- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 50
Posted by "Gow" <[email protected]> on Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:10:29 -0400
What would happen, say, if we looked at a specific problem, and saw that
the CF was not a popular career choice, or the PRes was not popular,
just in terms or renumeration?
If that would be accurate, could we say that the effect of the income
tax the members paid was infitesmal in the greater picture of things as
a country?
So what would be the difference if CF pay and ONLY for members, not
civvy staff was non-taxable?
Pay rates could be effectively reduced, costs might go down, attraction
would go up. Certainly.
What else?
Lets discuss this.
What would happen, say, if we looked at a specific
problem,
and saw that the CF was not a popular career choice, or the PRes was not
popular, just in terms or renumeration?
If that would be accurate, could we say that the
effect of the
income tax the members paid was infitesmal in the greater picture of
things as a
country?
So what would be the difference if CF pay and ONLY
for
members, not civvy staff was non-taxable?
Pay rates could be effectively reduced, costs might
go down,
attraction would go up. Certainly.
What else?
Lets discuss this.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish
to remove, with the line "unsubscribe army" in the
message body.
What would happen, say, if we looked at a specific problem, and saw that
the CF was not a popular career choice, or the PRes was not popular,
just in terms or renumeration?
If that would be accurate, could we say that the effect of the income
tax the members paid was infitesmal in the greater picture of things as
a country?
So what would be the difference if CF pay and ONLY for members, not
civvy staff was non-taxable?
Pay rates could be effectively reduced, costs might go down, attraction
would go up. Certainly.
What else?
Lets discuss this.
What would happen, say, if we looked at a specific
problem,
and saw that the CF was not a popular career choice, or the PRes was not
popular, just in terms or renumeration?
If that would be accurate, could we say that the
effect of the
income tax the members paid was infitesmal in the greater picture of
things as a
country?
So what would be the difference if CF pay and ONLY
for
members, not civvy staff was non-taxable?
Pay rates could be effectively reduced, costs might
go down,
attraction would go up. Certainly.
What else?
Lets discuss this.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish
to remove, with the line "unsubscribe army" in the
message body.

