• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Maritime Coastal Defence Vessels (MCDVs)

First, let's all get the lingo right, it's Shelburne (no o).

And partial yes: Cormorant was remediated there, I don't think Fraser was, in fact, I don't think the facilities could take a ship the size of Fraser.
No, Cormorant was recycled in Sheet Harbour by RJ MacIsaac Construction Ltd.
549786476_1246740380814035_8586966719965415761_n.jpg
 
Shelbourne. Wasn’t that where Fraser and Cormorant ended up before they got towed to the razor blade yard?

Bridgewater was their last home.

Some jackass bought Fraser to make her into a casino. It failed of course and they finally towed her up the St Lawrence to cut her up.

She was the former local rugby club's clubhouse for a season or two.
 
I am going to indulge my predilection for toys this morning.

These are cheap solutions available today that can be deployed from and with any existing vessel, naval or commercial, large or small.


First is the Manta - an autonomous Bras d'Or that can submerge.
Like the Bras d'Or it rides fast over the waves on its wings, it can survive in high sea states with its wings supplying stability, it can loiter on the surface in drlft mode and it can sprint away from threats and towards new locations or targets.
Unlike the Bras d'Or it can also loiter and navigate submerged.

It comes in lengths ranging from 18 ft to 54 ft. The 54 ft Manta has a payload bay with a 5000 kg capacity. The 18 ft has a payload of 50 kg.
As a reminder a Mk48 torpedo and a Tomahawk missile weigh around 1600 kg, so three per 54 footer.
Kratos builds a 90 kg cruise missile with a 926 km range and a 36 kg warhead


.....


Next is the V-Bat UAV, a VTOL tail-sitter that can take off and land on any surface and that has all the range and endurance benefits of a fixed wing aircraft. Unlike a copter it can glide and reduce fuel consumption.

....


And finally the Canadian BAE Herne XLAUV

....

These are the places where money should be spent today.
 
An Aussie Air Marshall looks at the Canadian and Australian sub programs to parse why they came to the decisions they did.

 
Further to the info on the Cellula Robotics BAE Herne

A sister product developed with the DRDC.

The hydrogen fuel cell powered Envoy

 
SAAB proposing a GRP version of the Kingstons.

Same crew and similar weaponry but a bit longer and faster.


Intended to be used in a mined environment because it is estimated that the entire Baltic is potentially mined therefore there are no safe waters from which to deploy stand off systems.

But there are lots of islands .... do they need ships?
Would uncrewed boats controlled from shore suffice?

...

WRT GRP hulls: does that open up 3D printing opportunities, faster and cheaper production?
 
SAAB proposing a GRP version of the Kingstons.

Same crew and similar weaponry but a bit longer and faster.


Intended to be used in a mined environment because it is estimated that the entire Baltic is potentially mined therefore there are no safe waters from which to deploy stand off systems.

But there are lots of islands .... do they need ships?
Would uncrewed boats controlled from shore suffice?

...

WRT GRP hulls: does that open up 3D printing opportunities, faster and cheaper production?
It's far more heavily armed in practice than an MCDV. The 40mm gun they are talking about has a fire control radar, and the ship is designed to take torpedoes and light SAMs for C-UAS.

As for the MCM mission, the ship is designed to be able to do it, but it's not limited to just that task, as made clear by the potential armament and the choice of a higher speed, but less quiet, propulsion system.
 
It's far more heavily armed in practice than an MCDV. The 40mm gun they are talking about has a fire control radar, and the ship is designed to take torpedoes and light SAMs for C-UAS.

As for the MCM mission, the ship is designed to be able to do it, but it's not limited to just that task, as made clear by the potential armament and the choice of a higher speed, but less quiet, propulsion system.

All true. But closer to a Kingston than a Halifax II, hence my description.
 
Back
Top