• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Milnet.ca Routine Orders - Discussion

User Registrations 454
Accepted Terms & Conditions 387

Does that means that on the new users, some didn't accepted the guidelines ?
 
That shows how many unique IP addresses visited the site last month. It's not exactly unique visitors as a single IP (such as one of the DWAN IPs) can hide a lot of people.
 
Citation de: Yrys le Aujourd'hui à 14:40:04
Does that means that on the new users, some didn't accepted the guidelines ?

Mike Bobbitt said:
It would seem so!

User Registrations  454
Accepted Terms & Conditions  387  = 67 people didn't accept the guidelines ...


No wonder there is trolls around here  ;D

>:D
 
It's currently a post-condition of registering. Once you've activated your account you'll be shown the T&C page until you accept it. After that you get normal access. These numbers seem to indicate that 67 people didn't make it past that stage!
 
Mike Bobbitt said:
These numbers seem to indicate that 67 people didn't make it past that stage!

I'm not sure, now thinking a bit, that we can get a clear picture on that until we have a few "Milnet.ca Routine Orders".
Some may have activated an acount in the last few days without accepting the guides lines, so are in the "process of" .

There is nothing to say that those 67 activate an acount in March ... or not. Numbers for a trimester could get a better estimated.
There could get a month were the numbers are reversed ... or worst  :-X !

(I'm not sure I have  Clarity in those sentences ...
 
Yrys said:
Does that means that on the new users, some didn't accepted the guidelines ?

User Registrations   454
Accepted Terms & Conditions   387  = 67 people didn't accept the guidelines ...

Actually, I'll step in here because while most people sleep soundly at night, there's some insomniacs about who go through and kill (ie ensure some "registrants" can never activate) some "New Registrants" who are obviously spammmers etc.

This "67" figure of yours could also entail those who've registered, but have just not yet "clicked" on the link in their email to activate yet & ergo have not yet accepted the terms and conditions.

The Domanitrix
(OHhhh...and I see there is another "Vern" activating his/her account right now!!) <--- I doth protest; unless of course it is my cohort in crime from CHAR FM and fellow radio announcer. If so, you'd better all get ready for the real show to begin because I won't have to be so shy anymore!!   >:D


Edited: Nope. Different Vern.  :(
(I have a feeling it's going to get confusing around here!! I hope they get all my nasty PMs!!  ;D) I'll have to remain shy I guess.  :-[
 
Shamrock said:
How was usage during Earth Hour/Hug an Iceburg Day?

That'd be hard to tell ... Earth Hour occured at different times accross the nation ... and there's some overseas folks here too.

Here's some stats from the week though. I've bolded the Friday before as well (23rd):


Date                      New Topics    New Posts    New Members    Most Online      Page Views
2008-03-22            26                      383                13                          1075                  91581
2008-03-23            21                  387              15                    1106              93842
2008-03-24            22                  532                7                    1187              112374
2008-03-25            22                  525              16                    1242              114716
2008-03-26            28                  487              12                    1081              115203
2008-03-27            16                  380              16                      913              98334
2008-03-28            24                  410              20                    1022              105810
2008-03-29            17                      291                  10                          1057                  99540
2008-03-30            15                  319              11                    1169              106344
2008-03-31            23                  578              14                    1238              127504
 
ArmyVern said:
This "67" figure of yours could also entail those who've registered, but have just not yet "clicked" on the link in their email to activate yet & ergo have not yet accepted the terms and conditions.

I think I may be one of them actually.  I am pretty sure that in the last year or so I tried to register through under the nickname hellpup.  But for one reason or another it didn't get through.  I thought that it was a DIN computer problem, tried again a long time later and couldn't use that "hellpup" nickname.  So I dropped an L and voila!  Never thought to ask when I was getting my logg in if there was a chance of getting my normal nick back.
 
helpup said:
I think I may be one of them actually.  I am pretty sure that in the last year or so I tried to register through under the nickname hellpup.  But for one reason or another it didn't get through.  I thought that it was a DIN computer problem, tried again a long time later and couldn't use that "hellpup" nickname.  So I dropped an L and voila!  Never thought to ask when I was getting my logg in if there was a chance of getting my normal nick back.

Nope. Nothing found under "Hellpup". It's probably long gone if it were never activated. Those stats Mike's got below are just from March 08.

Another thing for that "67" figure ... some of those registrations occured just yeasterday/last night (31 Mar 08) -- I have a feeling some of them will be activating today when they log in to their home emails and get the site "activation" link.
 
Helpup, some words are barred from being used in an account name... Hell is one of those. :)
 
Mike Bobbitt said:
Helpup, some words are barred from being used in an account name... Hell is one of those. :)

Thanks Mike, that entered my mind as well, although I don't normally have a problem with hellpup as a Nick on any of the past sites I have been to.  No biggie though, it is a Army nickname that I picked up way back when, but I do understand why sites do want to restrict the in-bedding of certain word combo's.
 
Interesting facts... didnt realize so many people got banned.  Is that because most of them get 'banned' before they even start posting? (i.e. known trollers, double accounters, etc...)
 
If you're talking about the "Banned User Blocked Actions" (142 last month) this figure is actually the number of times a user who has been banned tried to do something here (view a page, reply, check PMs etc.)

It could represent 142 users trying one action, or one banned user connecting 142 times. Most often people try 2-3 times and that's it, some are more persistent. We've seen some banned users literally try daily for weeks to get back in.


Cheers
Mike
 
Mike Bobbitt said:
We've seen some banned users literally try daily for weeks to get back in.

Some of them try over a dozen times daily  ::)
 
Back
Top