• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo movie

Status
Not open for further replies.

Scoobie Newbie

Army.ca Legend
Inactive
Reaction score
1
Points
410
http://sympaticomsn.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1099662680412_95071880?hub=topstories#

Victims' families angered by new Bernardo movie
CTV.ca News Staff

A Hollywood movie about notorious killers Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo is sparking outrage, despite the producer's assurances it won't be exploitive.

Billed as "the incredible true story of Canada's most lethal couple," the movie Deadly has already been shot for the relatively low budget of less than $5 million US.

But Tim Danson, the lawyer who represented the families of victims Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, says there's no need for such a film.

"The public has what they want. They don't need anymore," Danson told CTV News. "There is nothing served at this point in time for a graphic, detailed re-presentation in Hollywood format of my clients' violation."

The film's Los Angeles-based producer, however, says the story of a couple without conscience is one that needs to be told.

"This story has a particularly compelling quality to it -- two people who were, to all intents and purposes, a happy, beautiful young couple who were able to descend into such a dark place," Quantum Entertainment's Michael Sellers told CTV, explaining that people need to understand how that can happen.

And besides, Sellers says, he's taken several steps to protect the victims and their relatives.

"The victims' family's situation is something that weighs heavily on all our minds.

"We changed all the names and we didn't have them physically resemble the victims. The actresses are over 18. We tried to show as much sensitivity as we could."

In addition, he says Deadly, which is now being edited, won't make it to Canada.

"We have no distributor in Canada, and honestly we have mixed feelings," he said. "I specifically reserved the right not to distribute in Canada. That's where it stands right now. There's still a lot of steps ahead of us."

Actress Laura Prepon, who also plays Donna on That 70s Show, will take on the role of Homolka. Misha Collins of 24 plays Bernardo.

Quantum will release the film early next year, just months before Homolka is due to be released from a maximum-security prison in Quebec.

Bernardo was declared a dangerous offender after he was convicted in the sex slayings of French and Mahaffy in 1995. He's serving a life sentence with no chance of parole.

There was a public outcry when Homolka struck a plea bargain with the authorities, cutting her sentence down to 12 years on two counts of manslaughter.

Two years ago, Danson succeeded in halting a Canadian company's plans to film their own version of the case.

 
I would go see it.....only if I get to take part in the gruesome execution afterwards of
Bernardo/Homolka.
 
This would be a feather in the cap of the actress who plays "Donna" on the 70s Show, but really, that is the only thing that would be served by this movie.

Free speech is free speech; I certainly wouldn't go see it and would hope others stay away also, but hard to judge without it being made first...

Execution would be too good for that pair.  Maybe the last half of hte movie can show the birthday parties dear Karla enjoyed while in prison, etc.
 
Disgusting.  Regardless of whether it glorifies them or not it's something else the families have to put up with.  They already lost their kids horribly and had to go through two trials plus the publicity this case had.  This is typical when the victims or victims' families are forgotten in the face of making money through movies.  I don't believe the producer when he says it weighs on his mind.  I'm all for free speech too but I would hope people would have more class then to drag this subject up again.
 
I sure hope Paul Bernardo has had to wear a dress a few times >:(
 
Both of those Purvits should have been burned at the stake!!!

My morals stop at crimes against Children,Women,Rape and abnormal sexual crimes.
I have no tolerance for said crimes. >:(
 
Karla will be released in about 9 months with a degree (in Sociology or Psychology not sure which) from Queens.
 
My bet is she's going to have to change her name, etc. or move far, far away.  Who would employ her?
 
How do we all feel as taxpayers that she was able to attain a University degree while serving her sentence!?! I believe that part of a criminals rehabilitation cannot be successfully done without educating them, since a lack of education usually eventually leads to a crime styled life. But, not for those who it cannot benefit! People like her will never change, she should have been put away for life just like Paul was. Rediculous. Bank robbers, thiefs, drug addicts. I myself believe in the power of the human spirit and thier ability to recouperate and integrate back into society if thier educated and start to feel like they BELONG to society. But... Some people will never change!

Then again it's argued once a criminal, always a criminal...

Better yet! Put all those weirdo criminals (rapists, serial murders etc) in the military as training targets!!! "Oppps, sorry Sarge! I thought I had blanks in my C-7!!!"  ;D

:warstory:
 
As i watch the news and now read this post, i admit to being somewhat puzzled.

I can understand the families objections to the movie but, Have we not all seen the movies about Ted Bundy, Jack the ripper, Charles Manson, the movie "MONSTER" ??? Are the victims of these people any less deserving of our objections ? If they were to make a movie about Robert Picton, what would the reaction be ???  I asked this question to others and the answer i got disturbed me ...."they were just hookers !!!".....but were they not someone's kids as well ???

Yes, what happened in this case is a tragedy and for that i hope that Paul Bernardo and Karla burn in hell, but are we not being somewhat hypocritical by objecting to this movie??
 
brin11 said:
My bet is she's going to have to change her name, etc. or move far, far away.  Who would employ her?

Off the top of my head...

Professional Wrestling
Celebrity Boxing promoters
Hooters (if she had the appropriate surgery)
One of those "ranches" in Nevada

Basically, anyone who could make a buck off of her.  Perhaps she'll go on TV with some teary confession, announce her religious conversion and rebirth, and start her own talk show on the CBC to compete with Dr. Phil on CTV.  When young troubled teens come on the show to admit their weaknesses, darling Tammy can get all misty eyed and tell them how much she can related, having been a rapist and murderer once.
 
Michael Dorosh said:
Basically, anyone who could make a buck off of her.    Perhaps she'll go on TV with some teary confession, announce her religious conversion and rebirth, and start her own talk show on the CBC to compete with Dr. Phil on CTV.   When young troubled teens come on the show to admit their weaknesses, darling Tammy can get all misty eyed and tell them how much she can related, having been a rapist and murderer once.

Ugk, I think I'm going to throw up.

People can talk all they want about rehabilitation, etc. but the question remains (to me, at least) is why should we?  They have committed a crime that I think deserves death.  We know, too, that she only got the sentence she did because she made a deal at the time.  I think the prosecutors regretted that decision and the public was supposedly outraged at the time that this happened.  Not outraged enough since we still have no death penalty and "life" in prison is not life at all.
 
I was at Queen's in the mid 90's, and my housemate was taking first year sociology.  They were having a nice philosophical discussion in class about prisoners having the right to university education, and most of the students seemed to be for it.  The professor then mentioned that Homolka was registered in that same class, taking it via correspondance from P4W, and the taxpayers were footing the bill.  Suddenly the arguments and the tone did an about face, and most people were rather upset that they were in the same class as her.  My housemate was rather amused at the change.  I guess prisoners have certain entitlements, as long as it's "not in my backyard..."
 
Thats the part that realy gets me !!!  All of a sudden , because it happenned here it has to be this big outrage....give me a break !
 
Quote,
Thats the part that realy gets me !!!   All of a sudden , because it happenned here it has to be this big outrage....give me a break !

If those, god forbid, were my children and you said that I'd be giving you several breaks.

I can understand the families objections to the movie but, Have we not all seen the movies about Ted Bundy, Jack the ripper, Charles Manson, the movie "MONSTER"   Are the victims of these people any less deserving of our objections

No I haven't nor would I even think about watching those movies, portraying human suffering for profit is a social weakness.

If they were to make a movie about Robert Picton, what would the reaction be  I asked this question to others and the answer i got disturbed me ...."they were just hookers !!!".....but were they not someone's kids as well
Is this outrage your feeling at that answer?   I thought you needed a break?   Anyone who answered you with that remark required an immediate shot to the mouth.
 
You do make valid points, however:

1- I have 2 kids myself but i can still take an objective look at society
2- You want to make threats, come and say it to my face
3- As for your last remark, i agree with the final part.  For the first part, it was not outrage, its was amazement at the fact that some people attach more value to one person than an other without knowing a thing about them.  My cousin disappeared, she was a hooker and drug addict.......she didn't mean any less to me for it.
 
No threats were involved here , thats what "ifs" are for.....but they were somebody's little angels.
My condolences for your cousin.

One point I will stick by is that we are responsible for movies like this being made as most will line up like lemmings and fork out thier money so more movies that should never be made will be made......like your example, unfortunetly.
Bruce
 
Bruce,

I agree with your statment on movies, beleive me !!
 
Well, the last post on this topic was on november 2004, when the movie was in production. Now, in january 2005, a lot happened with regards to Karla: she got out, she's conditions-free, and she can now fly like a bird...

I was wondering what are your positions on this movie, Karla or both... on january 20th, 2005, the day of the opening of this movie.

Let's have it....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top