ArmyRick
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,493
- Points
- 1,040
NDP does it too and the Green person, ooops, Party as well. Sure.Got it. Those types of actions are only ever perpetrated by Liberal types.
Good to know

NDP does it too and the Green person, ooops, Party as well. Sure.Got it. Those types of actions are only ever perpetrated by Liberal types.
Good to know
NDP does it too and the Green person, ooops, Party as well. Sure.
This would be a great prompt for one of those artificial intelligence picture makers.rabid bed wetting
If you honestly think I don't realize ALL parties including CPC do it, shocker I realize it. The LPC take it to whole new heights.
Your words, tone, and tenor all suggest otherwiseIf you honestly think I don't realize ALL parties including CPC do it, shocker I realize it. The LPC take it to whole new heights.
So if Pierre accidently trips in public, will the same crowd here be cheering on and spreading rumours he has parkinsons?
Kamloops as an area that "traditionally had lots of jobs" was not my experience. The mid-'80s in particular were rough. Kamloops going back at least 60 years has always had about 3 major employers at the bottom of the (inverted) economic pyramid, which is why I've always thought opposition to the Ajax mine on the part of people higher up the pyramid whose frivolous employments depend on a healthy bottom layer was/is self-destructive foolishness. Every time one of those employers is shaky, local economic conditions and prospects dip. I'd guess this OK/not-OK threshold of stability is common among modest cities and towns without much diversity in the bottom layer. And, for most, that means resource extraction. Forestry, mining, fishing, agriculture, tourism - the big 5, although the order has changed since it was taught to kids in my day (and maybe I misremember the order of fishing and agriculture).OTOH, unemployment in areas that have traditionally had lots of jobs is off the charts...
E.g.,
Trudeau wasn't getting raked over the coals (he enjoyed a very high level of popularity) until he became very untenable as a PM. Then he was placed under a microscope. Now that being said, I never cared for people attacking his marriage break down, the shady accusations at West Grey academy (until there is proof, they are just rumours), etc. I personally was fed up with with promises that didn't deliver.Quid pro quo, Clarice
Liberal supports are just now obsessing over Poilievre falling the same way we Conservative supporters obsessed over Trudeau falling.
Had either Trudeau or Poilievre discovered the cure for cancer the other side would call them monsters for causing cancer researchers lose their job.
It is sometimes the case that the political opponents of an era, even a brief one, are made for each other. When one goes, the other's usefulness goes.Quid pro quo, Clarice
Liberal supports are just now obsessing over Poilievre falling the same way we Conservative supporters obsessed over Trudeau falling.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say "F**k Trudeau" flags, t-shirts & bumper stickers were out there well before the worst of Trudeau's faults were coming through.Trudeau wasn't getting raked over the coals (he enjoyed a very high level of popularity) until he became very untenable as a PM.
Bang on - #PoliticalRorschach right there.Had either Trudeau or Poilievre discovered the cure for cancer the other side would call them monsters for causing cancer researchers lose their job.
government statement on the closure, puts about 3,000 people out of workKamloops as an area that "traditionally had lots of jobs" was not my experience. The mid-'80s in particular were rough. Kamloops going back at least 60 years has always had about 3 major employers at the bottom of the (inverted) economic pyramid, which is why I've always thought opposition to the Ajax mine on the part of people higher up the pyramid whose frivolous employments depend on a healthy bottom layer was/is self-destructive foolishness. Every time one of those employers is shaky, local economic conditions and prospects dip. I'd guess this OK/not-OK threshold of stability is common among modest cities and towns without much diversity in the bottom layer. And, for most, that means resource extraction. Forestry, mining, fishing, agriculture, tourism - the big 5, although the order has changed since it was taught to kids in my day (and maybe I misremember the order of fishing and agriculture).
The TL;DR point is that impediments to expanding and sustaining that healthy bottom layer ought to be the first things removed. Removing costs - easily done in manners which maintain level playing fields - is vastly preferable to subsidization - hard to do without choosing winners and losers.

It is sometimes the case that the political opponents of an era, even a brief one, are made for each other. When one goes, the other's usefulness goes.
Kamloops as an area that "traditionally had lots of jobs" was not my experience. The mid-'80s in particular were rough. Kamloops going back at least 60 years has always had about 3 major employers at the bottom of the (inverted) economic pyramid, which is why I've always thought opposition to the Ajax mine on the part of people higher up the pyramid whose frivolous employments depend on a healthy bottom layer was/is self-destructive foolishness. Every time one of those employers is shaky, local economic conditions and prospects dip. I'd guess this OK/not-OK threshold of stability is common among modest cities and towns without much diversity in the bottom layer. And, for most, that means resource extraction. Forestry, mining, fishing, agriculture, tourism - the big 5, although the order has changed since it was taught to kids in my day (and maybe I misremember the order of fishing and agriculture).
The TL;DR point is that impediments to expanding and sustaining that healthy bottom layer ought to be the first things removed. Removing costs - easily done in manners which maintain level playing fields - is vastly preferable to subsidization - hard to do without choosing winners and losers.