• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Nine liner

jeffb

Sr. Member
Subscriber
Mentor
Reaction score
4
Points
330
Anyone know where I can find the format for the nine liner? I have DIN access if need be.
 
Try the CIED site on the DIN.

I did manage to find it using the DND Search, after much frustration.

I also found it on the Internet by using Google.
 
George Wallace said:
I suppose the next question you are going to ask will be for a MIST Report:

MIST Report

Used when handing a casualty over to a medical team


M - mechanism of injury (mine, GSW, RPG, RTA etc)

I - type of Injury (found and or suspected)

S - signs (pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate)

T - treatment given (morphine, tourniquet etc)

A/C – adult/child (include age if known)

Don't take this for gospel!
 
Perfect! Thanks gang. I tried a Google search but for some reason couldn't find it.  :salute:

And thanks for the MIST Report. That too is going into my Aide de Memoir.
 
A modified NATO 9 liner format was adopted for use in the Spring of this year. Significant changes to categorization (vice priority) pick up / delivery time lines, and minor changes to para 8 , the nationality of the casualties.  Even the has US military signed off on the mod!
Unfortunately, I don't the format readily available to post. as I'm several hours from my office.
Additionally, there is a NATO doc detailing changes in what was once known as the "golden hour", it should be read in conjunction with the new 9 liner...
 
Good to know. Would you be able to post it at some point in the future?
 
So... anything? :D Waiting on this one as well :D
 
If you haven't received anything by tomorrow morning, drop me a PM here with your email and I'll email you the most recent 9 Liner/MIST in use. I've digital copies of almost all reports/returns. I'm in Gagetown, so take any time difference into consideration.
 
mikeninercharlie said:
Can you wait a couple of hours, some of us are on exercise on the 2010 host city...

Sure you're in the same city as I am and on Pandemonium, I understand :D
 
Awesome, thanks for the new format. I'd heard there had been some changes.
 
Does anyone know if any subsequent changes were made to this important document?
 
You can also download the JFIRE online.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/doctrine/dod/t0302060.pdf

Edit: Wrong link
 
Simian Turner said:
Does anyone know if any subsequent changes were made to this important document?

Was just down in Fort Pickett VA, and no changes have been made to date that I could see. The US Marines we were working with, plus our own guys, provided refresher training, and it looks G2G.

Man, to have the resources the US has. Granted, it was a training scenario, but when you have to do a cas evac, and as soon as you have the first five lines out over the means, and you know the blades are turning on the chopper, it's pretty cool. Finish it, plus the MIST, and the medevac team is already in the air. Most realistic trg I've been on yet.

And the US pilots will land anywhere. On one IED strike scenario, where we had three cas, they landed those Blackhawks on a postage stamp.  :salute:
 
What kind of escort helos were they using for the Blackhawks - other Blackhawks or Apaches?  Were the escort helos already on station or did they launch with casevac?

Not sure that it is realistic to have rotors turning after 5 lines - they still need a mission brief and need to know what equipment to have on board.

They do have lots of great kit but the mission risk level determines the approvals required for launch this results from assessment of ground activity, security level at HLS , do other ops with higher priority for casevac, patient census level and Operating Room status at  closest treatment facility.

Realistic scenarios would allow some prep work before launching high priority assets.

 
Back
Top