• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

New Canadian Shipbuilding Strategy

  • Thread starter Thread starter GAP
  • Start date Start date
I just did a quick look at Argentia via Google Earth……the bones are there plus Placentia is right next door so it looks quite doable with a big infrastructure update. I don’t know what the winter ice situation is like though.
So where do the families live? Work? Shop? Go to school? Etc?
 
Unlike Prince Rupert ;)

why not Port Hardy? Shorter trip to Vancouver than Port Rubert is. On the other hand, there is the problem of providing a life for the sailor's family other than standing on the pier and waving goodbye for six months. Find a place for the family to live and then locate the boats nearby. Would the current facilities in Esquimalt be adequete for servicing if you weren't trying to tie six boats up there at the same time?
 
According to Wiki, the Town of Placentia (which includes Argentia) has a population of about 3300 so, not much. An hour and a half from St. John's.
How many folks do you think we add to that? 50% 35% 65%? If a base was dropped in there.
 
Let's say a total of 400 seagoing personnel, an equivalent number of shore-based CAF members, the same in PS support, each with an average of 1.5 spouse/dependents; that's 1800 more people in the community.

Plus growth in the civic infrastructure and general support (stores etc).
 
Let's say a total of 400 seagoing personnel, an equivalent number of shore-based CAF members, the same in PS support, each with an average of 1.5 spouse/dependents; that's 1800 more people in the community.

Plus growth in the civic infrastructure and general support (stores etc).
So about 5K population with everything up and running. Not huge, and we all know how quickly public infrastructure like hospitals and schools respond to population growth.
 
So about 5K population with everything up and running. Not huge, and we all know how quickly public infrastructure like hospitals and schools respond to population growth.
If they chose anew facility on the West Coast, I’m again out in a limb and will say that we would put it close to the new and future LNG facilities and possible crude oil facility. Glancing at a map, not sure what’s up there that could accept approx 2,000+ new souls easily.
On the EC, if it’s a new facility, Sydney is large enough absorb this many people and would be a welcomed addition I’m sure.
 
Back
Top