Of course she didn't read it, and if she did she wouldn't understand most of it anyway (especially if GoC lawyers had their hand in it; they obfuscate like a mofo and get offended if you ask for contracts in plain language. The remedy clause in the NSS Umbrella agreement is so poorly written the GoC lawyer that wrote it couldn't explain what it actually meant and is unenforceable.)
The remedy clauses are also impossible to enforce when every time there is an issue the contractor runs to some MP to whine they are getting picked on by the big meanies in DND and PSPC, and the PS get taken out at the knees by politicians.
Holding people accountable is fine when it's their fault, but there are so many systematic things and direct interferences in big contracts that you'd more likely to just be scapegoating someone (but doing nothing to change the system that lead to the issue).
Great that they actually want to enforce it in this case, but guessing their lawyers are way better than ours so not optimistic. But if they want that to be the norm, really need a major overhaul in how contracts are drafted, and who actually has veto on it. Far too many times other departments have clauses that can absolutely write off a contract, or massively increase costs, when they have zero responsibility for the costs, schedule etc.