• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

I get it. The CAF has manning issues all around but if we use the excuse that our current personnel situation prevents us from planning for our future personnel needs then I guess it's useless to think about modernizing our military at all.
Except we'll be retiring ships as the new ones arrive, so the crews will just transfer over.

Air force techs aren't allowed to hold quals on two different airframes, so we would be splitting up our already limited number of fighter jet techs to work two fleets.
 
Except we'll be retiring ships as the new ones arrive, so the crews will just transfer over.

Air force techs aren't allowed to hold quals on two different airframes, so we would be splitting up our already limited number of fighter jet techs to work two fleets.
That’s purely a policy that we 100% control. We can have techs maintain 2 types.
 
Except we'll be retiring ships as the new ones arrive, so the crews will just transfer over.

Air force techs aren't allowed to hold quals on two different airframes, so we would be splitting up our already limited number of fighter jet techs to work two fleets.

I am pretty sure there will be delta training for the Ops, Eng and CSE types when they convert over to RCDs and CDCs.
 
That’s purely a policy that we 100% control. We can have techs maintain 2 types.
Absolutely.

There is nothing preventing us from allowing multiple aircraft quals for both techs and aircrew.

Whether it is practical (given the available working days in a year) to be safe and proficient on multiple fleets is another matter altogether.
 
Nature is healing.


Carney says Canada upholding values but drops talk of ‘feminist foreign policy’​



JOHANNESBURG — Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada no longer has a feminist foreign policy, but still wants to uphold values on the world stage that include LGBTQ+ rights and combatting violence against women.

“Yes we have that aspect to our foreign policy. But I wouldn’t describe our foreign policy as feminist foreign policy,” Carney said at a Sunday news conference during the G20 summit in Johannesburg.

His comments illustrate a shift in rhetoric from the government of Justin Trudeau, which repeatedly called itself a feminist government. Trudeau had published a feminist foreign-aid policy, and his government declared having a feminist foreign policy, though it never published a document outlining how that operates.

As Canada seeks more trade, including with governments that don’t prioritize gender equality, Carney says it’s part of Canada’s policy to try making progress by discussing strategies and approaches toward equality.

 
I'll be honest, as someone who loathed Trudeau Libs. I like many things about Carney Libs. The Cons haven't really shown me anything to want to back them. Their leadership is non-existent and they lack an actual vision. Pollievre is a weak leader who should have resigned after the election.

I despise govt overreach, gun control, socialism, etc... but the Fed Cons haven't really shown any example of how they would do things differently/better? They would also have a bunch of religious/social wackos who would trample on rights and freedoms in the same way the Alt-Left does... the targets would just be painted on different groups.
 
I'll be honest, as someone who loathed Trudeau Libs. I like many things about Carney Libs. The Cons haven't really shown me anything to want to back them. Their leadership is non-existent and they lack an actual vision. Pollievre is a weak leader who should have resigned after the election.

I despise govt overreach, gun control, socialism, etc... but the Fed Cons haven't really shown any example of how they would do things differently/better? They would also have a bunch of religious/social wackos who would trample on rights and freedoms in the same way the Alt-Left does... the targets would just be painted on different groups.
Voting for those you dislike least is a proud Canadian tradition.
 
QB sack on the play.

And shut up Jenny Kwan... nails on a chalk board that one ;)


Liberals hoped their border bill would quickly pass. Now they're aiming for next year​

Legislation introduced last spring faces battles on multiple fronts​


One of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s first orders of business after securing a win during the spring federal election was to introduce a border security bill.

It was heralded by Liberals as a signature piece of legislation to help harden the 49th parallel and advance a trade deal with the White House.

Fast-forward five months: Trade talks have soured and the bill has gone through the wringer when it comes to public criticism, been split in two and faced further calls for amendments.

With opposition parties questioning both bills, the Liberals are looking at a battle to fufill a key election promise and get them through a minority Parliament.

“They have a disaster on their hands,” said NDP MP Jenny Kwan.

The fight comes as Canada hosts a meeting of G7 security ministers this weekend in Ottawa where border security and immigration are likely to be raised.

Here’s where things stand.

The original Strong Borders Act, Bill C-2, was introduced in June and came in response to sustained pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, who justified his trade war citing concerns about the southbound flow of migrants and fentanyl.

The legislation included measures that would update surveillance powers for security and intelligence agencies, tighten the asylum claim system and clamp down on the chemicals used to make illicit drugs.

 
I'll be honest, as someone who loathed Trudeau Libs. I like many things about Carney Libs. The Cons haven't really shown me anything to want to back them. Their leadership is non-existent and they lack an actual vision. Pollievre is a weak leader who should have resigned after the election.

I despise govt overreach, gun control, socialism, etc... but the Fed Cons haven't really shown any example of how they would do things differently/better? They would also have a bunch of religious/social wackos who would trample on rights and freedoms in the same way the Alt-Left does... the targets would just be painted on different groups.
This is the situation and position most Progressive Conservatives/Red Tory find themselves in.
 
QB sack on the play.

And shut up Jenny Kwan... nails on a chalk board that one ;)


Liberals hoped their border bill would quickly pass. Now they're aiming for next year​

Legislation introduced last spring faces battles on multiple fronts​


One of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s first orders of business after securing a win during the spring federal election was to introduce a border security bill.

It was heralded by Liberals as a signature piece of legislation to help harden the 49th parallel and advance a trade deal with the White House.

Fast-forward five months: Trade talks have soured and the bill has gone through the wringer when it comes to public criticism, been split in two and faced further calls for amendments.

With opposition parties questioning both bills, the Liberals are looking at a battle to fufill a key election promise and get them through a minority Parliament.

“They have a disaster on their hands,” said NDP MP Jenny Kwan.

The fight comes as Canada hosts a meeting of G7 security ministers this weekend in Ottawa where border security and immigration are likely to be raised.

Here’s where things stand.

The original Strong Borders Act, Bill C-2, was introduced in June and came in response to sustained pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, who justified his trade war citing concerns about the southbound flow of migrants and fentanyl.

The legislation included measures that would update surveillance powers for security and intelligence agencies, tighten the asylum claim system and clamp down on the chemicals used to make illicit drugs.

Obviously the NDP will complain, but the less comprehensive Bill C-12 should easily get Bloc / CPC support. It’s the immigration and border changes they a lot of people have been clamoring for.

This is the situation and position most Progressive Conservatives/Red Tory find themselves in.
Yup.
 
A bit of good news. The link is from MSN because there is no paywall but the article is from the National Post.

My biggest surprise in reading this was the fact that our trade with the US went from 84% of total exports in 2005 down to 76% in 2024 - so the downward trend of trade with the US and greater diversification to the rest of the world has already been ongoing over the last 20yrs. Yes its only 8% but that downward trend was already naturally occurring with no direction or intent at the Federal Government level, I expect that the trend will only increase over the next 20yrs. If the 8% was to increase by 50% to 12% that would mean that just over 60% of our trade would be with the US, at 62%.

The worst is behind us': Canada's economy is defying some of the grim forecasts about Trump's tariffs​

While the trade war has indeed caused unemployment spikes, supply chain disruptions, and a rough second quarter, in terms of growth, Canada has largely been defying the odds in some surprising areas. The question is, can it hold in 2026 and beyond?

“In terms of shock to the Canadian economy, the worst is behind us,” said Andrew DiCapua, the principal economist at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.

Canadian exports to the U.S. that are not compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) face 35 per cent tariffs. There’s a 10 per cent tariff on non-CUSMA-compliant potash and energy, a whopping 50 per cent tariff on all Canadian steel, aluminum, and copper exports to the U.S., and a 25 per cent tariff on (non-U.S. content in) cars and light trucks. Non-CUSMA-compliant auto parts face an additional 25 per cent tariff, and softwood lumber is being tariffed at around 35 per cent.

"....the Canadian Chamber of Commerce’s Business Data Lab (BDL) crunched the numbers to see which Canadian cities were the most vulnerable — looking at U.S. export intensity and dependence on America, a key export market.

Topping the list were Saint John, N.B., home to the country’s largest crude oil refinery, at a 131.1 per cent exposure rate, followed by Calgary, thanks to it being a major crude oil and natural gas exporter that also exports a lot of beef. Southwestern Ontario’s cities, including Windsor, Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo, Brantford, and Guelph, Canada’s automotive hub, came in third through sixth.

Since the projections, the hardest hit areas have proven to be concentrated in Ontario and parts of New Brunswick, reflecting their reliance on automotive manufacturing, steel, aluminum, and lumber.

“I’d say, for the most part, our emphasis on the acute difficulties in southern Ontario have been correct,” said DiCapua.

But areas like Saint John, Calgary and many other Alberta cities, which topped the BDL’s list, have been more insulated from tariffs than Southern Ontario because the energy sector has faced lower tariffs.

Karen Chapple, director of the School of Cities at the University of Toronto, said she initially feared “that this would be more of a small town story” with one-plant towns of 20,000 or so throughout Ontario bearing the brunt. But when she looked at her database, mapped out nationally, she was surprised by the level of impact on cities.


“I don’t think of Toronto as being a place where you have a lot of manufacturing,” Chapple said, “but it gets hit … not necessarily downtown, but the outskirts of the region.”

It’s similar with steel and aluminum.

“I associate steel plants with small towns, but it really hits the entire metropolitan areas of Montreal and Toronto because they’re doing so much and making so many products that involve steel or aluminum,” she added

The first three quarters saw significant manufacturing job losses amid all the uncertainty — especially concentrated in the auto corridor of Ontario. But some regions and sectors have shown remarkable resilience.

“If you take the last two months, we’ve seen some rebounding in the manufacturing sector,” said DiCapuo, noting that the country is still down 12,000 manufacturing posts since January.


Manufacturing sales saw a rebound in September, rising 3.3 per cent following August’s one per cent drop, according to Trading Economics. That is Canada’s highest growth rate since Trump announced the tariffs — with sales improving for two-thirds of the subsectors.

Also, many assumed that consumer demand would plummet this year, and while retail sales have been volatile, they’ve generally gone up. They are projected to hit $649.8 billion this year for a 2.4 per cent increase over 2024, according to IBIS World.

This, combined with a surging “return to office” trend this year, means “both retail and office have done surprisingly well this year,” said William Strange, an economics professor at the University of Toronto, noting how many Canadian employers have moved away from their remote work models, embracing more in-office schedules.

Roughly 75 per cent of Canadian exports head to the U.S., so Ottawa has been promoting trade diversification in the face of Trump’s tariffs as a way to reduce future vulnerabilities.

DiCapua pointed to progress already been made in getting Canadian products, especially oil and natural gas and some agricultural products, to other markets, particularly in Asia and Europe. “The value is still low relative to what we’ve lost to the United States, but there are some encouraging trends there,” he said.

But Canada’s heavy trade dependence on the U.S. isn’t a new problem. Back in 2005, 83.8 per cent of Canada’s exports were to the U.S., and it took a long time to trim that down to 76.4 per cent last year.

 
Back
Top