• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 37876
  • Start date Start date
Having seen the quality of a lot of born in Canada Canadians with generations of Canadian roots, it’s not a status I’m gonna put on a pedestal.

As one of those born in Canada Canadians with generations of Canadian roots, I agree!

Cletus The Slack-Jawed Yokel Illustration GIF by Juta Studio
 
Did your wife's parents come to Canada just to calve their daughter in order to secure a passport ?

No, as I mentioned she was already a toddler when they got here. I think they were just looking for a less shitty place to be Algerian than France where they were before. Give her (and later her Canadian-born brothers) a better future and all that.

Even the MacDonald Laurier institute’s most aggressive estimates in the link you provided are something on the order of 2500-3000 kids born to so-called ‘birth tourists’ per year. That’s a rounding error in immigration or birth statistics. As policy problems go that’s a very minor one.

Having a kid in Canada doesn’t mean you yourself get an immigration status you didn’t previously have. Citizenship attaches to the person born here, not the non-resident parent(s). Non-residents are not exempt from removal just because they’ve had a child here who is a citizen.

If someone is born in Canada, grows up in Canada, goes to school and eventually works in Canada, I don’t know what else to call them but “Canadian”.
 
No, as I mentioned she was already a toddler when they got here. I think they were just looking for a less shitty place to be Algerian than France where they were before. Give her (and later her Canadian-born brothers) a better future and all that.

Even the MacDonald Laurier institute’s most aggressive estimates in the link you provided are something on the order of 2500-3000 kids born to so-called ‘birth tourists’ per year. That’s a rounding error in immigration or birth statistics. As policy problems go that’s a very minor one.

Having a kid in Canada doesn’t mean you yourself get an immigration status you didn’t previously have. Citizenship attaches to the person born here, not the non-resident parent(s). Non-residents are not exempt from removal just because they’ve had a child here who is a citizen.

If someone is born in Canada, grows up in Canada, goes to school and eventually works in Canada, I don’t know what else to call them but “Canadian”.

We can dicker over the value of the stats but I will just write that off as our biases coming into collision, again.

Other than that I take no issue with your post. And you're correct. But thank you for the lesson anyways professor.
 
We can dicker over the value of the stats but I will just write that off as our biases coming into collision, again.

Other than that I take no issue with your post. And you're correct. But thank you for the lesson anyways professor.
You’re welcome. I’ll try to have grades up by the week before finals.
 
When my mom immigrated from Scotland in 1919 there was no such thing as Canadian citizenship - we were all British subject until 1947. She became a Canadian citizen by default in 1947, so I guess I'm legit.

My step-mom came over as a warbride and had to apply for her Canadian citizenship sometime in the 1970s.
 
Back
Top