Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 16,468
- Points
- 1,260
Under the Canrey government, Canada is moving forward by continuously announcing we're moving forward.
Careful comrade.

Under the Canrey government, Canada is moving forward by continuously announcing we're moving forward.
You know things are happening in the background when Smith is largely silent.Little chicken shit things eh
That part makes me laugh. A country needs a high degree of homogeneous social cohesion for that.Statement on the Canada - Sweden strategic partnership
This part raised my eye brow
I get the weird sense that you're more annoyed when the LPC does something you like than when they do something you don't like.We shall see if that comes to fruition.
Useful to put it into a broader context. I have always been frustrated by our fetish for absolute balancing a budget of ~1.5T. The pursuit of that symbolic but relatively meaning less objective can leads to unforeseen consequences. One could argue that the balancing of the multiple budgets over the last three decades has led to things like deliberate sabotage of defence spend to ensure funds are lapsed, in order to hit that arbitrary target.So- let's look at the budget that was tabled, with the benchmark PP put forward (without putting in the effort to show how he would do it). 78 Billion of crippling disaster vs. 42 billion of common sense affordability. Let's add them both to the $1.46T estimate, at the same level of rounding.
1.46 + .042 = 1.50
1.46 +.078 = ... 1.53
add another digit, we're looking at 1.502 vs 1.538.
That will be enough of your pesky facts Mister! They upend shopworn and familiar narratives.That's just not true. All extactives - not just oil and gas but mining and quarrying as well- made up 5.1% of Canada's 2023 GDP
Is the AAR an engineering challenge, or a human factors challenge?
The RCAF is creating an air to air refuelling occupation, what if we make them jump qualified, they leap out of the CC330 pulling the fuel line with themselves, land on the GlobalEye, plug in the fuel line, then, once done, unplug and hold on while the line gets reeled back.
/s
In the mid '80s we had years where public debt charges ran a little above 1/3 of revenues (GST, income taxes, etc).Has it ever been so high that we pay more in interest than we collect in GST?
High spending and indebtedness relative to revenue has happened before. It's the important controlling variables that are different this time. Interest rates peaked sometime around '81/'82 and started declining. The government flipped its operating balance from deficit to surplus between '85 and '87. Those were the two main factors leading to eventually producing a net surplus, which probably would have happened around '00/'01 if the government hadn't goosed the operating surplus by cutting spending through '96 and '97.Maybe it's nothing to worry about, has happened before, and this is just how things are sometimes. Maybe my concerns are totally unfounded. I am the first to admit I am not an economist by any means.
Basically we roll over debt - borrow new to pay off old. If lenders ever tighten up, some future generation is going to really feel it.At what point do we start to pay that debt down at all? Or do we even try?
O&G is a small piece overall, but resource extraction - agriculture and animal husbandry, forestry, fishing, mining, etc - supports everything else. As a fraction of economic activity it's collectively dwarfed by the service layer, but much of the service layer ceases to exist without the resource extraction layer. We see it happen whenever a primary employer goes under - 50 or 100 direct job losses, several times more in the total local economy.the one industry that's currently paying for a majority of our expenses as a country, not just for Alberta.
Accumulated deficit is approach $1.5T. Program spending is around $500B; revenues a little higher.Useful to put it into a broader context. I have always been frustrated by our fetish for absolute balancing a budget of ~1.5T.
I get the weird sense that you're more annoyed when the LPC does something
The RCAF is creating an air to air refuelling occupation, what if we make them jump qualified, they leap out of the CC330 pulling the fuel line with themselves,
As a rule of thumb whenever I see CAPITALIZED words like BRUTALIZED, HUMILIATED or OWNED, I assume the content creator isnt worth the bits his stuff is stored on lolFinal video I post tonight (promise), an excellent video on Canadian politics.
Hey now, influence dollars don't spend themselvesAs a rule of thumb whenever I see CAPITALIZED words like BRUTALIZED, HUMILIATED or OWNED, I assume the content creator isnt worth the bits his stuff is stored on lol
The American psyop of funding these hack youtubers and influencers has to be one of their most obvious influence campaigns yet lol.Hey now, influence dollars don't spend themselves
I think it equally likely that the bit players are paying/ have paid for training and ongoing content kits. The funding goes into planning the campaign/ generating the content/ maintaining the stable and boosting those that actually build a following.The American psyop of funding these hack youtubers and influencers has to be one of their most obvious influence campaigns yet lol.
According to Poilievre the Prime Minister promised a good deal by July 21st and to stop the tariffs. He traveled to the US and tariffs have doubled and tripled in some cases.What has the LPC done? They've announced they'll be doing things. Until anything happens it's all noise, just like the last 10 years.