• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

As Warren Kinsella says "If your explaining, your losing".

Your doing a lot of explaining on Liberal failures
Because you're tossing a lot of baseless accusations. If someone tosses slander at you or your family and you respond to it, does the act of responding mean you're losing?

Didn't think so. Context matters.
 
You can try to lecture me on this, don't, I own a business. I know the difference between paying for animal feed and making tractor payments.
Owning a (by your public admission) struggling hobby farm doesn't make you Warren Buffet.
He wants these new shiny things? OPEN UP OIL AND GAS (UNLEASH IT) FFS. What is hard to understand about that? Then we can pay our debts down a lot more, have money for social programs and ta-da build new ports, railways, ships, whatever.
UNLEASH IT

(But dont invest in the infrastructure to do so, or the military to secure it and our partnerships that secure markets)
 
Because you're tossing a lot of baseless accusations. If someone tosses slander at you or your family and you respond to it, does the act of responding mean you're losing?

Didn't think so. Context matters.
Slander at your family? Feelings hurt? Or does the truth sting?

Its up to you, but you keep defending the indefensive, thats on you. I can at least admit when something is my opinion, you appear to have a shortcoming on this.
 
Owning a (by your public admission) struggling hobby farm doesn't make you Warren Buffet.

UNLEASH IT

(But dont invest in the infrastructure to do so, or the military to secure it and our partnerships that secure markets)
This!

Thank you!

It makes no sense, zero sense, less than zero sense, to unleash anything unless you have a target market for it, and a way to get it from point A to point B.

Pumping more oil and gas only to have it sit without a market to sell it to or a way to get it there is nothing but folly.
 
Owning a (by your public admission) struggling hobby farm doesn't make you Warren Buffet.
I am not a hobby farm, I am a commercial farm. So says the government, whether you like it or not.

Do you own a business? yes or no. YOU opened the door on this. Or do you work for the government? Or work in the private sector.

UNLEASH IT
He won't.
 
If the USA wanted to trade more under fair circumstances there would be no issue.

Its the fact that they want to trade with us less, and the trade that does exist to be as lopsided in their direction as humanly possible that has sparked this consternation.

We don't get a say in how they want to act. We only have a say in how we respond.

I do not believe the trade friction is as one-sided as you make it out to be. The US has legitimate grievances so playing this up as "orange man bad" is just bad form. Canada has a lot of problems with both external and internal trade.
 
Slander at your family? Feelings hurt? Or does the truth sting?
I was talking about your family. I think you would reply to any form of slander, would you not?

But by mearly responding, you are saying it's explaining, which means you're losing.

You set up a game in which the only winning move is not to play.

Well, I reject your game and rules as they are nonsensical. If you toss baseless accusations and baseless comments, I will come here and calmly explain why I feel they are baseless. If that makes me a loser in your eyes, I don't much care. I won't change your mind. But maybe someone reads what I wrote and thinks, ya, maybe Altair has a point.
Its up to you, but you keep defending the indefensive, thats on you. I can at least admit when something is my opinion, you appear to have a shortcoming on this.
If in 2 years Carney has made zero progress, I will be there to say so.

You just want him to snap his fingers and materialize things into existence with no studies, no flying to other countries, no spending money, no planning, just poof, everything is better now.

It's unrealistic and I won't be shy in calling it out as so.
 
Do you know the difference between being a loser and losing?

"Loser" is a noun for someone who fails or loses, while "losing" is the present participle of the verb "to lose," meaning to fail to win, misplace something, or suffer deprivation. You are a loser because you are losing at something, but "loser" refers to the person, and "losing" refers to the action of not winning. "
 
I do not believe the trade friction is as one-sided as you make it out to be. The US has legitimate grievances so playing this up as "orange man bad" is just bad form. Canada has a lot of problems with both external and internal trade.
This would have a lot more weight to it if the Orange man didn't declare a trade war on the entire world*, including the Penguins.

It would also hold more weight if Orange man had one, solid, free trade deal with any country he could point to.

He signed a deal with the UK. 10-15 percent tariffs.

He signed a deal with Japan. It collapsed.

He signed a deal with Europe that Europe has zero mechanism to enforce. Trade deal is all but dead, with Trump threatening more tariffs on EU.

Signed a deal with China, 35 percent tariffs and China is absolutely brutalizing the American agricultural sector.

When someone says every nation on earth, even the Penguins, are screwing the USA, then you are left with one of two possibilities. Either the entire world is in the wrong, or the USA is right. I know where I stand.

*Except Russia , north korea and Belarus. Those guys got a pass. I wonder why.
 
Do you know the difference between being a loser and losing?

"Loser" is a noun for someone who fails or loses, while "losing" is the present participle of the verb "to lose," meaning to fail to win, misplace something, or suffer deprivation. You are a loser because you are losing at something, but "loser" refers to the person, and "losing" refers to the action of not winning. "
Semantics.

You still create a scenario where to even reply and comment on what I view as baseless is to be "losing"

Example.

Armyrick: Altair, I have evidence of you speeding. Going 100 in a 60 zone

Altair: Hey, my wife was in labour and I needed to get to the hospital

Armyrick: if you're explaining, you're losing.

Altair:....

Forgive me if I don't subscribe to that line of thinking.
 
I am not a hobby farm, I am a commercial farm. So says the government, whether you like it or not.
Meh, CRA has their definitions, then there's reality. Hobby farm, side hustle, tax management plan, mortgage subsidy scheme, labour of love, lifestyle,- if it's not covering its debt servicing obligations and properly compensating for its input labour and has no prospect of doing so in a reasonable time frame... a spade is a spade
Do you own a business? yes or no. YOU opened the door on this. Or do you work for the government? Or work in the private sector.
We've been down this road before. I work in the private sector. I'm not willing to dox myself, nor do I feel the need to float my posts with a resume.
And actually no, YOU opened the door by repeatedly trying to lean on your business ownership as an appeal to (self) authority. As I have in the past, I will give you final say as to whether we step right through it.
 
Example.

Armyrick: Altair, I have evidence of you speeding. Going 100 in a 60 zone

Altair: Hey, my wife was in labour and I needed to get to the hospital

Armyrick: if you're explaining, you're losing.

Altair:....

Forgive me if I don't subscribe to that line of thinking.
Uh oh. Looks like you're admitting guilt to stunt driving.
Also stunt driving puts other drivers at risk, and you might lose your car for 2 weeks, with a 30 day liscence suspension.

How would you drive Mrs Altair and baby Altair home from the hospital then?

Terrible example ;)
 
Uh oh. Looks like you're admitting guilt to stunt driving.
Also stunt driving puts other drivers at risk, and you might lose your car for 2 weeks, with a 30 day liscence suspension.

How would you drive Mrs Altair and baby Altair home from the hospital then?

Terrible example ;)
Sure. But the context does change the accusations, does it not? I have heard of police stopping speeders, realizing that childbirth is imminent and putting on their lights giving the car in question an escort to the hospital.

Context matters.
 
Do you ever stop to think that your dislike of the LPC may be blinding your opinion?

Answer me this. If the LPC are doing so badly, why are they not being punished in the polls? Why does Carney have some of the highest approval ratings not only in Canada, but in the western world? You don't like him, granted, but is that your view or a widespread belief?
Just a question from the sidelines Altair. The liberals have been doing badly for 10 years as many will agree. So why weren't they punished at the polls 6 years ago?
 
Just a question from the sidelines Altair. The liberals have been doing badly for 10 years as many will agree. So why weren't they punished at the polls 6 years ago?
Ineffective opposition is definitely one issue.
 
Back
Top