentagon to reconsider its presence” in the Persian Gulf region, as the Post put it. But the basic fact is that defending key facilities against even a less technologically advanced foe such as Iran is not something that the U.S. military can currently do.


Archive:
 
Back
Top