• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Petraeus to CIA

Edward Campbell

Army.ca Myth
Subscriber
Donor
Mentor
Reaction score
6,316
Points
1,260
This, reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail is still rumour unofficial:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/americas/petraeus-to-take-over-cia-panetta-to-pentagon-reports/article2000326/
Petraeus to take over CIA, Panetta to Pentagon: reports

ANNE GEARAN, KIMBERLY DOZIER
Washington— The Associated Press

Published Wednesday, Apr. 27, 2011

Administration sources say President Barack Obama plans this week to name CIA Director Leon Panetta to replace Defence Secretary Robert Gates, and Gen. David Petraeus, now running the war in Afghanistan, would take the CIA chief's job.

The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity because the changes are not final.

The changes would probably take effect this summer. Mr. Gates has already said he will leave this year.

The officials say Obama is expected to also announce that Lt. Gen. John Allen would replace Petraeus as Afghanistan commander, and that diplomat Ryan Crocker will be the next U.S. ambassador in Afghanistan.

The changes are expected to be announced Thursday at the White House.

In the coming months, President Barack Obama, who is preparing to begin bringing U.S. forces home from Afghanistan this summer, will have to name replacements for Mr. Gates, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen, other senior military leaders and probably Gen. Petraeus himself.

Gen. Petraeus, who took over as Afghanistan war commander in June, is expected to leave that post before the end of this year. Adm. Mullen, the nation's top military officer, will leave his post in the fall.

U.S. military and civilian defense leaders call 2011 the make-or-break year for turning around the war in Afghanistan and laying the path for a gradual U.S. exit by 2015. The main obstacles are the uncertain leadership and weak government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, the open question of whether the Taliban can be integrated into Afghan political life and the continued safe harbor Pakistan provides for militants attacking U.S. and NATO forces over the border in Afghanistan.

Gen. Petraeus claims that military advances, especially in the traditional Taliban stronghold areas of southern Afghanistan, have blunted the Taliban-led insurgency and given the edge to the U.S. and its NATO partners. A planned transition to Afghan security control begins this year, and the U.S. wants to start withdrawing some of its approximately 100,000 forces in July.

The nearly wholesale changes at the top of Mr. Obama's Afghanistan military and diplomatic lineup will leave fewer military and civilian leaders who have Mr. Obama's ear and who also have Afghanistan experience.

The top candidate to replace Adm. Mullen, a Navy admiral, as Joint Chiefs chairman is Marine Gen. James Cartwright, who has never has served there. The same is true for the leading candidate to replace Gen. Petraeus whenever he goes, Marine Lt. Gen. John Allen. Gen. Petraeus' top deputy, Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez, who also is leaving, has one of the longest Afghanistan resumes in the U.S. military.


This is a bigger story than just Petraeus, as the last two paragraphs make clear.
 
E.R. Campbell said:
This, reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail is still rumour unofficial:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/americas/petraeus-to-take-over-cia-panetta-to-pentagon-reports/article2000326/

This is a bigger story than just Petraeus, as the last two paragraphs make clear.
That is interesting, not only do two key jobs - including the top one  - go to Marines, but what is probably more telling, neither had served in Afghanistan. I am not sure what to make of it, but I will fall back on the basic tenet to never assume that an action was taken for devious or conspiratorial reasons, when simple stupidity or incompetence was probably the reason. Seriously, it may be a case of wanting a fresh approach from minds untarnished by knowledge and experience.

 
Old Sweat said:
Seriously, it may be a case of wanting a fresh approach from minds untarnished by knowledge and experience.
Best line of the week  ;D
 
If Obama thinks Petraeus may be a political candidate,then making him CIA director is a way to possibly neutralize him.As a bonus the republicans in the Senate will get behind his appointment.
 
Or maybe, just maybe, Obama thinks he's the best man for the job?
 
Always the chance that Obama believes that,but I dont think Petreaus is best suited for taking on a well entrenched bureaucracy.CIA needs a no nonsense guy who isnt afraid to tear the walls down and start over.While that may be extreme,if it were me I would ferret out the leakers at the sametime that I forced alot of people into early retirement.The place has more than its share of socialists who dont have the best interest of the US at heart.Can anyone think of an effective CIA director ? The one that comes to mind is William Casey.One of the worst was Admiral Turner.
 
Back
Top