Halifax Tar
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 12,743
- Points
- 1,260
Crazy how that is eh ?
LPC leadership race - 2025
- Thread starter dimsum
- Start date
Crazy how that is eh ?
- Reaction score
- 2,630
- Points
- 1,190
We really need to start a Canadian Libertarian party for you.
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 12,743
- Points
- 1,260
- Reaction score
- 2,630
- Points
- 1,190
Hmmm no candidates in HRM. You should take up the flag!
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 12,743
- Points
- 1,260
Maybe when I retire. Who knows ?
I would lean more towards municipal government though.
- Reaction score
- 2,630
- Points
- 1,190
I'll sign your nomination papers.
- Reaction score
- 6,758
- Points
- 1,160
Whichever of those two wins, they then have to put their money where their mouth is. I’m doubtful that would happen, but it’s up to them to come up with some concrete positive policies, not just promises to take away bad policies.
I’ll wait to see if either addresses the O&G-to-Tidewater issue…
Only till the election.
Then liberals forget their promises or just change them.
- Reaction score
- 6,758
- Points
- 1,160
I find it extremely strange that Carney is willing, if he wins, to serve as PM for just a couple of months, or maybe til Oct, but I don't think Singh can back them that long without committing political suicide.
I find it hard to believe he is also willing to spend 4 years as the leader sitting over in the corner with almost zero chance to talk, depending on their seat numbers.
Perhaps someone can tell me why Carney would want to pursue those two points. Especially with his autocratic demeanor and his zealot like singular focus on Net Zero. So, why is he willing to subject himself to that? Being leader of the wilderness party, likely doesn't carry much weight on the world stage.
Another thought occurs. Perhaps it has something to do with maybe influencing the House through a stacked Senate? IDK.
Edit - Two election campaigns back to back are expensive and extremely tiresome for the electorate
I find it hard to believe he is also willing to spend 4 years as the leader sitting over in the corner with almost zero chance to talk, depending on their seat numbers.
Perhaps someone can tell me why Carney would want to pursue those two points. Especially with his autocratic demeanor and his zealot like singular focus on Net Zero. So, why is he willing to subject himself to that? Being leader of the wilderness party, likely doesn't carry much weight on the world stage.
Another thought occurs. Perhaps it has something to do with maybe influencing the House through a stacked Senate? IDK.
Edit - Two election campaigns back to back are expensive and extremely tiresome for the electorate
Last edited:
QV
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,618
- Points
- 1,010
Because they will squeeze another year out of it. We won’t see an election until 2026. Plenty of time to completely destroy the O&G sector with NDP support.
And how does he do that?
- Reaction score
- 6,758
- Points
- 1,160
But that's been argued against with possible evidence of truth. How do you think he can extend his mandate past October 25? This of course assumes he defeats every non confidence vote until then. Singh be damned.
I'd like to see some of the ones of the view it can't be done take a stab at my questions at post #528. I'm not arguing any points, just wondering if people have an opinion.
- Reaction score
- 6,758
- Points
- 1,160
More Net Zero wisdom from Carney. Don't forget these are the companies he will reward or punish, depending how they follow his orders.
