• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Iraq in Crisis- Merged Superthread

I don't believe we are losing against ISIS, we don't really have anything to lose other than maybe political face?  Besides, it's not as if Iraq is even really a country anymore anyways.  Looking at the entire region we really have Salafistan (disguised as Sunnistan), headquartered in Riyadh (with satellite campuses in Raqqa and Mosul) vs pretty much everyone else with the biggest adversary being Shiitestan headquartered in Tehran.

We don't need to annihilate ISIS, we merely need to hold them at bay long enough so they burn out.  A handful of pyrrhic victories on their part doesn't mean they are all of a sudden making sweeping gains.  Our present commitment can pretty much be sustained indefinitely and I think would further benefit from the occasional targeted surge to deny the Salafists freedom of movement.

If any ground force is to be committed against ISIS, it needs to be with a specific objective in mind.  In my opinion, the most logical area for a ground force is in the Syrian Desert/Anbar Province along the periphery of the Euphrates river system.  We would then deny use of this area to the Salafists, an area which is really the soft underbelly of the Iraqi government.  This would also allow us to launch raids against Salafist supply lines and operate in terrain that is favorable to our forces.

Meanwhile, the moderate Sunni and Shiite could do the heavy lifting along the Euphrates river system making good use of our air power. 

Something else that has never been mentioned, but something that I think the Iraqi Government should strongly consider is forced resettlement, with Western money of course.  This would be a mixed of scorched-earth, i.e. bulldozing down entire villages in order to deny their use to the enemy which will have the effect of stretching his supply lines, hopefully to the breaking point.  Along with this plan though, they should replace these now bulldozed villages/towns with a smaller number of strategically located, heavily fortified cantonments that not only improve security but also have the effect of improving the local populaces quality of life.





 
RoyalDrew said:
Something else that has never been mentioned, but something that I think the Iraqi Government should strongly consider is forced resettlement, with Western money of course.  This would be a mixed of scorched-earth, i.e. bulldozing down entire villages in order to deny their use to the enemy which will have the effect of stretching his supply lines, hopefully to the breaking point.  Along with this plan though, they should replace these now bulldozed villages/towns with a smaller number of strategically located, heavily fortified cantonments that not only improve security but also have the effect of improving the local populaces quality of life.

Nobody would stay in Al-Anbar. If you bulldoze their home villages, they will become IDPs in Sunni neighbourhoods in Baghdad, they won't move from their home village to another village, even if it's more fortified than the old one. Now, if Baghdad was a success story, with lots of jobs and decent security (like Saigon was 1965-1972) then forced relocation can work to a degree. But forcing more IDPs into Baghdad at this stage probably isn't a great idea, you just risk making the security situation in the capital even worse than it is, and pissed off refugees make excellent suicide bombers.
 
Ostrozac said:
Nobody would stay in Al-Anbar. If you bulldoze their home villages, they will become IDPs in Sunni neighbourhoods in Baghdad, they won't move from their home village to another village, even if it's more fortified than the old one. Now, if Baghdad was a success story, with lots of jobs and decent security (like Saigon was 1965-1972) then forced relocation can work to a degree. But forcing more IDPs into Baghdad at this stage probably isn't a great idea, you just risk making the security situation in the capital even worse than it is, and pissed off refugees make excellent suicide bombers.

You are implying that we would give them a choice to move to the new village or not.  If I had my way, they wouldn't have a choice.  It would essentially be 1) Move to this new village we built for you or.... 2) Head West towards Raqqa and hang out with your Salafist friends.

Harsh but it worked for the Brits in Malaya and the Portuguese in Angola.
 
The problem as others have noted is that the Shia majority have marginalized the Sunnis.For the time being they would prefer to live under the IS.As we discovered when we invaded Iraq the Iraqi Army was a poor performer.Against a motivated force of fanatics,they are no match.They wont fight even knowing that IS will kill them if captured.Unless Iran takes over the shia areas,the black flag will be flying over Baghdad and the US will be facing a very public humiliation.
 
tomahawk6 said:
The problem as others have noted is that the Shia majority have marginalized the Sunnis.For the time being they would prefer to live under the IS.As we discovered when we invaded Iraq the Iraqi Army was a poor performer.Against a motivated force of fanatics,they are no match.They wont fight even knowing that IS will kill them if captured.Unless Iran takes over the shia areas,the black flag will be flying over Baghdad and the US will be facing a very public humiliation.


The Iraqi Army is a farce because Iraq isn't a real state.  If we support the Iraqi government it means we support the Shiites, if that means supporting Shiite militia then so be it.  I'll take Iranians over Salafists any day.  Same goes for Assad over Jihadists which is what will ultimately replace him if he falls. 

I don't think ISIS has the power to take on Baghdad.  ISIS is seeking to consolidate the gains it has already made while trying to show, through targeted operations such as what we are seeing in Ramadi and Palmyra that they are strong, which plays to propping up their power base. 

 
They routed the IA in Ramadi with 400 fighters.They were outnumbered by the IA and yet they now hold a huge territory from Syria through Iraq mainly through fear.
 
tomahawk6 said:
They routed the IA in Ramadi with 400 fighters.They were outnumbered by the IA and yet they now hold a huge territory from Syria through Iraq mainly through fear.

My point exactly, the Iraqi Army isn't a real army, the real Army is the Shiite militia.  If you want to get rid of ISIS, support them.
 
The shiite militias are funded and supported by Iran.Latley though Iran's proxies havent done well against IS.The Kurds on the other hand have done much better.A partition of Iraq and Syria is probably going to happen.
 
Link to an interview with General John Allen,USMC Retired.Walking the proverbial tightrope so as not to offend the Iraqi's and the boss in DC.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gen-john-allen-reflects-on-fall-of-ramadi/?ftag=YHF4eb9d17

The fall of Ramadi to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) happened in part because tired Iraqi forces faced off against a "pretty good" group of militant fighters, Gen. John Allen told CBS News Foreign Affairs Correspondent Margaret Brennan.

Allen, who is the presidential envoy for the coalition fighting ISIS, sat down with Brennan to talk about the state of the conflict. Last weekend, Defense Secretary Ash Carter angered some Iraqi officials when he said that their troops responsible for defending the city "showed no will to fight."
 
Really?
Iraqi military pilots in Jordan have gone on strike after their salaries were cut by 80% following an order from Defence Minister Khaled al-Obeidi and Finance Minister Hoshyar Zebari.

The 475 trainees, in Amman to receive instruction on the F-16 jets that are due to be delivered to Iraq this year. The 35 aircraft scheduled arrival has been delayed due to security concerns at Balad Air Base.

The American instructors are asking the Iraqis to sign documents confirming their unwillingness to train, which would be a serious blow to Iraqi efforts in the war against Islamic State (IS).

The Iraqi air force is currently relying on Saddam-era Sukhoi jets in its bombing campaign against IS positions in the north and west of the country.

The Russian aircraft were used in the war against Iran and the Kuwait campaign of 1991.

The striking technical trainees remain in their hotel in Amman.
 
Spencer100 said:
ISIS is get very well armed

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/06/04/isis-shows-off-us-gear-seized-from-iraqis-in-fighting-near-fallujah/

Pretty soon they will be better equipped them the CAF  >:D

It is one thing to capture equipment, and another thing to know how to use it effectively.  Not to mention resupplies of ammo, fuel and spare parts necessary to keep it operational.

As for being better equipped than the CAF, that would not be surprising, but then I refer back to previous point.
 
One interpretation of the strategic alliances and groupings forming up in the "new and improved" Middle East. In rather Kaplanesque fashion, you can actually see the groupings as being centered on geographical "redoubts" in the region:

http://pjmedia.com/blog/middle-eastern-trompe-loeil/?print=1

Trompe L’oeil Tactics Conceal the Actual Middle Eastern Strategy in Play

Posted By Avner Zarmi On June 11, 2015 @ 12:01 am In Iran,Iraq,Middle East,Syria | 4 Comments

In an unguarded moment at the G-7 summit meeting in Schloss Elmau, temporarily free of his handlers, Obama let drop what is a startling revelation only to those who have not been watching for the last two years, namely, that he does not “yet” have a strategy for dealing with the jihadi depredations of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s misbegotten “Islamic” State. However, for those who have been able to tear their eyes away from the trompe l’œïl tableau of the sputtering talks with the Iranians, the strategies of the two contending jihadi powers, the twin clusters of Sunni and Shi’i groups, are perfectly obvious.

First, it must be noted that in recent months, a tacit alliance has begun to take shape between Israel and several Muslim-majority states on Israel’s periphery. To the west, we find Egypt, profoundly rocked by the near-death experience of the so-called “Arab Spring” which brought down long-time Arab nationalist dictator Hosni Mubarrak, only to be replaced by an Ikhwanist (ikhwan, “brotherhood,” is the real name of the Sunni jihadi movement commonly called the “Muslim Brotherhood”) regime so arrogantly overreaching that it was in turn overthrown by popular revolt under the leadership of the traditional Muslim General Abdul Fattah as-Sisi. The Sisi regime has mobilized the moral force of Al-Azhar University, widely regarded as the premier Sunni Muslim institution in the world, whose rector and faculty have roundly condemned the horrific barbarity of the incipient Ikhwanist entity which calls itself so beguilingly the “Islamic State,” serially denouncing its minions’ slaughter of Christian prisoners [1] and the destruction of priceless ancient relics in Mesopotamia. [2]

On Israel’s eastern border, King Abdullah II of Jordan has quietly strengthened diplomatic ties with Israel (returning the Jordanian ambassador who had been recalled in protest over violent incidents in Jerusalem, and signing a new accord governing the strategic management of water resources and the Dead Sea), while at the same time fighting actively in what he now terms the Third World War [3] against the jihadis in the name of rescuing the traditional Muslim religion from their evil ideology [4].

To the southeast, on Jordan’s southern border, lies Saudi Arabia, increasingly alive to the danger which the Ikhwanist regime poses to King Salman’s rule (for which reason a formidable border fence [5] is being erected in the north), as well as the less imminent but no less potent danger posed by the Khomeinist variant of jihadism, centered in Iran. There have been reports of discreet contacts [6] between Israeli and Saudi diplomats in various European venues, and persistent rumors of discussions concerning possible military co-operation between them to deal with Iran.

And then, further to the east, there are the Gulf states, the UAE and Bahrain, also actively engaged in the anti-jihadi fight; the UAE in particular has squadrons of aircraft operating from forward bases in Jordan and Egypt, and is providing much-needed funding to Egypt as as-Sisi fights both a jihadi guerilla insurgency in Sinai and jihadis who have proclaimed the western Libyan city of Darna a province of al-Baghdadi’s “Islamic State,” [7] having demonstrated their fealty by beheading Coptic Christians who fell into their hands.

The “strategic kernel” generated by this tacit alliance, which in some ways evokes the forced alliance between the Western powers and the USSR in the Second World War against National Socialist Germany and her allies, is real, though not formally recognized between the parties. Each of the two rival jihadi parties threatens to encircle it and cut it off; careful consideration of a map/of the region and recent events reveals how.

The Khomeinist flavor of jihadism is based upon the Shi’ite denomination of Islam and seeks to play upon the emotions and rivalries of Shi’ite Muslims, who are largely repressed everywhere in the Muslim world but Iran. On the northern periphery of the strategic Jewish-Muslim kernel, the Iranians are trying to dominate what has been called the “Shi’ite Crescent.” They are doing this by extending their power westward across what must now be regarded as the failed colonial state of Iraq.

Never a nation-state in any western sense of the word, Iraq (the word simply means “plain,” in Arabic) was established by the British for their convenience after the Great War of 1914-18, to enable the Royal Navy to exploit the strategic oil reserves around Mosul and Kirkuk. In the wake of Obama’s retreat from the region in fulfillment of his campaign promises, the Mesopotamian region is now effectively divided into three states.

In the south, there is a Shi’ite enclave around Baghdad which has, under the pressure of the Sunni assault, effectively become a Persian “satrapy,” a wholly owned subsidiary of the Iranians. The western and central part of the region is inhabited by Arabic-speaking Sunnis, who have largely been overrun and subsumed in Baghdadi’s “state,” into whose arms they are increasingly driven by Shi’ite excesses in the fighting around Tikrit and Ramadi. And in the north, there is a  de facto ethnic Kurdish Muslim state (yes, the Kurds are as Muslim as any of their opponents) with its capital at Irbil, and which incorporates the other ethno-religious minorities of the region, such as Yazidis, Muslim Turkomans, and Chaldæan and Assyrian Christians.

The “Shi’ite crescent” would be completed by linking the satrapy of the south with the allied Assad regime in Syria and the Hizbullah-dominated parts of Lebanon.

On the southern periphery of the kernel, in recent days Shi’ite Houthi rebels have overthrown the Sunni-dominated government of Yemen, and made common cause with the Iranians, who continue to foment trouble amongst the Shi’ite minorities resident in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia (where they occupy the strategically important eastern province where nearly all the oil is), and the Gulf states.

Though primarily relying on Shi’ite factions, the Iranians have attempted to diversify. The Sunni and originally Ikhwanist organization Hamas, centered in the Gaza Strip, has increasingly come under Iranian influence (the source of many of the more sophisticated missiles [8] used in last summer’s Gaza War, as well as other weapons and supplies, was Iran), particularly since as-Sisi overthrew the Ikhwanist attempt to seize control of Egypt, and sealed the border with Gaza.

The Sunni arm of the jihadist movement, for its part, seeks to break the “Shi’ite Crescent” in the north, having occupied most of Syria and the central third of Iraq, dominated by Arabic-speaking Sunni Muslims. The forces affiliated with al-Baghdadi and a kindred jihadi organization, Jabhat an-Nusra li’ahli ash-Sham (“The Support Front of the People of Syria”), have now cut the territory still controlled by Assad in two, and are engaged in desperate fighting in the Qalamoun Mountains on the Lebanese border [9], where the Lebanese army has also been drawn in. They fight simultaneously against Assad, Hizbullah, and Iranian troops in Syria, and against Iranian-led Iraqi Shi’ites in the east (as well as against Kurds of northern Syria and Iraq). We have already noted the jihadist province allied with al-Baghdadi’s nascent, so-called “Islamic State” on Egypt’s western border; the Iranian seduction of Hamas has now given rise to a faction of disgruntled Sunnis in Gaza who have affiliated themselves with Baghdadi’s “state.” [10]

Al-Baghdadi’s “state” is the latest offshoot of the Ikhwanist al-Qa’da movement which, it will be remembered, found a home in Sunni Taliban-dominated Afghanistan. The Ikhwanist Taliban continue (taliban is a plural noun; the word talib means roughly “student”) to exert pressure on predominately Sunni Pakistan in the south, and threaten to take control there. Should they ever actually succeed in destabilizing Pakistan’s government and military, this would give the Ikhwanists nuclear weapons, to rival those whose development is the subject of the negotiations in Geneva.

Thus, we see a double attempt at enveloping, isolating, and destroying Israel and those states governed by traditional Muslims who have increasingly come alive to the danger of the evil ideologies which arose from their midst. The saving grace, if there is one, is that the two arms of jihadism are as much at war with each other as they are with Israel and traditional Muslims. Unlike the rest of world, whose gaze has been focused on the distraction going on in Washington and Geneva, you now understand the key, and can discern the hidden picture.

(Artwork created using multiple Shutterstock.com [11] images.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from PJ Media: http://pjmedia.com

URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/blog/middle-eastern-trompe-loeil/

URLs in this post:

[1] its minions’ slaughter of Christian prisoners: http://www.news.va/en/news/muslims-and-christians-in-egypt-condemn-the-killin

[2] the destruction of priceless ancient relics in Mesopotamia.: http://pjmedia.com../AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/(http:/english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2015/03/07/Azhar-slams-ISIS-for-bulldozing-Nimrud.html_.

[3] Third World War: http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/03/02/jordans-king-abdullah-ii-isis-third-world-war

[4] the traditional Muslim religion from their evil ideology: http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Jordan-to-return-ambassador-to-Tel-Aviv-citing-Israels-steps-to-ease-Temple-Mount-tensions-389723

[5] formidable border fence: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/01/15/saudi-arabia-building-massive-wall-along-border-to-keep-out-isis/)

[6] discreet contacts: https://consortiumnews.com/2015/02/04/al-qaeda-saudi-arabia-and-israel/

[7] a province of al-Baghdadi’s “Islamic State,”: http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2015/02/17/egypt-conducts-airstrikes-islamic-state-targets-libya/GK5mFg0Sl0B43cYQMvijgO/story.html

[8] the source of many of the more sophisticated missiles: http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-boasts-of-rocket-aid-to-palestinians-hezbollah/

[9] in the Qalamoun Mountains on the Lebanese border: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-lebanon-hezbollah-lebanese-army-pincer-islamic-state-jihadists-qalamoun-mountains-1505210

[10] have affiliated themselves with Baghdadi’s “state.”: http://www.debka.com/article/24652/ISIS-purloined-rockets-from-Hamas-production-lines-to-attack-Israel-Netanyahu-marks-out-wide-sterile-zone-
 
“We have given him lots of options, he just hasn’t acted on them.” pretty much sums up the situation:

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/06/08/pentagon-official-reacts-to-obamas-isis-strategy-claim-what-the-f-was-that/?print=1

Pentagon Official Reacts Angrily to Obama’s ISIS Strategy Claim: ‘What the F— Was That?’
Posted By Debra Heine On June 8, 2015 @ 6:00 pm In War

According to Fox News, a military official is taking issue with the president’s claim that he is waiting for a plan from the Pentagon to come up with a complete strategy to degrade and defeat ISIS.

On Special Report tonight, Charles Krauthammer noted that Obama occasionally stumbles on the truth, as he did when he admitted that his administration does not yet have a strategy to defeat ISIS; but as is always the case with this president it’s never his fault when something goes wrong.


“The reason is Obama’s entire strategy rests on the notion that trained Iraqis under this government are going to carry the fight to ISIS,” Krauthammer said, noting that strategy has failed in Mosul, Ramadi and Fallujah.

“This is a country that was abandoned by Obama in 2011 and threw in its lot with other players. And now we’re trying to reclaim that. It cannot be done,” Krauthammer said.

“The idea that he would now put the blame on the Pentagon for having lacked in offering him plans is exactly consistent with Obama’s method, which is to always blame others.”

One military official reacted angrily to Obama’s blamesmanship:

“What the f— was that,” the official told Fox News. “We have given him lots of options, he just hasn’t acted on them.”

Meanwhile, an overwhelming majority of the Americans agree with Obama that he has no strategy to defeat ISIS. An astounding 71% say he does not have a clear strategy, while a mere 19% say he does.


Vast majority of voters still don’t think @POTUS has a clear strategy to defeat ISIS. #SpecialReport pic.twitter.com/OZPffPj2f5

— Fox News (@FoxNews) June 8, 2015

Lt. Col Ralph Peters (Ret.) expressed his opinion why this is the case. “The reason we don’t (have a strategy) is because Obama wants the impossible.” Peters explained. “He wants to defeat the Islamic State, but he doesn’t want to hurt anyone. He doesn’t want collateral damage. He doesn’t want civilian casualties. You can’t do it! And this *clown coo-coo-land that Obama and his Paladins live in — it’s so dangerous to us all — on such a wide range of issues. But if you are unwilling to fight with no-holds-barred, with an enemy who’s going to fight with no-holds-barred, the enemy with no-holds-barred is going to get the better of you despite the technology, despite all your wealth.”

Charles Krauthammer told Bill O’Reilly Monday evening that Obama actually does have a strategy: “Just make it through to January 2017 and turn it over to the next president.”

*Correction! He said Cloud Cuckoo land.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from The PJ Tatler: http://pjmedia.com/tatler

URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/06/08/pentagon-official-reacts-to-obamas-isis-strategy-claim-what-the-f-was-that/
 
I can sell him mine

Tell Baghdad and the Shia’s your on your own now and you can control any “Shia territory” and tell Iran, “Enjoy your step child” Layoff the Sunni’s and Kurds

Designate Anabar a “Sunni territory” administered by the Tribes and backed by Saudi Arabia, who will also be Jordon’s Patron

The US backs the Kurds in the old Iraq and portions of Syria, tells them this is the best opportunity you will ever get to have a Kurdistan, so get to it. Tell Turkey, “deal with it” But we will make the Kurds police their border (along with US observers) to prevent attacks on you and not to have aims on your territory(what their own kurds do is their business). Tell the Kurds they need to make businesses deals with Turkey and are free to make business deals with Iran. The US guarantees to stick with the Kurds for 20 years, with arms, money, trade and soldiers.

Not perfect and not everyone is going to be happy, but you work with what you have. Plus if Turkey gets uppity, the US can start arming Greece.
 
More talk about returning US troops to Iraq again:

Reuters

Some U.S. troops may be needed on ground in Iraq: retiring Army chief
Wed Aug 12, 2015 6:16pm EDT

By David Alexander

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The fight against Islamic State rebels is at a stalemate and if the U.S. military does not see progress in the coming months it should consider putting support troops on the ground with Iraqi forces, Army General Ray Odierno said on Wednesday.

Odierno, the outgoing Army chief of staff, backed the current strategy against Islamic State, telling his last Pentagon news conference that while U.S. troops could defeat the militants, they could not solve the broader political and economic problems besetting Iraq and Syria.

"We could probably go in there with a certain amount of American force and ... defeat ISIL. The problem is we would be right back where we are today six months later," he told reporters, using an acronym for Islamic State.

(...SNIPPED)

Plus, the current Iraqi PM does a major government re-shuffle, but will it be enough to help kickstart his reforms?

Reuters

Iraq PM sacks cabinet officials, says reform drive under threat
Wed Aug 12, 2015 2:47pm EDT

By Ahmed Rasheed and Saif Hameed

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's prime minister dismissed his cabinet secretary on Wednesday as part of an ambitious reform drive he said was under threat from corrupt politicians and Shi'ite militia leaders who use their armed followers for political ends.

A year in office, Haider al-Abadi has launched the biggest overhaul of the political system since the end of U.S. military occupation, enacting a risky package of measures designed to enhance his own power and strip authority from political chieftains who have run Iraq since the fall of Saddam Hussein.

Lawmakers unanimously voted on Tuesday to eliminate a layer of senior government posts, scrap sectarian and party quotas for state positions, reopen corruption investigations and give Abadi power to fire regional and provincial bosses.

(...SNIPPED)
 
General Odierno did not say that US troops are needed on the ground.  He said US troops would be needed if a strike against the US were immenent, but that the solution must come from the nations and peoples of the region.

Odierno Reviews Iraq, Islamic State in Final Briefing
DefenceNews
12 Aug 2015

...

"Here's what I've learned over the last 10 years or so: There's limits to military power," Odierno said. "We can have an outcome, but again, the problem is sustainable outcomes. We've had outcomes but they've been short-term outcomes because we haven't looked at the political and economic side. You have to look at all three together, and if you don't do that, it's not going to solve the problem."

Odierno made the comments in a wide-ranging Pentagon press conference, his last before he retires this month.

Odierno did not rule out increased military action, saying the US would "have to look at putting troops on the ground" if the Islamic State planned an imminent attack on the US. Yet he said to end the Islamic State's quest to become a long-term influence in the Middle East, "you need the countries of the Middle East and those that surround the Middle East to be involved in the solution," Odierno said.


...
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/leaders/2015/08/12/odierno-reviews-iraq-islamic-state-final-briefing/31554817/
 
ISIS now using chemical weapons in Iraq?

Reuters

Kurds suspect another chemical attack by Islamic State in Iraq
Tue Sep 1, 2015 1:27pm EDT
ERBIL, Iraq (Reuters) - Kurdish authorities said on Tuesday they suspected a homemade rocket fired by Islamic State at their peshmerga forces in northern Iraq contained chemical substances, accusing the Islamist insurgents of an increasing use of chemical weapons.

The Kurdistan Region's Security Council (KRSC) said the attack had taken place along the front line north of Mosul on Aug. 31, and one peshmerga fighter was receiving treatment in hospital.

A "considerable amount" of yellow smoke was produced, it said.

Samples taken from the site of another attack earlier this year tested positive for chlorine, and at least two other incidents are being investigated.

"This is one of an increasing number of attacks in recent months suspected of carrying chemical substances," the KRSC said in a statement.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Iraq is now using its new F16s in CAS ops against ISIS!

Washington Post

Iraq has finally started using the F-16 fighter jet in combat operations
Resize Text Print Article Comments 27

By Dan Lamothe September 6 at 9:24 PM 

The Iraqi military has used the F-16 fighter jet in combat operations for the first time, more than a year after Iraqi officials began pressing Washington to deliver them to assist in the fight against Islamic State militants.

Defense officials in Iraq and Washington on Sunday confirmed the operations, which should significantly upgrade the Iraqi military’s ability to strike Islamic State militants in coming months. Iraqi Lt. Gen. Anwar Hama Amin told media outlets in Baghdad that the Iraqi military had carried out 15 airstrikes using the fighters in the past four days, striking north of the capital city in Salaheddin and Kirkuk provinces.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Even the Kurdish groups in Iraq know no refuge from Turkey's air campaign:

Reuters

Turkish jets hit Kurdish militant camps in Iraq, at least 55 killed: sources
Sat Sep 19, 2015 7:23am EDT
DIYARBAKIR, Turkey (Reuters) - At least 55 militants were killed when Turkish warplanes hit Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) camps in northern Iraq overnight, security sources said on Saturday, as Ankara shows no sign of easing up strikes on insurgents ahead of a Nov. 1 election.

The jets took off from a base in Diyarbakir, in Turkey's southeast, and later returned without damage, the sources said.

Turkey's largely Kurdish southeast has been hit by almost daily waves of deadly fighting between PKK militants and security forces since the collapse of a ceasefire in July.


(...SNIPPED)
 
Back
Top