- Reaction score
- 8,418
- Points
- 1,260
And having ex-PM’s run from the bosom of Sophie to the bosom of Katy certainly doesn’t help us.
Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???
- Thread starter Altair
- Start date
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 20,174
- Points
- 1,260
As much as I despise the two of them, I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. And the faster Canada pulls away from the decade of darkness he created, and him, the better.
Don't say his name three times.
- Reaction score
- 8,418
- Points
- 1,260
Its was merely an example of a CDN running from one set of bosom's to another, lol.
MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 8,255
- Points
- 1,210
Point 2 was about the lab, which releasing that information without damaging national security or interest would be walking a very fine line.
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 20,174
- Points
- 1,260
I think that line can often be abused under the disguise of national security when in reality its to protect politically aligned pers or a party itself.
- Reaction score
- 13,239
- Points
- 1,160
Releasing the info now would make our new allies look bad. That could harm future trade deals which means its a matter of national security to let them get away with it.
MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 8,255
- Points
- 1,210
One trade deal makes us allies? Many people seem to jump to thr assumption that this trade deal puts us in bed with china. They are the 2nd largest economy in the world, we cant just not trade with them. What matters is the safe guards we put i place to protect our selves. The same goes for any other country.
- Reaction score
- 7,688
- Points
- 1,260
That was disingenuous my friend....
China is, and always will be an adversary / competitor....but that does not mean that we can't and shouldn't sell them stuff
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 47,739
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 6,842
- Points
- 1,260
I guess what I want to know is what is a “strategic partnership” and why are we in one with two of the most odious regimes in the world?
People who are smarter than me who get paid more than me to think about national security are very concerned.
- Reaction score
- 13,239
- Points
- 1,160
I have zero heartache against buying and selling stuff to China. I think Canadians deserve to know which Members of Parliament were secretly working with the CCP, and I suspect not wanting to upset China is one of the excuses our government uses to not hold them accountable. Ends justify the means stuff. It's not my tea.
- Reaction score
- 7,688
- Points
- 1,260
Got it. I too would like to see names named.
- Reaction score
- 13,239
- Points
- 1,160
I never said don't trade with China. I said trading with China is an excuse to not name their agents.
- Reaction score
- 8,483
- Points
- 1,360
Michelle Rempel Garner on "the speech" (also archived here) ....
nationalpost.com
... with this bit standing out for me as at least suggesting that PP will likely continue more down the opposing path than trying-to-help-where-he-can-support-it path:
As a reminder, this from PP as of May of last year:
globalnews.ca
More on "where next for Team Blue?" from the National Post.
ca.news.yahoo.com
Michelle Rempel Garner: Nice speech Carney, but what are you going to do about it?
Words mean little if they are not followed up with action
nationalpost.com
As a reminder, this from PP as of May of last year:
Poilievre vows to work with Carney on U.S. deal ahead of Parliament return - National | Globalnews.ca
In addresses to their caucuses Sunday, Prime Minister Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre focused, in part, on the importance of securing a deal with the U.S.
globalnews.ca
More on "where next for Team Blue?" from the National Post.
After Carney's Davos speech, Conservatives ponder how Poilievre can meet the foreign policy moment
'I think confronting that reality that (Trump's) not just going to go away, it's unpleasant, and it's less than ideal, but I think it is reality,' said Woodfinden
- Reaction score
- 3,087
- Points
- 1,140
When was the last time a Canadian PM went to a international get together and delivered a speech being talked about around the world?
- Reaction score
- 12,167
- Points
- 1,040
Poilievre is going to first have to learn the difference between constructive criticism and fly-shit-in-pepper-gotcha. Then he's going to have to apply it remorsely, never yielding to the temptation to revert to the latter.
- Reaction score
- 7,688
- Points
- 1,260
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 12,658
- Points
- 1,360
They can buy all the coal, potash, minerals, grain and oil we can sell them aa far as I'm concerned.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 4,175
- Points
- 1,040
We still need to make sure we diversify. China will weld those ties as weapons when needed to decimate our industries.
Can’t put all our eggs in one basket, the US is showing us that.
- Reaction score
- 7,688
- Points
- 1,260
We are a trading nation....with many baskets.
Last edited:
Similar threads
