Moon said:What is the highest mark possible?
George Wallace said:Are you really officer material? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Forces_ranks_and_insignia
Moon said:What is the highest mark possible?
Moon said:Sorry if there is a misunderstood , i meant if the score for an officier is 36 what is the highest mark possible ( /40 ,/50 or /60). One more thing, what do you mean by '' are you official material''.
One more time , i apologize for my english.
Eye In The Sky said:And you of course are speaking and advising from years of CF experience, right???
Delaney1986 said:The CF expects their Officers to have certain traits in order to be successful in their careers. One of the biggest concerns is if you have potential to be a good leader, for example. You could have all of the qualifications on paper, such as a Degree and experience, but if you don't have leadership potential than that would count against you. There are lots of qualified people out there that I would never want to be my boss.
I would imagine other traits such as assertiveness, integrity, being personable, and many more are also important to being an Officer. You have to ask yourself if you want to LEAD soldiers, to be in charge, or if you'd prefer to work under someone and take orders. You have to look at the differences in NCM work and Officer work and ensure that a more administrative approach outside of theatre or training is what you want (obviously depending on the trade). I'm sure there are MANY more qualities the CF looks for but knowing how you interact with people - if you are impatient and get easily offended maybe leading people isn't a good path for you to pursue. If you aren't good at making decisions - you constantly need others input - maybe being an Officer isn't a good fit for you. If you shy away from taking responsibility for your mistakes, etc.
The recruiting centre can help answer all your questions too about what they think makes a good Officer. Those are just my first thoughts on the question. I'm sure someone else will have some more, probably more detailed explanations.
Moon said:Merci, c'est très aimable à toi d'avoir pris le temps de me répondre. Dans les faits , c'était simplement l'expression , en tant que tel que j'avais de la misère à saisir en raison des barrières de la langue. Je comprends très bien qu'une personne n'a pas nécessairemment l'étoffe d'un leader simplement parce qu'il a des études supérieurs et qu'en aucun cas, un diplôme ne garantit de la bonne vertu et du courage d'un homme ainsi que de sa capacité à rendre les autres meilleurs. Néanmoins, le poste d'officier exige une telle formation. C'est probablement un indicateur de la rigueur, de la structure et de la discipline d'un homme. Les raisons qui m'orientent vers une carrière militaire sont reliées à mes valeurs et mes ambitions. Étant une personne qui carbure au défi et à l'aventure et qui par dessus tout veut servir son pays, j'ai rapidement compris que ma place était parmi les rangs de la grande famille des forces canadiennes. . De plus , ayant justement une nature porté vers le leadership et une facilitée a intéragir avec les autres et à prendre des décisions sous pressions, je crois avoir davantage à offrir comme officier que militaire du rang. Néanmoins, si on juge meilleur que je serve mon pays comme MR , ainsi soit-il.
I will do the traduction later , i'm a little bit hurry.
Eye In The Sky said:I'm not bristling, or even saying that some of the parts of your post aren't accurate. Your reply was fair and points out (1) that you aren't in the CF *yet* and (2) despite that, you have had exposure to the CF and have done lots of research.
That's the important stuff. Cheers!
Delaney1986 said:Bonne réponse. Pas besoin de traduire, je suis bilingue. Mais mes compétences en écriture ne sont pas très bon en français, lol
So I write in English,