• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???

I am not sure what more the CPC needs to be told to get them (us) to realize they need a leadership change.
With still 3-ish years before an election is due I'm not sure of it makes sence to swap in a new leader now? The new leader vibes will mellow out by the election. Right now any new CPC leader will be made out to be pro-Trump somehow by the LPC and it will hang over their head their whole time. Might be wise to wait and see who replaces Trump to take that easy button away from the LPC.
 
With still 3-ish years before an election is due I'm not sure of it makes sence to swap in a new leader now? The new leader vibes will mellow out by the election. Right now any new CPC leader will be made out to be pro-Trump somehow by the LPC and it will hang over their head their whole time. Might be wise to wait and see who replaces Trump to take that easy button away from the LPC.

I'd argue that's 3 years for Canadians to get to know the leader, and allow ample time to completely dispel such notions well ahead of the election all while Trump is still in office.
 
I am not sure what more the CPC needs to be told to get them (us) to realize they need a leadership change.

PMMC and LPC are essentially running a CPC Gov. Minus firearms, which they don't seem to have public backing on.

I guess the trouble is who else is there ?
Does there have to be?
 
With still 3-ish years before an election is due I'm not sure of it makes sence to swap in a new leader now? The new leader vibes will mellow out by the election. Right now any new CPC leader will be made out to be pro-Trump somehow by the LPC and it will hang over their head their whole time. Might be wise to wait and see who replaces Trump to take that easy button away from the LPC.
It’s a leadership review. If, in the wake of it, Poilievre makes an exit, they would choose an interim for some span of time, get their poop in a group, and then hold a leadership race. Could easily be a year before they chose a permanent leader. As soon as they did so they’d be looking to ramp up to election if they can succeed in triggering one.
 
It’s a leadership review. If, in the wake of it, Poilievre makes an exit, they would choose an interim for some span of time, get their poop in a group, and then hold a leadership race. Could easily be a year before they chose a permanent leader. As soon as they did so they’d be looking to ramp up to election if they can succeed in triggering one.

He seems to be a committed father and husband. He's done 20 years in parliament, and he's done some stuff. Now he's taking a beating, I'm sure he has connections to get a good job. I really wouldn't be surprised if he does walk. But hubris is a hell of a drug.
 
He seems to be a committed father and husband. He's done 20 years in parliament, and he's done some stuff. Now he's taking a beating, I'm sure he has connections to get a good job. I really wouldn't be surprised if he does walk. But hubris is a hell of a drug.
Why not walk after losing in Chareton?

I feel he's more of a Scheer than O'Toole.
 
3%? Not a bad deal, but something tells me the koreas are eexpecting big sales increases.

3% would likely pay back the facility and then some in 10 years.

Algoma is in a unique position where once that second arc furnace is running unless the States opens up for business again, they will have a excess capacity in the 2-2.6m tons of steel due to limited products and lack of alternate sales partners.
 
Back
Top