- Reaction score
- 2,592
- Points
- 1,260
Shared in accordance with the "fair dealing" provisions, Section 29, of the Copyright Act - http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/info/act-e.html#rid-33409
Risk to troops in Afghanistan exposed
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19125683.100&print=true
New Scientist, 9 Sept 06
The ferocity of the Taliban's assault on coalition forces in Afghanistan has been highlighted by a penetrating statistical analysis of fatality rates among coalition troops. Since May, an average of five coalition soldiers have been killed every week by the Taliban - twice the death rate suffered by coalition forces during the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
The analysis shows that troops are fighting one of the fiercest campaigns since the Bush administration's "war on terror" began in 2001.
Sheila Bird, vice-president of the UK's Royal Statistical Society, suspected that the casualty figures issued by the US, UK and Canadian governments do not give a true picture of the risks coalition forces face, because they do not reveal fatalities as a proportion of the forces deployed.
Bird found that from 1 May to 12 August, 73 of the 18,500 members of NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan were killed, a rate of nearly 14 deaths per 1000 person years. This compares to the 43-day battle for control of Iraq in 2003, in which the UK lost 33 personnel from 46,000 deployed - a rate of 6 deaths per 1000 person years. The ISAF fatality rate of almost five deaths per week shows no sign of falling: in the three weeks since 12 August, 13 more coalition troops have died, and the crash of a British Nimrod aircraft on 2 September added 14 more deaths.
"The commentary we are getting from politicians about this conflict does not do justice to the threat our forces now face in Afghanistan," Bird says.
How the MSM is covering this so far:
NATO soldiers fighting in Afghanistan face a higher risk of being killed than the U.S.-led international forces that invaded Iraq in 2003, a British statistician says. Sheila Bird, the vice-president of Britain's Royal Statistical Society, said in the Sept. 9 issue of New Scientist magazine that she made the conclusion after analyzing casualty rates and the number of soldiers deployed on each mission . . . .
(CBC Online, http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2006/09/07/soldiers-statistics.html )
International forces in Afghanistan are embroiled in the deadliest military campaign since the Bush administration launched its "war on terror" in 2001, an analysis of casualties revealed today. Attacks by Taliban insurgents have raised the fatality rate among Nato's 18,500-strong International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) to an average of five a week - more than twice the death rate coalition forces sustained during the battle for control of Iraq in 2003, the study found . . . .
(Guardian (UK), http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/story/0,,1866823,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1 )
Three more British soldiers died yesterday in Afghanistan as a study revealed that attacks by the resurgent Taliban have raised the death rate of coalition troops to double that during the invasion of Iraq. One soldier was killed after a patrol unwittingly strayed on to an unmarked minefield during an operation in the volatile Helmand province . . . .
(The Herald (UK), http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/69613.html )
http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/story/0,,1866823,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1
Risk to troops in Afghanistan exposed
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19125683.100&print=true
New Scientist, 9 Sept 06
The ferocity of the Taliban's assault on coalition forces in Afghanistan has been highlighted by a penetrating statistical analysis of fatality rates among coalition troops. Since May, an average of five coalition soldiers have been killed every week by the Taliban - twice the death rate suffered by coalition forces during the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
The analysis shows that troops are fighting one of the fiercest campaigns since the Bush administration's "war on terror" began in 2001.
Sheila Bird, vice-president of the UK's Royal Statistical Society, suspected that the casualty figures issued by the US, UK and Canadian governments do not give a true picture of the risks coalition forces face, because they do not reveal fatalities as a proportion of the forces deployed.
Bird found that from 1 May to 12 August, 73 of the 18,500 members of NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan were killed, a rate of nearly 14 deaths per 1000 person years. This compares to the 43-day battle for control of Iraq in 2003, in which the UK lost 33 personnel from 46,000 deployed - a rate of 6 deaths per 1000 person years. The ISAF fatality rate of almost five deaths per week shows no sign of falling: in the three weeks since 12 August, 13 more coalition troops have died, and the crash of a British Nimrod aircraft on 2 September added 14 more deaths.
"The commentary we are getting from politicians about this conflict does not do justice to the threat our forces now face in Afghanistan," Bird says.
How the MSM is covering this so far:
NATO soldiers fighting in Afghanistan face a higher risk of being killed than the U.S.-led international forces that invaded Iraq in 2003, a British statistician says. Sheila Bird, the vice-president of Britain's Royal Statistical Society, said in the Sept. 9 issue of New Scientist magazine that she made the conclusion after analyzing casualty rates and the number of soldiers deployed on each mission . . . .
(CBC Online, http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2006/09/07/soldiers-statistics.html )
International forces in Afghanistan are embroiled in the deadliest military campaign since the Bush administration launched its "war on terror" in 2001, an analysis of casualties revealed today. Attacks by Taliban insurgents have raised the fatality rate among Nato's 18,500-strong International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) to an average of five a week - more than twice the death rate coalition forces sustained during the battle for control of Iraq in 2003, the study found . . . .
(Guardian (UK), http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/story/0,,1866823,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1 )
Three more British soldiers died yesterday in Afghanistan as a study revealed that attacks by the resurgent Taliban have raised the death rate of coalition troops to double that during the invasion of Iraq. One soldier was killed after a patrol unwittingly strayed on to an unmarked minefield during an operation in the volatile Helmand province . . . .
(The Herald (UK), http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/69613.html )
http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/story/0,,1866823,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1