- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 160
Probum's point is an interesting one.
On one level Jack Layton is a product of Toronto civic politics, one of the most dysfunctional implementations of democracy on the planet.
On another level he is a smart guy, is he pandering to his core constituency with such polemics?
Or does he know he'll never be PM and is betting on another gov't where he can appear to have held the 'hammer' and influenced the government on this or a related issue?
Could he morph the "complete withdrawal now" shrill now to more CIDA money in the future and come out looking the winner?
Has he already thought this through ?, realized that the battle will be won, decided to bypass the 'nasty war' part of the debate and go right to the palatable part. Of course once the situation on the ground actually gets to the palatable "passing out teddy bears" part, (in the near future), he can claim that was his idea all along.....
On one level Jack Layton is a product of Toronto civic politics, one of the most dysfunctional implementations of democracy on the planet.
On another level he is a smart guy, is he pandering to his core constituency with such polemics?
Or does he know he'll never be PM and is betting on another gov't where he can appear to have held the 'hammer' and influenced the government on this or a related issue?
Could he morph the "complete withdrawal now" shrill now to more CIDA money in the future and come out looking the winner?
Has he already thought this through ?, realized that the battle will be won, decided to bypass the 'nasty war' part of the debate and go right to the palatable part. Of course once the situation on the ground actually gets to the palatable "passing out teddy bears" part, (in the near future), he can claim that was his idea all along.....