• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

Meanwhile, minority governments are everywhere... we'd better get used to them:

Adapting to minority governments: Canada’s new normal​

Stability will not come from increasingly unlikely majorities, but from institutions capable of functioning with fragmented power.

For the past quarter-century, federal elections in Canada have more often resulted in minority governments than majorities. Far from being an electoral anomaly, this trend has led to a lasting transformation of the country’s partisan politics. However, our parties and institutions continue to function as if majority governments remain the order of the day.

The 2025 federal campaign at first seemed like a perfect storm of factors for the creation of a majority government. The contest came down to which of the two major parties, the Liberal Party of Canada (LPC) or the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC), voters found most capable of responding to the crises of the moment. Together, the two parties received a combined 85 per cent of the popular vote, a sum not seen since Diefenbaker’s landslide in 1958.

And yet, Canadians woke up to a third consecutive Liberal minority government the day after the April 28 election. This result stood in sharp contrast to the seat projections of popular sites like Canada 338 or CBC/Radio-Canada’s Poll Tracker, which showed the Liberals comfortably in majority territory.

This outcome, far from being surprising, is rather part of a trend that began at the turn of the millennium. Between 1945 and 1997, two-thirds of elections resulted in majority governments. Since 2000, the proportion has reversed: two-thirds of federal elections now result in minority governments.

Increasingly fragile majorities​

Moreover, the majority governments formed since the early 2000s are clearly more fragile in their parliamentary position. From 1945 to 1997, majority governments had, on average, about 12 per cent more seats than the threshold required for a majority in the House of Commons. Since 2000, majority governments have averaged only about five per cent above this threshold.



 
Rona is quite busy in post political life, look it up, lots going on. And she has never indicated any interest in coming back.
Too bad. I know a lot of people online and IRL who’d be happy to see her give it a go against Team Red.
It wouldn't matter who was in charge of the CPC, the CBC and MSM along with the hard left, will exercise any and all efforts of character assassination on the CPC leader.
Except for those 2-3 of years where Team Blue was way ahead in all sorts of polling between when PP took over as Blue’s coach and JT GTFO’ed? ;)
 
Last edited:

“It seems to put in place a framework for significantly more oil production and natural gas in Alberta,” the ambassador said.

“We expect that as that moves forward, that some of that oil, most likely will be shipped to the United States.”
I don't think the yanks understand the raison d'etre behind a pipeline to the coast...
 


I don't think the yanks understand the raison d'etre behind a pipeline to the coast...
Wait, so now they want and expect more of the exact category of exports that pushes what would otherwise be a trade deficit into being a trade surplus, and that they got all pissy about?

These friggin’ people.
 
Wait, so now they want and expect more of the exact category of exports that pushes what would otherwise be a trade deficit into being a trade surplus, and that they got all pissy about?

These friggin’ people.
Exports that that have put tariffs on...and by using the port to ship it via tanker when we could export it via rail and pipeline...

Nothing they do or say makes a lick of sense.

This pipeline is for the Asian market. And Hawaii doesn't count.
 
Wait, so now they want and expect more of the exact category of exports that pushes what would otherwise be a trade deficit into being a trade surplus, and that they got all pissy about?

These friggin’ people.
Thought they didn’t need anything from us.

I can’t see any real repair of the relationship with those people for at least a generation.
 
A little something from the bought-and-paid-for, in-the-bag-for-Team-Red media ;)
Also archived here.

From the piece:
1765290759874.png

More details in the attached bit from the Big Honkin' Budget Implementation Bill.

Just like the notwithstanding clause, I'm SURE everyone thinks this sort of thing will only be used in the most extreme, limited cases.
 

Attachments

Thought they didn’t need anything from us.

I can’t see any real repair of the relationship with those people for at least a generation.
The real issue is that as anyone over the age of 40yrs continues to age out, the vast majority of the younger Americans coming up into the ranks of the US Civil Service, Government, etc, will have less of a 'historical' understanding of how things were done previously. They will have virtually no understanding of what the relationship was from the end of WWII through the 1990's into the early 2000's. Their world will be based on Trump's view of the world from 2015/16 onwards towards the end of 2029/29. That's 12+yrs of mocking Canada, of mocking the Europeans, of constantly hearing that America doesn't need anything they have and those roots will have taken control and will grow and spread.

Unless the next President of 2028 comes along and 'promotes' Canada (and Europe), pays respect to who our PM is (and that PM doesn't fuck it up as well), visits Canada often, cultivates ties again - with respecting cultural differences - and throws us some legitimate preferential treatment, things are not at all going back to the way they were 15-20yrs ago. That ship has sailed. AND, it does cut both ways. If the Americans elect someone in 2028/29 someone who is conciliatory towards us (and the rest of Europe) and does and says the right thing, its imperative that whoever is our PM says and does similar things. They cannot pretend to hold the higher moral ground.
 
Unless the next President of 2028 comes along and 'promotes' Canada (and Europe), pays respect to who our PM is (and that PM doesn't fuck it up as well), visits Canada often, cultivates ties again - with respecting cultural differences - and throws us some legitimate preferential treatment, things are not at all going back to the way they were 15-20yrs ago. That ship has sailed. AND, it does cut both ways. If the Americans elect someone in 2028/29 someone who is conciliatory towards us (and the rest of Europe) and does and says the right thing, its imperative that whoever is our PM says and does similar things. They cannot pretend to hold the higher moral ground.
You're assuming Trump isn't successful in finding a way to run for a third term and wins.
 
The real issue is that as anyone over the age of 40yrs continues to age out, the vast majority of the younger Americans coming up into the ranks of the US Civil Service, Government, etc, will have less of a 'historical' understanding of how things were done previously. They will have virtually no understanding of what the relationship was from the end of WWII through the 1990's into the early 2000's. Their world will be based on Trump's view of the world from 2015/16 onwards towards the end of 2029/29. That's 12+yrs of mocking Canada, of mocking the Europeans, of constantly hearing that America doesn't need anything they have and those roots will have taken control and will grow and spread.

Unless the next President of 2028 comes along and 'promotes' Canada (and Europe), pays respect to who our PM is (and that PM doesn't fuck it up as well), visits Canada often, cultivates ties again - with respecting cultural differences - and throws us some legitimate preferential treatment, things are not at all going back to the way they were 15-20yrs ago. That ship has sailed. AND, it does cut both ways. If the Americans elect someone in 2028/29 someone who is conciliatory towards us (and the rest of Europe) and does and says the right thing, its imperative that whoever is our PM says and does similar things. They cannot pretend to hold the higher moral ground.

Fairly certain many of the US's allies have constantly mocked or criticized the US over the many years while at the same time almost totally relying on the US to lead and fund the free world...

"promotes"... "pays respect"... "preferential treatment"... all of these things can happen provided it is earned and a two-way street. The times when all those things came for free (which is what Canada is used to all the while emphasizing this disdain for the US) are over no matter who is in the white house.

What grates on the entitled masses of mostly left leaning people in this country is that all of that needs to now be earned. How dare the US not promote, respect, nor give preferential treatment to Canada (as we rely entirely on them for our economic and military survival).

The situation has changed. Time for everyone else to adapt. Choose the path carefully, but I doubt any other country has better intentions for us than the US does.
 
Back
Top