I wasn't sure whether to post this in Current News or Canadian Military but decided to put it under Canadian Politics because it dealt with the OAG. Please feel free to move it if you feel it's in the wrong section.
This report details the Canadian Forces status regarding recruitment, retention, attrition, shortages in the Regular Force and many other challenges. I had some free time at work and decided to read through it, while I often find government reports to be extremely boring, this was quite interesting(probably because I find the Canadian Forces interesting).
While the Canadian Forces is an admirable and great organization, we should pay more attention to it so we can help it grow and serve our country best. I hope my post doesn't come off disrespectful to any members, serving or retired, because that is not my intention. As a civilian I merely found this report a worthwhile read. I doubt you all have to time or patience to read through it but I'll post the Conclusion which summarizes much of the report.
This report details the Canadian Forces status regarding recruitment, retention, attrition, shortages in the Regular Force and many other challenges. I had some free time at work and decided to read through it, while I often find government reports to be extremely boring, this was quite interesting(probably because I find the Canadian Forces interesting).
While the Canadian Forces is an admirable and great organization, we should pay more attention to it so we can help it grow and serve our country best. I hope my post doesn't come off disrespectful to any members, serving or retired, because that is not my intention. As a civilian I merely found this report a worthwhile read. I doubt you all have to time or patience to read through it but I'll post the Conclusion which summarizes much of the report.
Conclusion
2.73 Overall, National Defence has made satisfactory progress in responding to our 2002 recommendations. It has shown some improvement in recruiting the military personnel it needs to meet its operational requirements. But, since 2002, the trained effective strength of the Regular Force has grown by only about 700 members, and there is a shortage of about 2,400 qualified people to meet the needs of the Canadian Forces to accomplish their military tasks.
2.74 The Department has not been able to improve its recruiting of Aboriginal people, visible minorities, or women since our 2002 audit. Despite an increase in the youth population of these groups, the number of these recruits joining the Regular Force is declining. Even though the Department has carried out studies on the demographics of the Canadian labour force, is promoting diversity, and is spending $1.5 million on diversity recruiting, these efforts are not achieving results.
2.75 We also found that military occupations that were below their required staffing levels in 2002 are still experiencing problems today. The Navy, Army, and Air Force have improved the staffing levels of some critical occupations, but there are still persistent shortages in both the support and specific occupations.
2.76 Even though the Department has taken action to address personnel shortages, we found that intake is barely replacing the number of members who are leaving. The recruiting and selection process is not meeting the needs of the Canadian Forces, and the Department needs to address problems that prevent it from getting the right number of suitable candidates from which to select recruits.
2.77 In 2002, we found that the Department needed to gather better information on attrition and to develop more effective retention initiatives. Since then, National Defence has been analyzing reasons for attrition and ways to address why members leave. Although some steps have been taken to address concerns, attrition in early and later years is still expected to increase, and the Department needs to continue its work to better identify what actions it should take to ensure that attrition does not become problematic.
2.78 Although National Defence has taken steps toward integrating concerns about the management of the military human resources in the decision-making process, it needs to continue to assess the impacts that the Canadian Forces' goals for transformation will have on the military human resources system. Under the new terms of reference for the position of the Assistant Deputy Minister-Military Human Resources, the Department has increased its ability to effectively manage an integrated human resources management system for all the Canadian Forces in line with the new vision of the 2005 Defence policy statement.
